No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Let $J$ be an abelian variety and
$A$ be an abelian subvariety of
$J$ , both defined over
$Q$. Let
$x$ be an element of
${{H}^{1}}\left( Q,\,A \right)$. Then there are at least two definitions of
$x$ being visible in
$J$: one asks that the torsor corresponding to
$x$ be isomorphic over
$Q$ to a subvariety of
$J$, and the other asks that
$x$ be in the kernel of the natural map
$
{{H}^{1}}\left( Q,\,A \right)\,\to \,{{H}^{1}}\left( \text{Q},\,J \right)$. In this article, we clarify the relation between the two definitions.