Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:14:01.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Linear Functionals and Summability Invariants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

M. S. Macphail
Affiliation:
Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
A. Wilansky
Affiliation:
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purpose of this paper is to continue the study of certain “distinguished” subsets of the convergence domain of a matrix, as developed by A. Wilansky [6] and G. Bennett [1], We also consider continuous linear functionals on the domain, and the extent to which their representation is unique; this turns out to be connected with the behaviour of the subsets.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1974

References

1. Bennett, G., Distinguished subsets and summahility invariants. Studia Math. 40 (1971), 225-234.Google Scholar
2. Chang, S.-C., Conull FK spaces belonging to the class O, Math. Z. 113 (1970), 249-254.Google Scholar
3. Sember, John J., The associative part of a convergence domain is invariant, Canad. Math. Bull. 13 (1970), 147-148.Google Scholar
4. Wilansky, A., Summability: the inset, replaceable matrices, the basis in summability space, Duke Math. J. 19 (1952), 647-660.Google Scholar
5. Wilansky, A., Convergence fields of row-finite and row-infinite reversible matrices, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1952), 389-391.Google Scholar
6. Wilansky, A., Distinguished subsets and summability invariants, J. Analyse Math. 12 (1964), 327-350.Google Scholar
7. Wilansky, A., Functional analysis, Blaisdell, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
8. Wilansky, A. and Zeller, K., Inverses of matrices and matrix-transformations, Proc Amer. Math. Soc. 6 (1955), 414-420.Google Scholar
9. Zeller, K., Allgemeine Eigenschaften von Limitierungsverfahren, Math. Z. 53 (1951), 463- 487.Google Scholar
10. Zeller, K., Faktorfolgen bei Limitierungsverfahren, Math. Z. 56 (1952), 134-151.Google Scholar