Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:45:07.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characteristic p Galois Representations That Arise from Drinfeld Modules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Nigel Boston
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA, email: [email protected]
David T. Ose
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania 17837, USA, email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We examine which representations of the absolute Galois group of a field of finite characteristic with image over a finite field of the same characteristic may be constructed by the Galois group’s action on the division points of an appropriate Drinfeld module.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2000

References

[FM] Fontaine, J.-M. and Mazur, B., Geometric Galois Representations. In: Elliptic curves and modular forms (eds. J. H. Coates and S. T. Yau), Proceedings of a conference held in Hong Kong, December 18–21, 1993. International Press, Cambridge, MA, and Hong Kong.Google Scholar
[D] Drinfeld, V. G., Elliptic Modules. Math. USSR Sbornik 23 (1974), 561592.Google Scholar
[G] Goss, D., Basic structures of function field arithmetic. Ergeb.Math. Grenzgeb. 35, Springer, 1996.Google Scholar
[H] Hayes, D., Explicit class field theory for rational function fields. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 189 (1974), 7791.Google Scholar
[O] Ose, D., Toward a deformation theory for Galois representations of function fields. J. Number Theory 70 (1998), 3761.Google Scholar
[S] Serre, J.-P., Sur les représentations modulaires de degré 2 de Gal(/Q). Duke Math. J. 54 (1987), 179–230.Google Scholar
[S2] Serre, J.-P., Topics in Galois theory. Bartlett and Jones, 1992.Google Scholar