Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:03:45.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ganea and Whitehead Variants of the Lusternik–Schnirelmann Category

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Jean-Paul Doeraene  and
Mohammed El Haouari
Jean-Paul Doeraene
Affiliation:
Département de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve D’Ascq Cedex, France e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected]
Mohammed El Haouari
Affiliation:
Département de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve D’Ascq Cedex, France e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Lusternik–Schnirelmann category has been described in different ways. Two major ones, the first by Ganea, the second by Whitehead, are presented here with a number of variants. The equivalence of these variants relies on the axioms of Quillen's model category, but also sometimes on an additional axiom, the so-called “cube axiom”.

Keywords

55P30Eckmann-Hilton duality
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , 01 March 2006 , pp. 41 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2006

References

[1] Baues, H., Algebraic homotopy. Cambridge Studies in Advanced mathematics 15, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.Google Scholar
[2] Doeraene, J.-P., L.S.-category in a model category. J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 84(1993), no. 3, 215–261.Google Scholar
[3] Doeraene, J.-P., Homotopy pull backs, homotopy push outs and joins. Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. 5(1998), no. 1, 15–37.Google Scholar
[4] Ganea, T.., Lusternik-Schnirelmann category and strong category. Illinois J. Math 11(1967), 417–427.Google Scholar
[5] Hess, K. and Lemaire, J.-M., Generalizing a definition of Lusternik and Schnirelmann to model categories. J. Pure and Applied Algebra 91(1994), no. 1–3, 165–182.Google Scholar
[6] James, I. M., Reduced product spaces. Ann. of Math. 62(1955), 170–197.Google Scholar
[7] Mather, M., Pull-backs in homotopy theory. Canad. J. Math. 28(1976), no. 2, 225–263.Google Scholar
[8] Strøm, A., The homotopy category is a homotopy category. Arch. Math. 23(1972), 435–441.Google Scholar
[9] Sugawara, M., On a condition that a space is an H-space. Math. J. Okayama Univ. 6(1957), 109–129.Google Scholar
[10] Whitehead, G., The homology suspension. In: Colloque de topologie algébrique de Louvain, 1956, Georges Thone, Lige, 1957, pp. 89–95.Google Scholar