No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Some New Product Theorems in Summability
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Let A, B denote sequence-to-sequence matrix methods of summability and A · B the “dot” or iteration product defined by (A · B)x = A(Bx) for all sequences x for which this exists. Some inclusion relations are given involving the methods A, B, A · B, B · A and the method defined by the matrix product AB. We take A, B to be of certain types whose products have not been studied extensively before, e.g. H* · Ck or Ck · H* where H* is quasi-Hausdorff (and hence upper triangular) and Ck is a Cesàro matrix (which is lower triangular). The investigations show also a link between the “Product Property” A ⊂ A · B and the translativity properties of A and B.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1988
References
1.
Meyer-König, W., Untersuchungen iiber einige verwandte Limitierungsverfahren, Math. Zeit.
52 (1949), pp. 257–304.Google Scholar
2.
Meyer-König, W., Beziehungen zwischen einigen Matrizen der Limitierungstheorie, Math. Zeit.
53 (1951), pp. 450–453.Google Scholar
3.
Meyer-König, W. and Zeller, K., Kronecker-Ausdruck und Kreisverfahren der Limitierungstheorie, Math. Zeit.
114 (1970), pp. 300–302.Google Scholar
4.
Parameswaran, M. R., On the translativity of Hausdorff and some related methods of summability, J. Indian Math. Soc. (NS)
23 (1959), pp. 45–64.Google Scholar
5.
Parameswaran, M. R., Relations between certain matrix products similar to commutativity, Linear Alg. and Applns.
10 (1975), pp. 219–224.Google Scholar
6.
Zeller, K. and Beekmann, W., Théorie der Limitierungsverfahren. (Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer
1970).Google Scholar
You have
Access