Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:35:41.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vertically of (-1)-Lines in Scrolls Over Smooth Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Antonio Lanteri
Antonio Lanteri*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Matematica "F. Enriques"-Université Via C. Saldini 50 1-20133 Milano, Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let S be a smooth surface contained as an ample divisor in a smooth complex projective threefold X, which is a P1 -bundle, and assume that induces OP1 (1) on the fibres of X. The following fact is proven. The restriction to S of the bundle projection of X is exactly the reduction morphism of the pair provided that this one is not a conic bundle. The proof is very simple and does not involve any consideration on the nefness of the adjoint bundle Some applications of the proof are given.

Keywords

14C2014J30.ample line bundlescrollquadric bundleadjunction theory.
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , 01 June 1991 , pp. 236 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1991

References

1. Fujita, T., On polarized manifolds whose adjoint bundles are not semipositive. Adv. Studies in Pure Math. 10, 1987. Algebraic Geometry, Sendai, 1985, 167-178.Google Scholar
2. Hartshorne, R., Algebraic Geometry. Springer Verlag, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
3. Ionescu, P., Embedded projective varieties of small invariants. Algebraic Geometry, Proc. Bucharest 1982, 142-186. Lect. Notes Math. 1056. Springer Verlag, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
4. Ionescu, P., Generalized adjunction and applications. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 99 (1986), 457– 472.Google Scholar
5. Lanteri, A., Struppa, D., Projective manifolds whose topology is strongly reflected in their hyperplane sections. Geometriae Dedicata, 21 (1986) 357–374.Google Scholar
6. Sommese, A. J., On manifolds that cannot be ample divisors. Math. Ann., 221 (1976), 55–72.Google Scholar
7. Sommese, A. J., Ample divisors on threefolds. Algebraic Threefolds, Proc. Varenna 1981. Lect. Notes Math. 947, 229–240. Springer Verlag, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
8. Sommese, A. J., On the adjunction theoretic structure of projective varieties, Complex Analysis and Algebraic Geometry, Proc. Göttingen 1985. Lect. Notes Math 1194, 175-213. Springer Verlag, New York, 1986.Google Scholar