Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T02:14:29.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Short Proof of the Characterization of Model Sets by Almost Automorphy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Jean-Baptiste Aujogue
Jean-Baptiste Aujogue*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile, e-mail : [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aim of this note is to provide a conceptually simple demonstration of the fact that repetitive model sets are characterized as the repetitive Meyer sets with an almost automorphic associated dynamical system.

Keywords

37B5037B05Meyer setmodel setalmost automorphy
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , 01 September 2018 , pp. 464 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2018

References

[1] Aujogue, J.-B., On embedding of repetitive Meyer multiple sets into model multiple sets. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 36(2016), no. 6, 1679–1702. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1017/etds.2O14.133Google Scholar
[2] Aujogue, J.-B., Bärge, M., Kellendonk, J., and Lenz, D.. Equicontinuous factors, proximality and Ellis semigroup for Delone sets. In: Mathematics of aperiodic order, Progr. Math., 309, Birkhäuser/Springer, Basel, 2015, pp. 137–1494.Google Scholar
[3] Auslander, J., Minimalflows and their extensions. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, 153, Notas de Matemätica, 122, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1988.Google Scholar
[4] Baake, M. and Grimm, U., Aperiodic order. Vol. 1. A mathematical invitation. Encyclopedia of Mathemtaics and its Applications, 149, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013.Google Scholar
[5] Baake, M., Hermisson, J., and Pleasants, P. A. B., The torus parametrization of quasiperiodic Ll-classes. J. Phys. A 30 (1997), 3029–3056, http://dx.doi.Org/10.1088/0305-4470/30/9/016Google Scholar
[6] Baake, M., Lenz, D., and Moody, R. V., Characterization of model sets by dynamical Systems. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 27 (2007), 341–382. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1017/S0143385706000800Google Scholar
[7] Baake, M. and Moody, R. V., Diffractive point sets with entropy. J. Physics A 31 (1998), no. 45, 9023–9039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/31/45/003Google Scholar
[8] Forrest, A., Hunton, J., and Kellendonk, J., Topological invariants for projection methodpatterns. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 159(2002), no. 758.Google Scholar
[9] Hof, A., On diffraction by aperiodk structures. Comm. Math. Phys. 169 (1995), no. 1, 25–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02101595Google Scholar
[10] Kelley, J. L., General topology. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 27, Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1975.Google Scholar
[11] Lee, J.-Y. and Moody, R. V., A characterization ofmodel multi-colour sets. Ann. Henri Poincare 7 (2006), no. 1, 125–143. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1007/s00023-005-0244-6Google Scholar
[12] Lenz, D. and Richard, C., Purepoint diffraction and cut andproject schemesfor measures: the smooth case. Math. Z. 256 (2007), no. 2, 347–378. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1007/s00209-006-0077-0Google Scholar
[13] Mackay, A. L., Crystallography and the Penrose pattern. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Colloquium on Group-Theoretical Methods in Physics (Canterbury, 1981). Phys. A 114(1982), no. 1-3, 609–613. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/0378-4371(82)90359-4Google Scholar
[14] Meyer, Y., Algebraic numbers and Harmonie analysis. North-Holland Mathematical Library, Vol. 2, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam-London; American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 1972.Google Scholar
[15] Moody, R. V., Meyer sets and their duals. In: The mathematicsl of long-range aperiodic order (Waterloo, ON, 1995), Adv. Sei. Inst. Ser. C Math. Phys. Sei., 489, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1997, pp. 403–442.Google Scholar
[16] Moody, R. V., Uniform distribution in model sets. Canad. Math. Bull. 45(2002), no. 1, 123–130. http://dx.doi.Org/10.4153/CMB-2OO2-O15-3Google Scholar
[17] Robinson, E. A. Jr., The dynamical properties of Penrose tilings. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 348(1996), no. 11, 4447–4464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-96-01640-6Google Scholar
[18] Schlottmann, M., Cut-and-project sets in locatty compact abelian groups. In: Quasicrystals and discrete geometry (Toronto, ON, 1995), Fields Inst. Monogr., 10, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998.Google Scholar
[19] Schlottmann, M., Generalized model sets and dynamical Systems. In: Directions in mathematical quasicrystals, CRM Monogr. Ser., 13, American Mathematic Society, Providence, RI, 2000.Google Scholar
[20] Strungaru, N., Almostperiodic measures and Meyer sets. arxiv:1501.00945Google Scholar
[21] Veech, W. A., Almost automorphic funetions on groups. Amer. J. Math. 87(1965), 719–751. http://dx.doi.Org/10.2307/2373071Google Scholar
[22] Veech, W. A., The equicontinuous strueture relationfor minimal Abelian transformation groups. Amer. J. Math. 90(1968), 723–732. http://dx.doi.Org/10.2307/2373480Google Scholar