Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:18:59.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structure factorielle d’une version française du Nursing Home Behavior Problem Scale*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2014

July Fraser
Affiliation:
École de psychologie, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
Philippe Landreville*
Affiliation:
École de psychologie, Université Laval, Québec, Canada Axe Vieillissement, Centre de recherche FRSQ du Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire de Québec, Canada
Philippe Voyer
Affiliation:
Faculté des sciences infirmières, Université Laval, Québec, Canada Axe Vieillissement, Centre de recherche FRSQ du Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire de Québec, Canada
Pierre-Hugues Carmichael
Affiliation:
Axe Vieillissement, Centre de recherche FRSQ du Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire de Québec, Canada
*
La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à : / Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to: Philippe Landreville, Ph.D. École de psychologie Université Laval Pavillon Félix-Antoine-Savard 2325 rue des Bibliothèques Québec, QC G1V 0A6 ([email protected])

Abstract

Several measuring devices are available to assess specific behavioural problems of dementia patients residing in nursing homes but only a few have been translated and validated in French. This study’s main objective was to determine the factorial structure of the French version of the Nursing Home Behavior Problem Scale (NHBPS) with people suffering from dementia. A secondary objective was to document the variables associated with the global score of the NHBPS and the underlying dimensions of the instrument. Participants (n = 155) were diagnosed with dementia and resided in three nursing homes and a hospital’s long-term care unit. The presence of behavioural problems and other characteristics were assessed by two nurses. A factor analysis revealed five key dimensions in the francophone version of the questionnaire. Several variables were associated with the total score of the NHBPS and its five underlying dimensions. Although the factorial solution of the French version of the NHBPS is similar to the English versions, our results also show differences that may depend on methodological characteristics.

Résumé

Plusieurs instruments de mesure sont disponibles afin d’évaluer les troubles de comportement des personnes atteintes de démence en centre d’hébergement mais peu d’entre eux ont été traduits et validés en français. Cette étude a pour objectif principal de déterminer la structure factorielle de la version française du Nursing Home Behavior Problem Scale (NHBPS) auprès de personnes atteintes de démence et résidant en centre d’hébergement. Un objectif secondaire est de documenter les variables associées au score global de même qu’aux différents facteurs du NHBPS. Les participants (n=155) ont reçu un diagnostic de démence et sont usagers de trois centres d’hébergement et d’une unité de soins de longue durée d’un hôpital. La présence de troubles de comportement et d’autres caractéristiques ont été évalués par deux infirmières. Une analyse factorielle révèle cinq principales dimensions à notre échelle francophone. Également, plusieurs variables sont associées au score total du NHBPS et à ses différentes dimensions sous-jacentes. Bien que la solution factorielle de la version française du NHBPS est similaire à celles des versions anglaises, nos résultats montrent aussi des différences qui peuvent dépendre de facteurs méthodologiques.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Les auteurs remercient Lise Doucet et Christine Danjou pour leur collaboration. Cette étude a été rendue possible par le soutien financier du Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec, le Fonds de la recherche en sciences infirmières du Québec, la Fondation de l’Hôpital Saint-Sacrement et les Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada.

References

Références

Alexopoulos, G. S., Abrams, R. C., Young, R. C. & Shamoian, C. A. (1988). Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia. Biological Psychiatry, 23, 271284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Algase, D. L., Beck, C., Kolanowski, A., Whall, A., Berent, S., Richards, K., et al. (1996). Need-driven dementia-compromised behavior: An alternative view of disruptive behavior. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 11, 1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Manuel diagnostique et statistique des troubles mentaux (3ème édition, révisé). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Manuel diagnostique et statistique des troubles mentaux (4ème édition, révisé). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Bastien, C. H., Vallières, A. & Morin, C. M. (2001). Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Medicine, 2, 297307.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, M., Becker, R. & Gauthier, S. (1990). Validity and reliability of the dementia behavior disturbance scale. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 38, 221226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bickel, H. (1996). The Hierarchic Dementia Scale: Usage. International Psychogeriatrics, 8, 213224.Google Scholar
Blais, F. C., Gendron, L., Mimeault, V., et Morin, C. M. (1997). Évaluation de l’insomnie: validation de trois questionnaires. L’Encéphale, 23, 447453.Google Scholar
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L. & MacKenzie, R. C. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40, 373383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen-Mansfield, J. (2000). Nonpharmacological management of behavioral problems in persons with dementia: The TREA model. Alzheimer’s Care Quaterly, 1, 2234.Google Scholar
Cohen-Mansfield, J. & Libin, A. (2005). Verbal and physical non-aggressive agitated behaviors in elderly persons with dementia: Robustness of syndromes. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 39, 325332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, M. & Dastoor, D. P. (1987). A new hierarchic approach to the measurement of dementia. Psychosomatics, 28, 298304.Google Scholar
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crotty, M., Halbert, J., Giles, L. C., Birks, R., Lange, K. & Whitehead, C. H. (2004). Using the Nursing Home Behaviour Problem Scale in an Australian residential care setting. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 23, 150155.Google Scholar
De Winter, J. C. F., Dodou, D. & Wieringa, P. A. (2009). Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 147181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demonet, J. F., Doyon, B., Ousset, P. J., Puel, M., Mahagne, M. H., Cardebat, D., et al. (1990). Standardization of a modular and hierarchic cognitive evaluation scale applicable to dementia. A French version of the Hierarchic Dementia Scale. Revue de Neurologie, 146, 490501.Google Scholar
Deslauriers, S., Landreville, P., Dicaire, L. et Verreault, R. (2001).Validité et fidélité de l’Inventaire d’agitation de Cohen-Mansfield. Canadian Journal on Aging, 20, 373384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desrosiers, J., Bravo, G., Hébert, R. & Dubuc, N. (1995). Reliability of the revised functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF) for epidemiological research. Age and Ageing, 24, 402406.Google Scholar
D’Hoore, W., Bouckaert, A. & Tilquin, C. (1996). Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49, 14291433.Google Scholar
Fick, D. M., Agostini, J. V. & Inouye, S. K. (2002). Delirium superimposed on dementia: A systematic review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50, 17231732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkel, S., Silva, C. J. E., Cohen, G., Miller, S. & Sartorius, N. (1997). Behavioral and psychological signs and symptoms of dementia: A consensus statement on current knowledge and implications for research and treatment. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12, 10601061.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C. & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 14171432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hébert, R., Carrier, R. & Bilodeau, A. (1988). The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF): Description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age and Ageing, 17, 293302.Google Scholar
Hope, T., Keene, J., McShane, R. H., Fairburn, C. G. & Jacoby, R. (2001). Wandering in dementia: A longitudinal study. International Psychogeriatrics, 13, 137147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inouye, S. K., van Dyck, C. H., Alessi, C. A., Balkin, S., Siegal, A. P. & Horwitz, R. I. (1991). Clarifying confusion: The confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Annals of Internal Medicine, 113, 941948.Google Scholar
Kiely, D. K., Morris, J. N. & Algase, D. L. (2000). Resident caracteristics associated with wandering in nursing homes. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 5, 10131020.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, D. A., Steinberg, M. S., Galik, E., Steele, C., Sheppard, J. M., Warren, A., et al. (1999). Wandering behavior in community-residing persons with dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 13, 272279.Google Scholar
Korner, A., Lauritzen, L., Abelskov, K., Gulmann, N., Brodersen, A. M., Wedervang-Jensen, T., et al. (2006). The Geriatric Depression Scale and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia. A validity study. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 60, 360364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lajeunesse, C., & Villeneuve, A. (1989). Tardive dyskinesia. After more than 2 decades. L’Encephale, 15, 471485.Google ScholarPubMed
Landreville, P., Vézina, J., et Bédard, A. (2005). Symptômes comportementaux et psychologiques de la démence: agitation verbale, comportements agressifs et errance. In Landreville, P., Rousseau, J., Vézina, J., et Voyer, P. (Eds.), Symptômes comportementaux et psychologiques de la démence (pp. 109145). St-Hyacinthe: Edisem.Google Scholar
Laplante, J., Cole, M., McCusker, J., Singh, S. & Ouimet, M-A. (2005). Confusion Assessment Method: validation d’une version française. Perspective infirmière, 3, 1222.Google Scholar
Lemay, M. & Landreville, P. (Eds.). (2010). Verbal agitation in dementia: A manifestation of a need for comfort? (Vol. 72). Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Michel, M., Capriz, F., Gentry, A., Filbet, M., Gauquelin, S., et Lefebre-Chapiro, L. (2000). Doloplus-2, une échelle comportementale de la douleur validée chez la personne âgée. La Revue de Gériatrie, 25, 155160.Google Scholar
Monette, J., Champoux, N., Monette, M., Fournier, L., Wolfson, C., Sourial, N., et al. (2008). Effect of an interdisciplinary educational program on antipsychotic prescribing among nursing home residents with dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23, 574579.Google Scholar
Mulaik, S. A. (2010). Foundations of factor analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall press.Google Scholar
Neville, C. & Byrne, G. (2001). Behaviour rating scales for older people with dementia. Which is the best for use by nurses? Australasian Journal on Ageing, 20, 166172.Google Scholar
Pichot, P., Samuel-Lajeunesse, B., Blanc, J., Galopin, D., et Selva, G. (1969). Une échelle d’observation du comportement en salle des malades hospitalisés: la NOSIE-30. Revue de psychologie appliquée, 19, 3543.Google Scholar
Rader, J., Doan, J. & Schwab, M. (1985). How to decrease wandering. A form of agenda behavior. Geriatric Nursing, 6, 196199.Google Scholar
Ray, W. A., Taylor, J. A., Lichtenstein, M. J. & Meador, K. G. (1992).The Nursing Home Behavior Problem Scale. Journal of Gerontology, 47, M9M16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ray, W. A., Taylor, J. A., Meador, K. G., Lichtenstein, M. J., Griffin, M. R., Fought, R., et al. (1993). Reducing antipsychotic drug use in nursing homes: A controlled trial of provider education. Archives of Internal Medicine, 153, 713721.Google Scholar
Sisco, F., Taurel, M., Lafont, V., Bertogliati, C., Girordana, J. Y., Braccini, T., et al. (2000). Troubles de comportement chez les sujets déments en institution: évaluation à partir de l’Inventaire Neuropsychiatrique pour les équipes soignantes. L’Année gérontologique, 14, 151171.Google Scholar
Vallerand, R. (1989). Toward a methodology for the transcultural validation of psychological questionnaires: Implications for research in the French language. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 30, 662680.Google Scholar
Voyer, P., Richard, S., Doucet, L. & Carmichael, P-H. (2009). Predisposing factors associated with delirium among demented long-term care residents. Clinical Nursing Research, 18, 153171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voyer, P., Richard, S., Doucet, L., Cyr, N. & Carmichael, P-H. (2011). Precipitating factors associated with delirium among long-term care residents with dementia. Applied Nursing Research, 24, 171178.Google Scholar
Voyer, P., Verreault, R., Azizah, G. M., Desrosiers, J., Champoux, N. & Bédard, A. (2005). Prevalence of physical and verbal aggressive behaviours and associated factors among older adults in long-term care facilities. BMC Geriatrics, 5, 113.Google Scholar
Wary, B. (1999). Doloplus-2, une échelle pour évaluer la douleur. Soins Gérontologie, 19, 2527.Google Scholar
Zuidema, S. U., Derksen, E., Verhey, F. R. J. & Koopmans, R. T. (2007). Prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in a large sample of Dutch nursing home patients with dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22, 632638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwakhalen, S. M. G., Hamers, J. P. H. & Berger, M. P. F. (2006). The psychometric quality and clinical usefulness of three pain assessment tools for elderly people with dementia. Pain, 126, 210220.Google Scholar