Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-18T20:00:11.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Canadian Cases in Public International Law in 2004–5 /Jurisprudence canadienne en matière de droit international public en 2004–5

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

Gibran van Ert
Gibran van Ert*
Affiliation:
Hunter Litigation Chambers , Vancouver
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Cases / Jurisprudence
Information
Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international , Volume 43 , 2006 , pp. 611 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Council on International Law / Conseil Canadien de Droit International, representing the Board of Editors, Canadian Yearbook of International Law / Comité de Rédaction, Annuaire Canadien de Droit International 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Extradition Act, S.C. 1999, c. 18, as amended.

2 Treaty between the Czechoslovak Republic and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for the Extradition of Criminals, [1928] Can. T.S. no. 8.

3 Czech Republic v. Moravek at para. 15.

4 Ibid. at paras. 23–6; Czech Republic v. Gams, 2004 BCSC 688.

5 Czech Republic v. Moravek at paras. 27–29; United States of America v. Lépine, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 286.

6 Czech Republic v. Moravek at paras. 30–32.

7 See [2004] Can. Y.B. Int’l L. 593.

8 North American Free Trade Agreement, [1994] Can. T.S. no 2.

9 International Commercial Arbitration Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. 1–9.

10 United Mexican States v. Karpa at para. 28.

11 See para. 187 of the tribunal’s award, quoted in United Mexican States v. Karpa at para. 21.

12 United Mexican States v. Karpa at para. 34; see also paras. 35–36.

13 Ibid. at paras. 37–38.

14 In this Armstrong J.A. was mistaken. While NAFTA Article 1124(4) does provide for such a roster, it has never been populated.

15 United Mexican States v. Karpa at paras. 39–43.

16 Model Law article 34 (1): “(1) Recourse to a court against an arbitral award may be made only by an application for setting aside in accordance with paragraphs (2) and (3) of this article.” This article is implemented in Ontario by the schedule to the International Commercial Arbitration Act R.S.O. 1990 c. I-9.

17 (1992) 7 O.R. (3d) 608 at 623, quoted in United Mexican States v. Karpa at para. 66 (original emphasis).

18 United Mexican States v. Karpa at paras. 67–68.

19 Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985 c. C-46, as amended.

20 National Defence Act, R.S.C. 1985 c. N-4, as amended.

21 NATO Status of Forces Agreement, [1953] Can. T.S. no. 13.

22 R. v. Cook, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 597.

23 Saunders at paras. 40–41.

24 Ibid. at paras. 48–54.

25 Ibid. at paras. 55–58.

26 Solomonv. Commissioners of Customs and Excise, [1967] 2 Q.B. 116 at 143–4; quoted in Saunders at para. 31.

27 Commercial Arbitration Act, R.S.C. 1985 c. 17 (2ndSupp.).

28 Prince George (City) v. McElhanney Engineering Serivc.es Ltd. (1995), 9 B.C.L.R. (3d) 368(C.A.).

29 Boari Sweden AB v. NYA Stromnes AB (1988), 41 B.L.R. 295 (Ont. H.C.).

30 Norsk Hydro ASA v. State Property Fund of Ukraine, [2002] E.W.H.C. 2120 (Comm.) at para. 17.

31 Immigration Act, R.S.C. 1985 c. I-12, as amended.

32 Mugesera at para. 36.

33 Ibid. at para. 82.

34 Prosecutor v. Akayesu (1998), 9 I.H.R.R. 608 (I.C.T.R.).

35 Mugesera at paras. 84–85.

36 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, [ 1949] Can.T.S. no. 27.

37 Mugesera at paras. 86–87.

38 Prosecutor v. Nahimana, Barayagwiza and Ngeze, Case no. ICTR-99-52-T-I, 3 December 2003.

39 Mugesera at paras. 88–89.

40 Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes Act, S.C. 2000 c. 24 as amended.

41 Mugesera at para. 118.

42 Ibid. at para. 119.

43 Ibid. at para. 125.

44 R. v. Finta, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 701.

45 Mugesera at para. 134.

46 Ibid. at para. 135.

47 Ibid. at para. 143.

48 Ibid. at para. 150.

49 Ibid. at para. 151.

50 Ibid. at para. 152.

51 Ibid. at paras. 153–70.

52 Ibid. at para. 173.

53 Ibid. at para. 178.

54 See, for example, the question of refoulement to torture in Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3 [Suresh] or McLachlin, J.’s dissent in R. v. Keegstra, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697.Google Scholar

55 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, [2002] Can. T.S. no. 13.

56 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, [1976] Can. T.S. no. 47.

57 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, [1976] Can. T.S. no. 46.

58 Convention on the Rights of the Child, [1992] Can. T.S. no. 3.

59 Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001 c. 27, as amended.

60 De Guzman at para. 53.

61 Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigation), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817.

62 2005 F.C.A. 436.

63 Loi sur l’immigration et la protection des réfugiés, L.C. 2001 ch. 27 tel que modifié.

64 Ahani c. Canada, communication n 1051/2002.

65 Charkaoui au para. 142.

66 A(FC) and Others (FC) v. Secretary of State for the. Home Department, 2004 U.K.H.L. 56.

67 Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001 c. 27, as amended.

68 Almrei at para. 123.

69 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, [1969] Can. T.S. no. 6.

70 Suresh, supra note 54.

71 Almrei at para. 126.

72 Extradition Act, supra note 1.

73 Ortega at paras. 74–75.

74 Ibid. at paras. 76–81.

75 Ibid. at paras. 82–84.