Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:31:13.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Portrayal of the Elderly in Drug Advertisements: A Factor in Inappropriate Prescribing?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Joel Lexchin
Joel Lexchin
Affiliation:
Toronto Western Hospital
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Inappropriate prescribing to the elderly is a serious problem and is one factor contributing to adverse drug reactions in this group. It is well-known that reliance on promotional literature for prescribing information leads to less appropriate prescribing. This study surveyed ads in two major Canadian medical journals which portrayed people who appeared to be over 65 years of age. The elderly were shown in just over 7 per cent of the ads. These ads did not appear to take into account the special drug needs of the elderly. Ads featuring the elderly could lead to inappropriate prescribing because of their pictorial content, their written content or a combination of both. Further research into this area is needed, specifically directed at factors which influence prescribing to the elderly. In the meantime physicians dealing with the elderly should critically analyse the message in drug advertisements and be aware of the risks of using them for therapeutic information.

Résumé

Le problème concernant les ordonnances contre-indiquées continue de prendre de l'ampleur et devient un des facteurs contribuant aux réactions néfastes que subissent les personnes âgées. De toute évidence, le médecin qui s'appuie sur les documents promotionnels pour rédiger une ordonnance sera porté à commettre plus d'erreurs. La présente étude se concentre sur deux revues médicales canadiennes importantes et elle examine les réclames publicitaires qui s'adressent aux personnes semblant avoir dépassé les 65 ans. Les gens âgés étaient représentés dans seulement 7 pour cent des annonces. Celles-ci ne semblaient pas tenir compte des besoins particuliers aux personnes âgées en ce qui a trait aux médicaments. Les textes et les illustrations contenus à l'intérieur de ces annonces pourraient être une des causes à l'origine des ordonnances contre-indiquées. Des études de recherche plus approfondies devraient être mises au point dans le but d'examiner plus attentivementles facteurs qui influencent le médecin lorsqu'il décide de rédiger une ordonnance pour un patient âgé. Entretemps, par égard à ce segment de leur pratique, les médecins devraient analyser prudemment les messages publicitaires et demeurer conscients des risques encourus lorsqu'ils s'en servent à titre d'information thérapeutique.

Keywords

Drug AdvertisementsInappropriate PrescribingAdverse Drug ReactionsPhysicians
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , Autumn/automne 1990 , pp. 296 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1)Skoll, SL, August, RJ, Johnson, GE: Drug prescribing for the elderly in Saskatchewan during 1976. Can Med Assoc J 1979, 121: 1074–1081.Google ScholarPubMed
(2)Danforth, DH, Hlynka, JN, Soon, JA: Drug usage review. Part three: implementing the long-term care program. Can Pharmaceut J 1982, 115: 9–12.Google ScholarPubMed
(3)Robertson, D, Danforth, DH: Issues in geriatric drug therapy. Can Fam Physician 1987, 33: 2605–2609.Google ScholarPubMed
(4)Lexchin, J: Prescribing to the elderly: a review of the English language Canadian literature. Can Fam Physician 1989, 35: 1613–1617.Google Scholar
(5)Ogilvie, RI, Ruedy, J: An educational program in digitalis therapy. JAMA 1972, 222: 50–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(6)Asthana, S, Sood, VP: Prescribing for the elderly: one hospital's experience. Geriatric Medicine (Canada), 1987, 3: 113–117.Google Scholar
(7)McKim, WA, Mishara, BL: Drugs and aging. Toronto: Butterworths, 1987.Google Scholar
(8)Naujoks, RE: Drug related admissions to a general medical ward. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Sept 1986.Google Scholar
(9)Ogilvie, RI, Ruedy, J: Adverse drug reactions during hospitalization. Can Med Assoc J 1967, 97: 1450–1457.Google ScholarPubMed
(10)Becker, MH, Stolley, PD, Lasagna, L, McEvilla, JD, Sloane, LM: Differential education concerning therapeutics and resultant physician prescribing patterns. J Med Educ 1972, 47: 118–127.Google ScholarPubMed
(11)Linn, LS, Davis, MS: Physicians' orientation toward the legitimacy of drug use and their preferred source of new drug information. Soc Sci Med 1972, 6: 199–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(12)Mapes, R.Aspects of British general practitioners' prescribing. Med Care 1977, 15: 371–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(13)Haayer, F: Rational prescribing and sources of information. Soc Sci Med 1982, 16: 2017–2023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(14)Blondeel, L, Cannoodt, L, De Meyere, M, Proesmans, H: Prescription behaviour of 358 Flemish general practitioners. Presented at the International Society of General Medicine, Prague, 1987. (Available from: Projekt Farmaka J. Ver–vaenestraat 14, 9218 Gent, Belgium).Google Scholar
(15)Chapman, S: Advertising and psychotropic drugs: the place of myth in ideological reproduction. Soc Sci Med 1979, 13A: 751–764.Google Scholar
(16)Smith, MC: Portrayal of the elderly in prescription drug advertising: a pilot study. The Gerontologist 1976, 16: 329–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(17)Avorn, J, Chen, M, Hartley, R: Scientific versus commercial sources of influence on the prescribing behavior of physicians. Am J Med 1982, 73: 4–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(18)Hall, KW, Parker, WA: Physician's view of the pharmacist's professional role. Can Pharmaceut J 1976, 109: 311–314.Google Scholar
(19)Fassold, RW, Gowdey, CW: A survey of physicians' reactions to drug promotion. Can Med Assoc J 1968, 98: 701–705.Google ScholarPubMed
(20)Gowdey, CW, Fassold, RW: Survey of doctors' reactions to the promotion of new drugs. Can Pharmaceut J 1968, 101: 344–350.Google Scholar
(21)Parker, WA: The compendium of pharmaceuticals and specialties as a drug information resource for treatment of acute drug overdose. Can Fam Physician 1979, 25: 211–215.Google Scholar
(22)Parboosingh, J, Lockyer, J, McDougall, G, Chugh, U: How physicians make changes in their clinical practice: a study of physicians' perception of factors that facilitate this process. Ann R Coll Phys Surg Can 1984, 17: 429–435.Google Scholar
(23)Woods, D: PMAC to spend almost $1 million annually to reach “stakeholders”. Can Med Assoc J 1986, 134: 1387–1389.Google Scholar
(24)Aoki, FY, Hildahi, VK, Large, GW, Mitenko, PA, Sitar, DS: Aging and heavy drug use: a prescription survey in Manitoba. J Chronic Dis 1983, 36: 75–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(25)Studnicki–Gizbert, D, Segal, HJ: Effectiveness of selected pharmacy services in long term care facilities. J Soc Admin Pharm 1983, 1: 187–193.Google Scholar
(26)Dixon, AS: Drug use in family practice: a personal study. Can Fam Physician 1978, 24: 345–353.Google Scholar
(27)Harding, J, Wolf, N, Chan, G: A socio–demographic profile of people prescribed mood–modifiers in Saskatchewan. Regina: Saskatchewan Alcoholism Commission, 1978.Google Scholar
(28)Anon. The choice of antimicrobial drugs. Med Letter 1988, 30: 39.Google Scholar
(29)Larochelle, P, Bass, MJ, Birkett, NJ, De Champlain, J, Myers, MG: Recommendations from the consensus conference on hypertension in the elderly. Can Med Assoc J 1986, 135: 741–741–745.Google ScholarPubMed