Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:38:01.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Modularity of Three Calabi–Yau Threefolds With Bad Reduction at 11

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Matthias Schütt*
Affiliation:
Institut für Mathematik (C), Universität Hannover, Welfengarten 1, 30060 Hannover, Germany e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper investigates the modularity of three non-rigid Calabi–Yau threefolds with bad reduction at 11. They are constructed as fibre products of rational elliptic surfaces, involving the modular elliptic surface of level 5. Their middle $\ell$-adic cohomology groups are shown to split into two-dimensional pieces, all but one of which can be interpreted in terms of elliptic curves. The remaining pieces are associated to newforms of weight 4 and level 22 or 55, respectively. For this purpose, we develop a method by Serre to compare the corresponding two-dimensional 2-adic Galois representations with uneven trace. Eventually this method is also applied to a self fibre product of the Hesse-pencil, relating it to a newform of weight 4 and level 27.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2006

References

[B] Beauville, A., Les familles stables de courbes elliptiques sur 1 admettant quatre fibres singulières. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 294(1982), 657660.Google Scholar
[D] Deligne, P., Formes modulaires et représentations ℓ-adiques. In: Séminaire Bourbaki 1968/69, no. 355, Lect. Notes in Math. 179, Springer-Verlag, 1971, pp. 139172.Google Scholar
[DM] Dieulefait, L. and Manoharmayum, J., Modularity of rigid Calabi-Yau threefolds over . In: Calabi-Yau Varieties and Mirror Symmetry, Fields Inst. Comm. 38, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003, pp. 159166.Google Scholar
[HV] Hulek, K. and Verrill, H., On modularity of rigid and nonrigid Calabi-Yau varieties associated to the root lattice A 4. arXiv:math.AG/0304169.Google Scholar
[J] Jones, J., Tables of number fields with prescribed ramification. http://math.la.asu.edu/~jj/numberfields.Google Scholar
[L] Livné, R., Cubic exponential sums and Galois representations. In: Current Trends in Arithmetical Algebraic Geometry, Contemp. Math. 67, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1987, pp. 247261.Google Scholar
[S] Schütt, M., New examples of modular rigid Calabi-Yau threefolds. Collect. Math. 55(2004), no. 2, 219228.Google Scholar
[Sc1] Schoen, C., On the geometry of a special determinantal hypersurface associated to the Mumford-Horrocks vector bundle. J. Reine Angew.Math. 364(1986), 85111.Google Scholar
[Sc2] Schoen, C., On fiber products of rational elliptic surfaces with section. Math. Z. 197(1988), 177199.Google Scholar
[Se1] Serre, J.-P., Résumé des cours de 1984-1985, Annuaire du Collège de France 1985, 8590.Google Scholar
[Se2] Serre, J.-P., Abelian ℓ-Adic Representations and Elliptic Curves. Research Notes in Mathematics 7, A. K. Peters, Wellesley, 1998.Google Scholar
[St] Stein, W., Modular forms database., http://modular.fas.harvard.edu.Google Scholar
[SY] Saito, M.-H. and Yui, N., The modularity conjecture for rigid Calabi-Yau threefolds over . J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 41(2001), no. 2, 403419.Google Scholar
[W] Wiles, A., Modular elliptic curves and Fermat's last theorem. Ann.Math. (2) 141(1995), no. 3, 443551.Google Scholar
[Y] Yui, N., Update on the modularity of Calabi-Yau varieties. In: Calabi-Yau Varieties and Mirror Symmetry, Fields Inst. Comm. 38, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003, pp. 307362.Google Scholar