Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:20:32.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pension Reform in Canada*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Ken Battle
Ken Battle
Affiliation:
Caledon Institute of Social Policy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the mid-1980s, Canada's social security system has been undergoing a profound transformation. Virtually every major social program has been or is in the process of being changed. The pension system is no exception: every element of Canada's complex retirement income system, both public and private, has been altered in some manner, in some cases profoundly. This paper analyses the various changes to Old Age Security and other elderly benefits under the Mulroney and Chrétien governments, culminating in the new Seniors Benefit. The Conservatives used “social policy by stealth” to make significant changes to elderly benefits, paving the way for the Liberals' plan to rationalize programs into a single income-tested Seniors Benefit. Arguments for and against the Seniors Benefit are considered. The Canada Pension Plan also is under scrutiny by the federal and provincial governments, which are considering two routes to reform — a move from paygo to partial funding, including a more rapid ramp-up in contribution rates, and various options to trim benefits.

Résumé

Depuis le milieu des années 1980, le système de sécurité sociale du Canada a subi de profondes transformations. Pratiquement tous les programmes importants ont été modifiés ou sont en train de l'être. Le système de retraite ne fait pas exception: chaque élément du système complexe de revenu à la retraite canadien, public ou privé, a été modifié, et parfois en profondeur. Cet article analyse les divers changements apportés au système de Sécurité de la vieillesse et aux autres avantages pour les aînés sous les gouvernements de Mulroney et de Chrétien, ce qui a donné lieu au nouveau régime de Prestation aux aînés. Les Conservateurs avaient eu recours à la technique «furtive» pour apporter des modifications importantes aux avantages des aînés, ouvrant la voie à la rationalisation des programmes par les Libéraux en une seule prestation liée au revenu. Les avantages et désavantages du régime de Prestations aux aînés sont passés en revue. Les gouvernements fédéral et provinciaux examinent le Régime de pension du Canada à la loupe et envisagent deux modes de réforme, le passage du financement par répartition au financement partiel, ce qui donnerait lieu à une accélération plus rapide des taux de contributions, et d'autres options pour élaguer les prestations.

Keywords

PensionsSeniors BenefitElderly BenefitsRetirement Income SystemPensionsprestations aux aînésprestations aux personnes âgéessystème de revenue de retraite
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , Fall/Automne 1997 , pp. 519 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, R. (1995). CLC policy/discussion paper on pensions (draft). Ottawa: Canadian Labour Congress.Google Scholar
Battle, K. (under the pseudonym Grattan Gray). (1990). Social policy by stealth. Policy Options, 11(2).Google Scholar
Battle, K. (1993). Thinking the unthinkable: A targeted, not universal, old age pension. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.Google Scholar
Battle, K. (1996a). Redesign of old age pensions. In Roundtable on Canada's aging society and retirement income system. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.Google Scholar
Battle, K. (1996b). A new old age pension. In Banting, Keith and Boadway, Robin (Eds.), Reform of retirement income policy: International and Canadian perspectives. Kingston: School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, 1997.Google Scholar
Business Committee on Pension Policy. (1982). Pension policy — Issues and positions.Google Scholar
Caledon Institute of Social Policy. (1996a). Roundtable on Canada's aging society and retirement income system. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Caledon Institute of Social Policy. (1996b). Pension facts. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women. (1981). Pension reform with women in mind. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. (1981). Pensions: Public solutions vs. private interests. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute of Actuaries. (1993). Canadian retirement income social security programs. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute of Actuaries. (1995). Troubled tomorrows — The report of the Canadian Institute of Actuaries' Task Force on Retirement Savings. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canadian Labour Congress. (1982). The CLCproposal for pension reform. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canadian Labour Congress. (1995). The upcoming debate on public pensions: Issues as seen by the federal government, The Reform party, and the CLC. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canadian Life and Health Association, Inc. (1981). A national pension system. Toronto.Google Scholar
Coyne, A. (1994). Let's create a nation of savers. Globe and Mail, August 17, 1994.Google Scholar
Coyne, A. (1996). Martin dances with grey wolves. Globe and Mail, March 14, 1996.Google Scholar
Department of Finance Canada. (1995). Budget plan 1995. Ottawa: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada.Google Scholar
Economic Council of Canada. (1979). One in three: Pensions for Canadians to 2030. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Federal and Provincial Governments. (1996). An information paper for consultations on the Canada Pension Plan. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Frenken, H. (1995). Capitalizing on RRSPs. Canadian Economic Observer, 8(12). Ottawa: Minister of Industry.Google Scholar
Gallup, Poll. (1994). Percentage who are confident they will receive old age security and Canada/Quebec pension plans, October 1994.Google Scholar
Government of Canada. (1982). Better pensions for Canadians. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.Google Scholar
Government of Canada. (1994). Government of Canada tax expenditures. Ottawa: Department of Finance Canada.Google Scholar
Government of Canada. (1996). The seniors benefit: Securing the future. Ottawa: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada.Google Scholar
Myles, J. (1994). Old wine in new bottles: Privatizing old age pensions. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.Google Scholar
National Action Committee on the Status of Women. (1983). Pension reform: What women want. Toronto.Google Scholar
National Advisory Council on Aging. (1996). Federal pension reform. Ottawa.Google Scholar
National Council of Welfare. (1984a). A pension primer. Ottawa: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
National Council of Welfare. (1984b). Pension reform. Ottawa: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
National Council of Welfare. (1989). The 1989 budget and social policy. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.Google Scholar
National Council of Welfare. (1990). Pension reform. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.Google Scholar
Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions. (1995). Canada Pension Plan fifteenth actuarial report as at 31 December 1993. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Ottawa Citizen (1996). March 7, 1996.Google Scholar
Reform Party of Canada. (1995). Responsible social reform: Reforming Canada Pension Plan. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Revenue Canada, (various years). Taxation statistics. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.Google Scholar
Robson, W. (1996). Putting some gold in the golden years: Fixing the Canada Pension Plan. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on the Status of Pensions in Ontario. (1980a). Volume II Design for retirement. Toronto: Government of Ontario.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on the Status of Pensions in Ontario. (1980b). Volume V Ontario and the Canada Pension Plan. Toronto: Government of Ontario.Google Scholar
Shifrin, L. (1996). Married women bear greatest burden from changes to pensions. Ottawa Citizen, March 8, 1996.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. (1994). Pension plans in Canada. Ottawa: Minister of Industry, Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. (1995). Unpublished data on employer pension plan coverage provided to the author.Google Scholar
Task Force on Retirement Income Policy. (1980). The retirement income system in Canada: Problems and alternative policies for reform (1979). Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.Google Scholar
Townson, M. (1995a). Future directions and challenges of an aging workforce: Income security and retirement. Presentation to the Twelfth Annual McMaster Summer Institute on Gerontology, June 9, 1995.Google Scholar
Townson, M. (1995b). Our aging society: Preserving retirement incomes into the 21st Century. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.Google Scholar