Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:43:52.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mortality Rates Five Years After Admission to a Long Term Care Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Gloria Gutman ,
Cheryl Jackson ,
Annette J. Stark  and
Brian McCashin
Gloria Gutman
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
Cheryl Jackson
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Annette J. Stark
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Brian McCashin
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On January 1, 1978, a new Long Term Care Program was introduced in British Columbia. Five levels of care are offered, any one of which may be provided at home or in a facility. This paper presents data from a longitudinal study of Program clients (N = 3516) in two health unit areas, one urban, one semi-rural. The period of analysis is five years from admission. By the end of the five years, 40.2 percent of clients had died; 35.0 percent were still in the Program; 24.7 percent had been discharged alive and were still alive. This paper focuses on the decedents.

It was established that approximately half of the males and half of those aged 75 or over at admission were deceased within five years of admission. Regardless of level of care at admission, at least one-third had died in the five year period. More than one-third of decedents did not change level or location of service prior to death.

While these data may assist care providers in identifying high risk clients, probably the most provocative finding was the similarity in the proportion and pattern of deaths among new clients admitted to care at home and those admitted to facility.

Résumé

Le ler janvier 1978, un nouveau Programme de soins à long terme a été introduit en Colombie britannique. Cinq niveaux de sois y sont offerts et peuvent être administrés à domicile ou dans le cadre d'un service. La présente communication présente les données d'une étude longitudinale des clients du programme (N = 3516) dans deux districts sanitaires, l'un urbain, l'autre rural. La periode couverte comprend 5 ans après leur admission. À la fin de 5 ans, 40,2% des patients étaient morts; 35,0% étaient vivants et participaient encore au programme; 24,7% avaient obtenu leur congé. Le rapport portera sur les patients qui sont morts pendant leur participation au programme.

Il a été constaté que, approximant demi des hommes et demi des patients âgés de 75 ans ou plus à l'admission étaient mort dans 5 ans après leur admissions. Peu importe le niveau de soins auquel ils avaients été, au moins les tiers des patients étaient morts pendant la période de 5 ans. Plus d'un tiers qui sont morts n'avaient pas changé de niveau de soins ou d'établissement avant leur décès.

Pendant que les recueillies pouvant aider les donneurs de soins à identifier les clients qui présentent des risques élevés, probablement ces résultats plus provoquant était la similarité de la proportion et le modèle de morts des patients qui avaient été admis initialement à des éstablissements et de ceux qui recevaient des soins à la maison.

Keywords

Long Term CareMortalityHealth Care Planning
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Spring/Printemps 1986 , pp. 9 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Ministry of Health, Province of British Columbia. Introduction to the Program for Long-Term Care. Victoria, B.C.: 1978.Google Scholar
2Bainbridge, J.British Columbia's Long-Term Care Program: The first two years. Health Management Forum 1980; 1: 28–36.Google Scholar
3Gutman, GM, Stark, AJ, Witney, G and McCashin, B. Deaths within the first year of admission to long term care. Canadian Journal on Aging 1982; 1(3–4): 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Liu, K, and Manton, KG. The characteristics and utilization pattern of an admission cohort of nursing home patients. Gerontologist 1983; 23(1), 92–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Hunt, ME, Feldt, A, Mairans, R, Pastalan, J. and Vakalo, K.Retirement communities: an American original. Journal of Housing for the Elderly 1983; 1(3–4): whole issue.Google Scholar
6Pynoos, J.Continuum of care retirement communities. Generations 1985; 9: 31–33.Google Scholar
7Collot, C, Jani-le Bris, H. and Ridoux, A.Towards an Improvement in Self-reliance of the Elderly—Innovation and New Guidelines for the Future. Report for Commission of the European Communities. Paris: Centre de Liaison d'Etude, d'Information et de Recherche sur les Problèmes des Personnes Agées, November, 1982, p. 34.Google Scholar
8Gutman, MG. Issues and findings related to multi-level accommodation for seniors. Journal of Gerontology 1978; 33(4): 592–600.Google Scholar
9Gutman, MG. The long-term impact of multi-level, multi-service accommodation for seniors. Paper presented at the XIII International Congress of Gerontology, New York N.Y., July 12–17, 1985.Google Scholar
10Woods Gordon Management Consultants. Multi-Level Care Facilities: Evaluation of Models for Alberta. Volume 1, Final Report of a study conducted for the Department of Hospitals and Medical Care, Province of Alberta, September, 1981.Google Scholar
11Mackeprang, B, and Bentzon, MW. Some aspects concerning admittance to and accommodation in geriatric institutions housing persons with varying degrees of need for care. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine 1978; 6: 59–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Mackeprang, B, and Bentzon, MW. Minimum variability in the need for care in geriatric institutions. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine 1978; 6: 63–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Bourestom, N, and Pastalan, L.The effects of relocation on the elderly: a reply to Borup, JH., Gallego DT., and Heffernan PG. Gerontologist 1981; 21(1): 4–7.Google Scholar
14Pastalan, LA. Report on Pennsylvania Nursing Home Relocation Program. In terim research findings. Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor: 1976.Google Scholar
15Mills, SR. PREP—A preparation programme designed to minimize the stress of institutional relocation on the elderly. Unpublished Masters thesis, Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 1978.Google Scholar
16Grant, PR, and Gutman, GM. Self-induced dependency, learned helplessness and relocation stress: a new kind of intervention. In: Crawford, J. (Ed.) Canadian Gerontological Collection III. Winnipeg: Canadian Association on Gerontology, 1981.Google Scholar