No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Canadian Practice in International Law during 1965 and 1966 as Reflected in Public Statements
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 March 2016
Abstract
- Type
- Other
- Information
- Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international , Volume 6 , 1968 , pp. 279 - 329
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Canadian Council on International Law / Conseil Canadien de Droit International, representing the Board of Editors, Canadian Yearbook of International Law / Comité de Rédaction, Annuaire Canadien de Droit International 1968
References
160 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. III, at 3070 (June 30, 1965); H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. V, at 4563 (May 2, 1966), and ibid., Vol. VIII, at 8333 (Oct. 5, 1966).
16l H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XII, at 13081-82. For an earlier statement by the Prime Minister, see ibid., 12400 (March 16, 1965).
162 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. II, at 1335-66.
163 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XII, at 13033-44.
164 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. IV, at 4227 (April 25, 1966).
165 Ibid., Vol. V, at 5355, 5356 (May 19, 1966).
166 Ibid., Vol. I, at 577. See also H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. I, at 403 (April 26, 1965). A firm statement against water exports was given by the Minister of Northern Affairs and National Resources in a speech on April 12, 1965 to the Pacific Northwest Trade Association Conference at Portland, Oregon. See also the statement by the Minister of Mines and Technical Surveys in H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. VII, at 6997 (June 28, 1966).
167 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. VIII, at 8056, 8057.
168 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966-67, Vol. XI, at 11458 (Dec. 21, 1966).
169 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 637.
170 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. III, at 2321 (June 14, 1965). Mr. Thomas Kierans, the originator of the Grand Canal Proposal, had described his proposal at hearings before the Standing Committee on Mines, Forests and Waters: ibid., Vol. II, at 1300 (May 14, 1965). See also H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 571 (Feb. 2, 1966).
171 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. III, at 2757, 2758.
172 Ibid., Vol. I, at 491.
173 See, for example, ibid., 637 (Feb. 3, 1966), 933-36 (Feb. 8, 1966), 132435 (Feb. 16, 1966); ibid., Vol. II, at 1358 (Feb. 17, 1966), 1443 (Feb. 18, 1966), 1703 (Feb. 24, 1966); ibid., Vol. VII, at 6790 (June 23, 1966).
174 Ibid., Vol. III, at 2757 (March 16, 1966) and Vol. VIII, at 7865 (August 31, 1966).
175 Ibid., Vol. VI, at 5991 (June 6, 1966) and Vol. IX, at 9598 (Nov. 7, 1966). See also, Lawford, , “Canadian Practice in International Law during 1964 as Reflected in Public Statements,” 4 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 220, 238-39 (1966).Google Scholar
176 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. VIII, at 7872.
177 Ibid., Vol. II, at 1313 (Feb. 16, 1966). See also ibid., Vol. III, at 2358 (March 8, 1966).
178 Ibid., Vol. I, at 936. 179 Ibid., Vol. II, at 1229.
180 The text of the exchange of notes is reprinted at 54 Dept. State Bull. 67-68 (1966). A background note is in 53 Dept. State Bull. 215 et seq. (1965).
181 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 933-34.
182 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. I, at 936-38 (May 4, 1965).
183 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. III, at 2651 (March 14, 1966).
184 Ibid., Vol. IV, at 3786 (April 4, 1966).
185 Ibid., Vol. V, at 4690 (May 4, 1966).
186 Ibid., Vol. VI, at 5670 (May 30, 1966).
187 Exchange of Notes relating to the agreement of 9 March, 1959 concerning the tariff of tolls on the St. Lawrence Seaway. Signed at Ottawa, 30 June, 1964. Texts: 1964 Can.T.S. No. 13; 15 U.S.T. 1390; T.I.A.S. 5608; 530 U.N.T.S. 364. Tabled Feb. 24, 1965 as Ses. P. 29U: see m Can. C. J. 1077.
188 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. II, at 1665 (Feb. 23, 1966). See also ibid., Vol. III, at 3085, 3086 (March 24, 1966).
189 Ibid., Vol. V, at 4419 (April 28, 1966), 4865-66 (May 9, 1966), 5361 (May 20, 1966).
190 Perhaps startled by their success in obtaining the debate, opposition members delivered relatively disorganized speeches, and the government, caught by surprise, delivered speeches which were no better. For a good statement of the government’s case, see the speech of the Acting Minister of Transport at ibid., Vol. VI, at 5557.
191 Ibid., 5600 (May 27, 1966), 5683 (May 30, 1966), 5919 (June 3, 1966).
192 Ibid., Vol. VII, at 7126 (July 4, 1966), 7458-59 (July 11, 1966). See also ibid., 7659 (July 14, 1966).
193 Ibid., Vol. IV, at 3941.
194 Ibid., Vol. V, at 5170.
195 Ibid., Vol. VIII, at 8588 (Oct. 12, 1966). The correspondence was tabled on October 27, 1966: ibid., Vol. IX, at 9159. For other matters respecting implementation of the Columbia River agreements, see ibid., Vol. III, at 2751 et seq. (March 15, 1966), Vol. VIII, at 7937 (Sept. 1, 1966), and 8061 (Sept. 6, 1966).
196 Signed at Geneva, March 6, 1948. Text: 289 U.N.T.S. 3.
197 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. III, at 3205 et seq. (March 25, 1966).
198 See Lawford, op. cit. supra note 175, at 240.
199 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XI, at 11517 (Feb. 19, 1965).
200 Ibid., Vol. XII, at 12940.
201 See, for example, H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. I, at 724-25 (April 29, 1965) ) 978-79 (May 6, 1965); Vol. III, at 2259 (June 11, 1965) ; H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 20 (January 19, 1966), 731 et seq. (Feb. 4, 1966) , 967 (Feb. 9, 1966), 999 (Feb. 10, 1966); ibid., Vol. II, at 1517 (Feb. 21, 1966), 1783 (Feb. 25, 1966); ibid., Vol. III, at 2292 (March 7, 1966); ibid., Vol. VII, at 6971 (June 23, 1966), 7467 (June 11, 1966); ibid., Vol. VIII, at 8061 (Sept. 6, 1966), 8258 (Sept. 9, 1966), 8215 (Oct. ir, 1966), 8724 (Oct. 17, 1966); ibid., Vol. IX, at 8899-8900 (Oct. 20, 1966), 8960 (Oct. 21, 1966), 8987 (Oct. 21, 1966); ibid., Vol. X, at 10706 (Dec. 5, 1966); H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966-67, Vol. XI, at 11154 (Dec. 15, 1966), 11305 (Dec. 19, 1966).
202 See, esp. per Mr. Martin, H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. III, at 2292 (March 7, 1966).
203 Ibid., 2923.
204 Ibid., Vol. V, at 5259.
205 Ibid., Vol. I, at 731 et seq., esp. at 733.
206 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. II, at 2036-37.
207 Ibid., 1461.
208 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. II, at 1319.
209 Ibid., 1853. See also ibid., Vol. III, at 2773 (March 16, 1966).
210 Ibid., Vol. V, at 4790 (May 6, 1966), 4930 (May 10, 1966), 5169 (May 16, 1966), 5292 (May 19, 1966).
211 Ibid., 5257-58. See also ibid., 5366-69 (May 20, 1966).
212 Ibid., Vol. I, at 589.
213 Ibid., Vol. II, at 1542 et seq. See also H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XI, at 11571 (Feb. 22, 1965), 11759 (Feb. 26, 1965); H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. I, at 405 (April 26, 1965), 728-29 (April 29, 1965) ; ibid., Vol. III, at 2492 (June 16, 1965), 2842-44 (June 25, 1965), 2933-34 (June 28, 1965); H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. IX, at 9087 (Oct. 25, 1966).
214 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. III, at 3053 (March 23, 1966).
215 See supra, under heading “Lakes and Rivers,” a discussion of another aspect of this matter.
216 Ibid., Vol. IV, at 3367 (March 29, 1966).
217 Ibid., Vol. IX, at 8961 (Oct. 21, 1966).
218 Ibid., Vol. II, at 1784. See also H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. III, at 2941 (June 28, 1965) and H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. X, at 10230 (Nov. 22, 1966).
219 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. IX, at 8976 (Oct. 21, 1966).
220 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. II, at 1095-96. For a report of the success of the inspection procedure, see ibid., Vol. III, at 2673 (June 21, 1965).
221 Ibid., Vol. III, at 2165 (June 9, 1965).
222 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 1312-13.
223 Press Releases of May 6 and August 9, 1966.
224 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 370, 371 (January 27, 1966).
225 Ibid., Vol. III, at 2702.
226 Ibid., Vol. IV, at 4378-79.
227 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XI, at 11623 (Feb. 23, 1965).
228 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. V, at 6359-60. For earlier questions concerning Yugoslav ship jumpers, see ibid., Vol. III, at 2357 (March 8, 1966), 2451 (March 9, 1966). For detailed statistics concerning numbers of seamen deserting ships and subsequently deported, see ibid., Vol. VIII, at 7758-59 (August 29, 1966).
229 Ibid., Vol. X, at 10705. For a statement on certain cases, see ibid., 10749 (Dec. 6, 1966).
230 Ibid., Vol. III, at 2632.
231 Ibid., Vol. VII, at 7376-77.
232 Ibid., Vol. IX, at 9950-51.
233 White Paper on Immigration, October 1966. Ottawa, Queen’s Printer, 1966. For the Minister’s statement on tabling the document, see H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. VIII, at 8651-52.
234 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. I, at 170-71 (April 9, 1965); H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. IV, at 3771 (April 4, 1966); ibid., Vol. IX at 9951 (Nov. 16, 1966).
235 See, for example, H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. I, at 216 (April 12, 1965) ; H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. III at 2932 (March 21, 1966).
236 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. IV, at 4099-4100 and 4104 (April 21, 1966); ibid., Vol. IX, at 8943 (Oct. 20, 1966).
237 See, for example, ibid., Vol. III, at 2767 (March 16, 1966), and Vol. X, at 9995, 9996 (Nov. 17, 1966), 10049 (Nov. 18, 1966).
238 See, for example, ibid., Vol. II, at 1311 (Feb. 16, 1966), 2049 (March 2, 1966) ; Vol. VI, at 5596 (May 26, 1966), 5973 (June 3, 1966).
239 See, for example, ibid., Vol. VIII, at 7760 (August 29, 1966), 8060 (Sept. 6, 1966); H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966-67, Vol. XI, at 11293 (Dec. 19, 1966).
240 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XI, at 12631 (March 22, 1965); H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. VII, at 7010 (June 29, 1966).
241 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. III, at 2766 (March 16, 1966).
242 Ibid., Vol. VII, at 7611 (July 13, 1966).
243 See Lawford, op. cit. supra note 175, at 249, for the background of the case. The High Court decision is Regina v. Leach, ex. p. Bergsma, [1965] 2 O.R. 200; 50 D.L.R. (2d) 114 (Schatz, J.).
244 Regina v. Leach, ex p. Bergsma, [1966] 1 O.R. 106; 52 D.L.R. (2d) 594.
245 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. III, at 2321 et seq. (March 7, 1966); ibid., Vol. VI, at 5613 et seq. (May 27, 1966).
246 Quoted, ibid., Vol. VI, at 5613, 5615.
247 Ibid., Vol. VI, at 5971. See also ibid., Vol. VII, at 6604 re acceptance of the Order of Merit by Mackenzie King.
248 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. II, at 1085.
249 Quoted, H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. V, at 4993 (May 11, 1966).
250 (1965), 53 W.W.R. 618.
251 R.S.C. 1952, c. 322.
252 (1881), 44 & 45 Vict. c. 69.
253 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. VIII, at 8194-95 (SePt- 8, 1966).
254 For text, see 52 Dept. State Bull. 191 et seq. (1965).
255 P.C. 1965-99; SOR/65-42.
256 P.C. 1965-100; SOR/65-43.
257 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XII, at 12747 (March 24, 1965).
258 See, for example, ibid., Vol. XI, at 11466.
259 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. II, at 1125 (May 10, 1965).
260 Ibid., 1110 et seq. (May 10, 1965) and 1157 et seq. (May 11, 1965).
261 See, for example, H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. III, at 2932 (March 21, 1966), 3167 (March 25, 1966), 3250 (March 28, 1966); Vol. IV, at 3724 (April ι, 1966). The number of questions was too great to permit listing of all of them. Indeed, the Minister of Industry was later to note that a page and a half of the Hansard index was devoted to listing the references to the Agreement, and to argue that this justified the delay in bringing forward a resolution: ibid., Vol. V, at 4816 (May 6, 1966).
262 Ibid., Vol. V, at 4745 et seq.
263 Ibid., 4758, 4759-60 (May 5, 1966).
264 Ibid., 4815-16.
265 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XII, at 12836 (March 24, 1965).
266 Ibid., 12836. See also ibid., 12896 (March 26, 1966).
267 For details of the arrangement, see especially the statements by the Minister of National Revenue on October 27, 1966 (H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. IX, at 9155-56) and by the Minister of Industry on November 4, 1966 (ibid., 9558-60), and the answer on November 14, 1966 to a written question (ibid., 9838-39).
268 The advance ruling was quoted by the Leader of the Opposition on October 27, 1966: ibid., 9156. For other opposition attacks and government replies, see ibid., 9029-30, 9076-86, 9123-24, 9’55-59, 9474, 9558-60, 9671, 9731, 9831, 9838-39, 9901, and Vol. X, at 10970-71.
269 [1966] S.G.R. 267; 55 D.L.R. (2d) 386; [1966] 3 C.C.C. 137; 47 CR. 382.
270 Stat. Can. 1917, c. 18; R.S.C. 1952, c. 179.
271 R.S.C. 1952, c. 149.
272 (1965), 50 D.L.R. (2d) 613. Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was granted April 5, 1965. A list of B.C. Indian treaties was tabled March 30, 1966: H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. IV, at 3611.
273 The majority decision in the George case relies upon the earlier Supreme Court of Canada decision in Sikyea v. The Queen, [1964] S.C.R. 642; 50 D.L.R. (2d) 80; 49 W.W.R. 306; [1965] 2 C.C.C. 129. See also Lawford, op. cit. supra note 175 at 250-52.
274 (1966), 57 D.L.R. (2d) 365; 56 W.W.R. 234.
275 Stat. Can. 1930, c. 29.
276 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 280-81 (Jan. 26, 1966).
277 Ibid., 313 (Jan. 27, 1966), 639-40 (Feb. 3, 1966), and Vol. IX, at 8900 (Oct. 20, 1966).
278 Ibid., Vol. VII, at 7003-04 (June 29, 1966) —assistance would be provided to appeal the Daniels case to the Supreme Court of Canada and other cases listed where assistance previously provided; Vol. IX, at 8862 — assistance would be provided to defend Indians charged with IIIegal fishing at Richibucto, N.B.
279 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. III, at 2841. See also H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. VIII, at 8382 (Oct. 6, 1966) ; Vol. IX, at 8891 (Oct. 20, 1966). =80 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 563.
281 Ibid., 314. See also a reference to a treaty between Canada and South Korea concerning quotas on textiles: H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966-67, Vol. XI, at 11459.
282 See Lawford, , “Canadian Practice in International Law during 1963,” 2 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 271, 279 (1964).Google Scholar
283 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. VIII, at 8813.
284 Stat. Can. 1966-67, c. 63, s.3. No statement explaining the bIII was made by the responsible Minister either on the resolution stage or on second reading: see H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. X, at 10797 (Dec. 6, 1966) and H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966-67, Vol. XI, at 11432 (Dec. 20, 1966).
285 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966-67, Vol. XI, at 11512 (Dec. 21, 1966).
286 (1966), 61 D.L.R. (2d) 317; [1967] B.R. 315.
287 (1966) 61 D.L.R. (2d) 317, 322; [1967] B.R. 315, 319.
288 [1967] B.R. 315, 327. A translation is at 61 D.L.R. (2d) 317, 327.
289 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. II, at 1459.
290 The text of the Protocol is reprinted along with the communique and other documents issued following the conference in H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. VII, at 7528 et seq. (July 11, 1966). For earlier references to succession to the 1925 Agreement, see Lawford, op. cit. supra note 175, at 255 et seq.
291 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. II, at 1654-55.
292 92 Stat. Can. 1966-67, c. 21.
293 For a text, see British North America Act, 1949 (U.K.), c. 22, Schedule.
294 (1965),51 D.L.R. (2d) 186.
295 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 15.
296 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XI, at 11429 (Feb. 17, 1965). For other discussion of possible O.A.S. membership, see H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 644 (Feb. 3, 1966), 754-55 (Feb. 4, 1966), 927, 929 (Feb. 8, 1966); Vol. X, at 10554 (Nov. 30, 1966), 10585 (Dec. 1, 1966).
297 For statements of the Canadian position during 1964, see Lawford, op. cit. supra note 175, at 256-57.
298 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XI, at 11433. See also ibid., 11511 (Feb. 19, 1965).
299 Ibid., 11826.
300 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. III, at 2659.
301 Ibid., 2848 (June 25, 1965).
302 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. II, at 1316.
303 Ibid., 1847-48.
304 Referred to, ibid., Vol. IX, at 9235 (Oct. 28, 1966).
305 See, for example, ibid., Vol. VIII, at 8508 (Oct. 11, 1966); Vol. IX, at 8904 (Oct. 20. 1966).
306 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. I, at 948 (May 5, 1965) ; H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. VI, at 6133 (June 8, 1966). See also H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. II, at 1612-13 (May 25, 1965) and 1989-1990 (June 4, 1965) respecting the prohibition of the export of motor vehicles to South Africa.
307 The communique was tabled by the Prime Minister on June 29, 1965, at which time he made a statement on the conference: ibid., H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. III, at 2988 et seq. The communique was reprinted as an appendix to Hansard of that date: ibid., 3050 et seq.
308 The statement by the Solicitor General in tabling the communique of the meeting is in H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. V, at 4993-94 (May 11, 1966).
309 Ibid., Vol. IX, at 9022 (Oct. 24, 1966). See also ibid., Vol. VIII, at 8375 (Oct. 6, 1966).
310 Referred to, ibid., Vol. II. at 1582-84 (Feb. 22, 1966). Several comments were made on General DeGaulle’s statement by the Prime Minister. See also, ibid., 2203 (March 4, 1966), 2482 (March 10, 1966); Vol. III, at 2647 (March 14, 1966), 2705 (March 15, 1966), 2775-76 (March 16, 1966).
311 The French aide memoire was tabled on March 18: ibid., Vol. III, at 2875 and was reprinted as an appendix to that day’s Hansard: ibid., 2917 et seq.
312 Ibid., 2875.
313 Ibid., Vol. IV, at 3647. The aide memoire was tabled April 1, 1966: ibid., 3715.
314 See, for example, ibid., 3949-50 (April 6, 1966), 4151-52 (April 22, 1966), 5362-63 (May 20, 1966); Vol. VI, at 5748 (May 31, 1966), 5817 (June ι, 1966).
315 Ibid., Vol. VI, at 6235-37. The communique was reprinted as an appendix to that day’s Hansard: ibid., 6286 et seq.
316 See, for example, ibid., Vol. VII, at 7124-25 (July 4, 1966), 7260 (July 6, 1966), 7611 (July 13, 1966); Vol. VIII (Sept. 7, 1966), 8661 (Oct. 14, 1966), 8723-24 (Oct. 17, 1966); Vol. IX, at 8863 (Oct. 19, 1966), 9161 (Oct. 27, 1966); Vol. X, at 10300-01 (Nov. 24, 1966).
317 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966-67, Vol. XI, at 11150.
318 Ibid., 11281-82 (Dec. 19, 1966).
319 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XI, at 12080 (March 8, 1965).
320 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 147-48 (Jan. 24, 1966).
321 Ibid., Vol. III, at 2639 and 2641 (March 14, 1966).
322 Ibid., Vol. IV, at 4222-23 (April 25, 1966).
323 Ibid., 4371-72 (April 27, 1966) and Vol. VI, at 5982-83 (June 6, 1966).
324 Ibid., Vol. II, at 1959-60 (Feb. 23, 1966).
325 For some of the references to Canada’s position in relation to peacekeeping in Cyprus, see H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XII, at 12338 (March 15, 1965), 12475-77 (March 17, 1965), 12635-36 (March 22, 1965); H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. II, at 1285-86 (May 14, 1965), 1774 et seq. (May 28, 1965), and Vol. III, 2498 (June 16, 1965); H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 898 (Feb. 8, 1966); Vol. II, at 1847-48 and 1875 (Feb. 28, 1966), 2039 (March 2, 1966); Vol. III, at 2806 (March 17, 1966), 2861-62 (March 18, 1966); Vol. VI, at 5917-18 (June 3, 1966), 6301-02 (June 13, 1966), 6542 (June 17, 1966) ; Vol. IX, at 8952 (Oct. 21, 1966); H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966-67, Vol. XI, at 11157 (Dec. 15, 1966), 11300 (Dec. 19, 1966), 11357-58 (Dec. 20, 1966), 11459 (Dec. 21, 1966).
326 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XI, at 11468 (Feb. 18, 1965), 11566-67 (Feb. 22, 1965). A report of Feb. 27 from the Commission dealing with withdrawal of the teams was tabled on April 6, 1965: H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. I, at 11.
327 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XI, at 12065-67.
328 Referred to, ibid., 12196-97 (March 10, 1965). See also H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 232 et seq. for a statement by Mr. Martin about the minority report.
329 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. II, at 2038 (June 7, 1965). Discussions of Canada’s attitude to the Vietnamese war, of the possibility of reconvening the Geneva Conference and of related matters occupied many pages of Hansard during both 1965 and 1966. Indeed, the matter was discussed so frequently that it is impossible to list in the scope of this summary even the most significant statements of Canadian policy.
330 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 924 et seq.
331 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. II, at 1203-04. To the same effect, see Mr. Martin at ibid., 1291 (May 14, 1965).
332 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XI, at 11685.
333 Ibid., 11687.
334 The text of the communique is reprinted in H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. III, at 2398 et seq. (June 14, 1965).
335 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. II, at 1946.
336 Ibid., Vol. V, at 5424 (May 24, 1966) and Vol. VII, at 7126 (July 4, 1966).
337 Ibid., Vol. X, at 10860.
338 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XI, at 12636.
339 Ibid., 12892 (March 29, 1965).
340 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. I, at 399-400.
341 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XII, at 12938-39 (March 30, 1965).
342 Ibid., 12995 (March 31, 1965).
343 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. VII, at 7630.
344 Ibid., Vol. VIII, at 8510 (Oct. 11, 1966).
345 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966-67, Vol. XI, at 11445-46 (December ai, 1966). See also H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. VIII, at 8438-39 (Oct. 7, 1966); Vol. IX, at 9031-32 (Oct. 25, 1966), 9086 (Oct. 25, 1966), 9538 (Nov. 4, 1966), 9672 (Nov. 8, 1966).
346 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1964-65, Vol. XI, at 11680-81 (Feb. 24, 1965). See also H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. V, at 4567-68 (May 2, 1966).
347 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. I, at 950 et seq. (May 5, 1965) and Vol. II 1521 et seq. (May 20, 1965).
348 Ibid., Vol. II, at 1821-22 (June 1, 1965).
349 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 873 (Feb. 8, 1966) and 998 (Feb. 10, 1966).
350 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966-67, Vol. XI, at 11454-55 (Dec. 21, 1966). For a more normal application for production of diplomatic documents, see H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. I, at 955 (May 5, 1965), respecting documents relating to the Quebec-France Educational Agreement.
351 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. VII, at 6603-04. See also ibid., Vol. V, at 5505-06 (May 25, 1966).
352 H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1965, Vol. II, at 1048-49.
353 Ibid., Vol. III, at 2932 (June 28, 1965). For other discussion of uranium exports, see ibid., Vol. I, at 958 (May 5, 1965) ; Vol. II, at 1397-98 (May 18, 1965), 1500 (May 20, 1965), 1601-04 (May 25, 1965); H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. I, at 277-78 (Jan. 26, 1966), 714 (Feb. 4, 1966), 991-92 (Feb. 10, 1966); Vol. II, at 1238 (Feb. 15, 1966), 2004 (March 1, 1966).
354 See, for example, H.C. Deb. (Can.), 1966, Vol. II, at 1499 (Feb. 21, 1966); Vol. VI, at 5814 (June 1, 1966); Vol. VII, at 7745-46 (August 29, 1966). A return indicating the costs to Canada of licensing foreign patents was tabled April 6, 1966: ibid., Vol. IV, at 3946.
355 Ibid., Vol. VIII, at 8328-29. See also ibid., Vol. VI, at 5934 et seq. (June 3, 1966); Vol. VII, at 7537-38 (July 12, 1966), 7657-58 (July 14, 1966).
356 Ibid., Vol. III, at 3053 (March 23, 1966); Vol. V, at 5259 (May 18, 1966); Vol. VII, at 7005 (June 29, 1966); Vol. IX, at 8952 (Oct. 21, 1966).
357 Ibid., Vol. X, at 10975 (Dec. 12, 1966).
358 Ibid., Vol. VIII, at 8339.