Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:41:29.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polynomials for Kloosterman Sums

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

S. Gurak*
Affiliation:
University of San Diego, San Diego, CA 92110, USA e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fix an integer $m>1$, and set ${{\zeta }_{m}}=\exp \left( 2\pi i/m \right)$. Let $\bar{x}$ denote the multiplicative inverse of $x$ modulo $m$. The Kloosterman sums $R\left( d \right)=\sum\limits_{x}{\zeta _{m}^{x+d\bar{x}}},1\le d\le m,\left( d,m \right)=1$, satisfy the polynomial

$${{f}_{m}}\left( x \right)=\underset{d}{\mathop{\prod }}\,\left( x-R\left( d \right) \right)={{x}^{\phi \left( m \right)}}+{{c}_{1}}{{x}^{\phi \left( m \right)-1}}+\cdot \cdot \cdot +{{c}_{\phi \left( m \right)}},$$

where the sum and product are taken over a complete system of reduced residues modulo $m$. Here we give a natural factorization of ${{f}_{m}}\left( x \right)$, namely,

$${{f}_{m}}\left( x \right)=\underset{\sigma }{\mathop{\prod }}\,f_{m}^{\left( \sigma \right)}\left( x \right),$$

where $\sigma$ runs through the square classes of the group $Z_{m}^{*}$ of reduced residues modulo $m$. Questions concerning the explicit determination of the factors $f_{m}^{\left( \sigma \right)}\left( x \right)$ (or at least their beginning coefficients), their reducibility over the rational field $\text{Q}$ and duplication among the factors are studied. The treatment is similar to what has been done for period polynomials for finite fields.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2007

References

[1] Berndt, B. C., Evans, R. J. and Williams, K. S., Gauss and Jacobi Sums. Canadian Mathematical Society Series of Monographs and Advanced Texts. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
[2] Borevich, Z. and Shafarevich, I., Number Theory. Pure and Applied Mathematics 20, Academic Press, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
[3] Gaal, L., Classical Galois Theory with Examples. Chelsea, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
[4] Gupta, S. and Zagier, D., On the coefficients of the minimal polynomial of Gaussian periods. Math. Comp. 60(1993), 385398.Google Scholar
[5] Gurak, S., Minimal polynomials for circular numbers. Pacific J. Math 112(1984), no. 2, 313331.Google Scholar
[6] Gurak, S., Factors of period polynomials for finite fields. I. In: The Rademacher Legacy toMathematics, Contemp. Math. 166, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1994), pp. 309333.Google Scholar
[7] Gurak, S., On the minimal polynomials for certain Gauss periods over finite fields. In: Finite Fields and their Applications, LondonMath. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 233, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 8596.Google Scholar
[8] Gurak, S., Minimal polynomials for Gauss periods with f = 2 . Acta Arith. 121(2006), 233257.Google Scholar
[9] Iwaniec, H., Topics in classical automorphic forms. Graduate Studies in Mathematics 17, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997.Google Scholar
[10] Lehmer, D., On the cubes of Kloosterman sums. Acta Arith. 6(1960), 1522.Google Scholar
[11] Myerson, G., Period polynomials and Gauss sums for finite fields. Acta Arith. 39(1981), no. 3, 251264.Google Scholar
[12] Salie, H., Über die Kloostermanschen Summen S(u, v; q) . Math Z. 34(1932), no. 1, 91109.Google Scholar
[13] Sarnak, P., Some applications of modular forms. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 99, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.Google Scholar