Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:12:17.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Amitsur Cohomology in Additive Functors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

David E. Dobbs
David E. Dobbs*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let L/k be a Galois extension of fields with group G and let A be the category of k-algebras isomorphic to finite products of finite field subextensions of L/k. It is known that, with appropriately defined covers, A is dual to the underlying category of a Grothendieck topology T [5, Ch. I, Theorem 4.2] and that (strict) cohomological dimension of G may be characterized via TCech cohomology with coefficients in either additive (product-preserving) functors or sheaves [5, Ch. I, Theorems 4.3 and 5.9].

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 1973 , pp. 417 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1973

References

1. Artin, M., Grothendieck topologies, (mimeographed notes), Harvard Univ., Cambridge, Mass., 1962.Google Scholar
2. Bucur, I. and Deleanu, A., Introduction to the theory of categories and functors, Wiley, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
3. Chase, S. U., Harrison, D. K. and Rosenberg, A., Galois theory and Galois cohomology of commutative rings, Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. 52, 1965.Google Scholar
4. Chase, S. U. and Rosenberg, A., Amitsur cohomology and the Brauer group, Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. 52, 1965.Google Scholar
5. Dobbs, D., Cech cohomological dimensions for commutative rings. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970.Google Scholar
6. Freyd, P., Abelian categories, Harper and Row, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
7. Grothendieck, A., Surquelques points d’algèbre homologique, Tôhoku Math. J. 9 (1957), 119?221.Google Scholar
8. Lang, S., Rapport sur la cohomologie des groupes, Benjamin, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
9. Morris, R., The reciprocity isomorphisms of class field theory for separable field extensions, thesis, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y., 1970.Google Scholar
10. Morris, R., The inflation-restriction theorem for Amitsur cohomology, Pacific J. Math. 41 (1972), 791–797.Google Scholar
11. Serre, J.-P., Cohomologie Galoisienne, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1965.Google Scholar