Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:25:22.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Representation Theorem for Archimedean Quadratic Modules on ∗-Rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Jakob Cimprič
Jakob Cimprič*
Affiliation:
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Department of Mathematics, Jadranska 19 SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenija e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a new approach to noncommutative real algebraic geometry based on the representation theory of ${{C}^{*}}$-algebras. An important result in commutative real algebraic geometry is Jacobi's representation theorem for archimedean quadratic modules on commutative rings. We show that this theorem is a consequence of the Gelfand–Naimark representation theorem for commutative ${{C}^{*}}$-algebras. A noncommutative version of Gelfand–Naimark theory was studied by I. Fujimoto. We use his results to generalize Jacobi's theorem to associative rings with involution.

Keywords

16W8046L0546L8914P99Ordered rings with involutionC*-algebras and their representationsnoncommutative convexity theoryreal algebraic geometry
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , 01 March 2009 , pp. 39 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2009

References

[1] Sarymsakov, T. A., Ayupov, S. A., Khadzhiev, D., and Chilin, V. I., Uporyadochennye algebry. “Fan”, Tashkent, 1983.Google Scholar
[2] Berr, R. and Wörmann, T., Positive polynomials on compact sets. Manuscripta Math. 104(2001), no. 2, 135–143.Google Scholar
[3] Bichteler, K., A generalization to the non-separable case of Takesaki's duality theorem for C*-algebras. Invent. Math. 9(1969/1970), 89–98.Google Scholar
[4] Constantinescu, C., C*-algebras. Vol. 2. Banach algebras and compact operators. North-Holland Mathematical Library 59. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 2001.Google Scholar
[5] Constantinescu, C., C*-algebras. Vol. 3. General theory of C*-algebras. North-Holland Mathematical Library 60, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 2001.Google Scholar
[6] Dixmier, J., C*-algebras. North-Holland Mathematical Library 15, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam–New York–Oxford, 1977.Google Scholar
[7] Dubois, D. W., A note on David Harrison's theory of preprimes. Pacific J. Math. 21(1967), 15–19.Google Scholar
[8] Dubois, D. W., Second note on David Harrison's theory of preprimes. Pacific J.Math. 24(1968), 57–68.Google Scholar
[9] Effros, E. G. and Winkler, S., Matrix convexity: operator analogues of the bipolar and Hahn-Banach theorems. J. Funct. Anal. 144(1997), no. 1, 117–152.Google Scholar
[10] Fujimoto, I., CP-duality for C*- and W*-algebras. J. Operator Theory 30(1993), no. 2, 201–215.Google Scholar
[11] Fujimoto, I., Decomposition of completely positive maps. J. Operator Theory 32(1994), no. 2, 273–297.Google Scholar
[12] Fujimoto, I., A Gelfand-Naimark theorem for C*-algebras. Pacific J. Math. 184(1998), no. 1, 95–119.Google Scholar
[13] Jacobi, T., A representation theorem for certain partially ordered commutative rings. Math. Z. 237(2001), no. 2, 259–273.Google Scholar
[14] Jacobi, T. and Prestel, A., Distinguished representations of strictly positive polynomials. J. Reine Angew. Math. 532(2001), 223–235.Google Scholar
[15] Kadison, R. V., A representation theory for commutative topological algebra. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 1951(1951), no. 7.Google Scholar
[16] Klep, I., A Kadison-Dubois representation for associative rings. J. Pure Appl. Alg. 189(2004), no. 1–3, 211–220.Google Scholar
[17] Li, B., Real operator algebras. World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 2003.Google Scholar
[18] Li, B., Introduction to operator algebras. World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 1992.Google Scholar
[19] Marshall, M., Positive polynomials and sums of squares. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 146, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008.Google Scholar
[20] Marshall, M., ∗-orderings on a ring with involution. Comm. Algebra 28(2000), no. 3, 1157–1173.Google Scholar
[21] Marshall, M., A general representation theorem for partially ordered commutative rings. Math. Z. 242(2002), no. 2, 217–225.Google Scholar
[22] Palmer, T. W., Real C*-algebras. Pacific J. Math. 35(1970), 195–204.Google Scholar
[23] Pedersen, G. K., Analysis now. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 118, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989.Google Scholar
[24] Prestel, A., Lectures on formally real fields. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1093, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984.Google Scholar
[25] Prestel, A., Representations of real commutative rings. Expo. Math. 23(2005), no. 1, 89–98.Google Scholar
[26] Rudin, W., Functional analysis. Second edition, International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1991.Google Scholar
[27] Schmüdgen, K., Unbounded operator algebras and representation theory. Operator Theory: Advances and Applications 37, Birkhüser Verlag, Basel, 1990.Google Scholar
[28] Stone, M. H., A general theory of spectra.. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 26(1940), 280–283.Google Scholar
[29] Webster, C. and Winkler, S., The Krein-Milman theorem in operator convexity. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 351(1999), no. 1, 307–322.Google Scholar
[30] Wong, Y. C. and Ng, K. F., Partially ordered topological vector spaces. Oxford Mathematical Monographs,. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1973.Google Scholar