Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:18:25.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Model of Consumer Participation: The Canadian Breast Cancer Initiative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2023

Jean Parboosingh*
Affiliation:
Health Canada
Sylvie Stachenko
Affiliation:
Health Canada
Suzanne Inhaber
Affiliation:
Health Canada
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to:/Les demandes de reproduction doivent être adressées à: Jean Parboosingh, Disease Prevention Division, Health Canada, Jeanne Mance Building, Tunney's Pasture, Postal Locator 1905C2, Ottawa, ON K1A 1B4
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The issue of linking research and policy is not unique to health care of the elderly; it has been articulated by numerous stakeholder groups, including those with specific diseases, such as breast cancer. A method of enhancing these links is now being systematically addressed in the Canadian Breast Cancer Initiative with the input of women with breast cancer. The Initiative consists of a number of components and demonstrates a model of consumer participation at multiple levels in setting the agenda for research and policy development, thus enhancing accountability in the transfer of research findings into policy. The concept of consumer participation in linking research and policy is transferable to other diseases and other population groups, such as seniors.

Résumé

Résumé

La question de l'établissement d'un lien entre la recherche et les politiques n'est pas unique au secteur des soins de santé des ainés; elle a été mise de l'avant par de nombreux groupes d'intervenants, y compris ceux chargés de maladies bien précises comme le cancer du sein. Une façon d'améliorer ces liens fait présentement l'objet d'une étude systématique entreprise dans le cadre de l'lnitiative canadienne sur le cancer du sein avec l'apport de femmes ayant le cancer du sein. L'initiative comprend un certain nombre de volets et se veut un modèle de participation du consommateur, á divers paliers, á l'établissement du programme de recherche et d'élaboration de politiques, et partant, permet d'améliorer la responsabilité en matière de transformation des constatations de la recherche en politiques. Cette notion de participation du consommateur á l'établissement d'un lien entre la recherche et les politiques peut être appliquée á d'autres maladies et a d'autres groupes démographiques, dont les ainés.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1997

References

Powell, M., Faghfoury, N., Hill, K., Nyenhuis P. Fostering Public Participation. In: Knowledge Development for Health Promotion: A Call for Action. Health Services and Promotion Branch Working Paper. Minister of Supply and Services 1989 Cat. No. H39-147/1989E.Google Scholar
Zakus, J.D.L., Hastings, J.E.F.. Public Involvement in Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. In: Knowledge Development for Health Promotion: A Call for Action. Health Services and Promotion Branch Working Paper. Minister of Supply and Services 1989 Cat. No. H39-147/1989E.Google Scholar
Alford, R.R.. Health Care Politics: Ideological and Interest Group Barriers to Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning and Policy Change: An Advocacy Coalition Framework. Knowledge, Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1987; 8(4):649-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, C. A manager's guide to consumers. Health Services Journal 1995; 28-29.Google Scholar
Charles, C., DeMaio S. Lay participation in health care decision making: A conceptual framework. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1993; 18(4):881-904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachlis, M., Kushner C. Strong Medicine: How to Save Canada's Health Care System. Toronto: Harper Collins Publishers Ltd, 1994.Google Scholar
A Reform Centred on the Citizen. Quebec: Ministry of Health and Social Services, 1990.Google Scholar
Premier's Commission on the Future of Health Care for Albertans. The Rainbow Report: Our Vision for Health. Edmonton: Queen's Printer for Alberta, 1989.Google Scholar
Report of the Ontario Health Review Panel. Toward a Shared Vision of Health in Ontario. Toronto: Ministry of Health, 1987.Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Commission on Directions in Health Care. Future Directions for Health care in Saskatchewan. Regina: Saskatchewan Department of Health, 1990.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J.L., Scattolon Y. Health Policy Planning: A Look at Consumer Involvement in Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Public Health 1995; 86(5):317-20.Google Scholar
Wennberg, J.E.. Better Policy to Promote the Evaluative Clinical Sciences. Quality Assurance in Health Care 1990; 2(1):21-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hack, T., Degner, L.F., Dyck, D.G.. Relationship between Preferences for Decisional Control and Illness among Women with Breast Cancer: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis. Social Science and Medicine 1994; 39(2):279-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassirer, J.P.. Incorporating Patients' Preferences into Medical Decisions (editorial). New England Journal of Medicine 1994; 330(26):1895-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
University of British Columbia Institute of Health Promotion Research. Study of participatory research in health promotion, The Royal Society of Canada, 1995.Google Scholar
Standing Committee on Health and Welfare, Social Affairs, Seniors and the Status of Women. Sub-Committee on the Status of Women. Report Breast Cancer: Unanswered Questions. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada, June 1992.Google Scholar
Report on the National Forum on Breast Cancer. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1994.Google Scholar
Iscoe, N.A., Goel, V., Wu K et al. Variation in breast cancer surgery in Ontario. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1994; 150(3):345-52.Google Scholar