Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:04:21.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Multi-focus Assessment Scale for Use With Frail Elderly Populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

M. Coval ,
D. Crockett ,
S. Holliday  and
W. Koch
M. Coval
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
D. Crockett
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
S. Holliday
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
W. Koch
Affiliation:
Health Sciences Centre Hospital
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports the development of a psychological assessment instrument for evaluating the deteriorated elderly patient. The instrument provides information on patient function in eight areas including communication abilities, cognitive status and mood. Analyses were undertaken to determine the psychometric properties of each component of the instrument. Examination of the means and standard deviations indicated that the full range was used for each scale. Examination of interrater reliability yielded values ranging from .92 to .99. Several indices that may be of use in evaluating the significance of change in test scores are also presented. Suggestions are also made for the application of this instrument in both clinical and research settings.

Résumé

La présente communication consiste en un rapport sur l'élaboration d'un instrument de mesure psychologique destiné à évaluer la détérioration chez le malade âgé. Cet instrument fournit des renseignements sur le fonctionnement du malade dans huit champs, parmi lesquels se trouvent la communication, l'état de la cognition, et l'humeur. Des analyses ont été faites en vue de déterminer les propriétés psychométriques de chacun des constituants de l'instrument. L'examen de la moyenne et de l'écart-type indique que toutes les valeurs sont utilisées dans chacune des échelles. L'examen de la fidélité entre juges livre les valeurs de 0,92 et 0,99. Divers indices susceptibles de fournir des indications utiles sur les changements survenant entre les cotes sont également présentés. Des applications de l'instrument à la clinique et à la recherche sont proposées.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 101 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cole, M.G., Dastoor, D.P. and Koszycki, D. (1983). The hierarchic dementia scale. Journal of Clinical Experimental Gerontology, 5, 219–234.Google Scholar
Coval, M.Holliday, S., Crockett, D. and Andersen, E. (1982). Assessing residents with English as a second language in an English language facility. Paper presented at the 1 lth Annual Scientific and Educational Meeting of the Canadian Association on Gerontology, Winnipeg, November.Google Scholar
Fillenbaum, G. and Smyer, M. (1981). The development, validity and reliability of the OARS Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire. Journal of Gerontology, 4, 428–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, D., Thompson, L. and Levy, S. (1980). Clinical psychological assessment of older adults. In Poon, L.W. (Ed.) Aging in the 1980s: Psychological Issues, Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Gurland, B. The assessment of the mental health status of older adults. (1980). In Birren, J. & Sloane, R.B. (Eds.), Handbook of Mental Health and Aging. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Gurland, B., Kuriansky, J., Sharpe, L., Simon, R., Stiller, R. and Birkett, P. (1977-1978). The comprehensive assessment and referral evaluation (CARE) - Rationale, development and reliability, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 8, 9–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, R.L., Goldfarb, A.I., Pollack, M. and Peck, A. (1960). Brief objective measures for the determination of mental status in the aged. American Journal of Psychiatry, 117, 326–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, R.G. (1983). On interpreting the several standard errors of the WHIS-R: some further tables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 5, 671–673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kozma, A. and Stones, M.J. (1980). The measurement of happiness: Development of the Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness (MUNSH). Journal of Gerontology, 35, 6, 906–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, M.P. (1971). The functional assessment of elderly people. Journal ofthe American Geriatrics Society, 19, 465–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, E. (1980). Cognitive assessment of the older adult. In Birren, J. & Sloane, R.B. (Eds.), Handbook of Aging and Mental Health, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Read, D. (1984). Things remembered: Places forgotten. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Scientific and Educational Meeting of the Canadian Association on Gerontology. Vancouver.Google Scholar