Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:13:48.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

L’apport critique de l’évaluation de la communication dans le diagnostic précoce de l’apraxie primaire progressive de la parole

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2017

Liziane Bouvier ,
Laura Monetta ,
Robert Laforce Jr. ,
Louis Verret  and
Vincent Martel-Sauvageau
Liziane Bouvier
Affiliation:
Programme d’orthophonie. Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Laura Monetta
Affiliation:
Programme d’orthophonie. Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada. Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Québec (CRIUSMQ), Québec, Canada.
Robert Laforce Jr.
Affiliation:
Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire, Département des Sciences Neurologiques du CHU de Québec
Louis Verret
Affiliation:
Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire, Département des Sciences Neurologiques du CHU de Québec
Vincent Martel-Sauvageau*
Affiliation:
Programme d’orthophonie. Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada. Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CIRRIS), Québec
*
†La correspondance et les demandes de tirés à part doivent être adressées à : / Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to: Vincent Martel Sauvageau, Ph.D. Programme de maîtrise en orthophonie Département de réadaptation Université Laval, 1050 avenue de la médecine bureau VND-4477 Québec, QC G1V 0A6 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAoS) is a neurodegenerative syndrome characterized by speech apraxia at its onset; as it progresses, it often evolves into total mutism. Even though this syndrome is increasingly recognized, its early differential diagnostic is still complex. The objective of this study was to illustrate why a fine evaluation of speech and language is essential for the differential diagnosis of PPAoS. This longitudinal case study presents the progression of a PPAoS patient over a period of 5 years. Periodic neurological and speech-language assessments were carried out to follow the progression of neurological, memory, language and speech symptoms. The different diagnostic labels established over time were also reported. The evolution of the patient’s communication profile was characterized by a preservation of language components and episodic memory, in parallel with a progressive deterioration of speech which gradually reduced intelligibility, and was associated with signs of spasticity, resulting in a complete anarthria. This case study sheds light upon the evolution of a patient with PPAoS. A better understanding of the clinical profile and progression of PPAoS is necessary in order to improve early diagnosis and adequate care for these patients.

Résumé

L’apraxie primaire progressive de la parole (APPP) est un syndrome neurodégénératif dans lequel l’apraxie de la parole est le symptôme initial, évoluant souvent jusqu’à un mutisme total. Malgré une reconnaissance grandissante de ce syndrome, son diagnostic différentiel précoce demeure complexe. L’objectif de cette étude est d’illustrer l’importance de l’évaluation fine de la parole et du langage dans l’établissement du diagnostic différentiel de l’APPP. Cette étude de cas unique présente de façon longitudinale le parcours évolutif d’un cas d’APPP pendant 5 ans. Des évaluations périodiques en neurologie et en orthophonie permettent de suivre l’évolution des aspects neurologiques, de la mémoire, du langage et de la parole. Les différentes étiquettes diagnostiques posées à travers le temps sont également rapportées. L’évolution du profil communicationnel de la patiente est caractérisée par une préservation des composantes langagières ainsi que de la mémoire épisodique, parallèlement à l’atteinte progressive de la parole, se traduisant par une réduction grandissante de l’intelligibilité et par des indices de spasticité, évoluant jusqu’à une anarthrie complète. Cette étude de cas met en lumière un exemple d’évolution d’APPP. Une meilleure connaissance du profil clinique et évolutif de l’APPP facilitera le diagnostic précoce et la prise en charge adéquate de ces patients.

Keywords

speech apraxiadifferential diagnosisspeech disorderneurodegenerative diseaseanarthriaagingApraxie de la parolediagnostic différentieltrouble de la paroletrouble neurodégénératifanarthrievieillissment
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 50 - 59
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Les auteurs tiennent à remercier GS pour sa collaboration indéfectible aux évaluations, de même que les équipes de la CEO et de la Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire du CHU de Québec. Cette recherche n’a pas reçu de financement spécifique de la part d’agences publiques, commerciales ou caritatives. Les auteurs n’ont pas de conflit d’intérêt à déclarer.

References

Références

Ballard, K. J., Azizi, L., Duffy, J. R., McNeil, M. R., Halaki, M., O’Dwyer, N. et al. (2016). A predictive model for diagnosing stroke-related apraxia of speech. Neuropsychologia, 81, 129–139. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballard, K. J., Savage, S., Leyton, C. E., Vogel, A. P., Hornberger, M., & Hodges, J. R. (2014). Logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production. PLoS ONE, 9(2), 1–15. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbeau, E., Didic, M., Tramoni, E., Felician, O., Joubert, S., Sontheimer, A. et al. (2004). Evaluation of visual recognition memory in MCI patients. Neurology, 62(8), 1317–1322. http://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000120548.24298.DB.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Béland, R., & Lecours, A. R. (1990). The mt-86 β aphasia battery: A subset of normative data in relation to age and level of school education. Aphasiology, 4(5), 439–462. http://doi.org/10.1080/02687039008248786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, R., Lecours, A. R., Giroux, F., & Bois, M. (1993). The MT-86 β aphasia battery: A subset of normative data in relation to age and level of school education (Part II). Aphasiology, 7(4), 359–382. http://doi.org/10.1080/02687039308249516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergeron, D., Verret, L., Potvin, O., & Duchesne, S. (2016). When the left brain’s away, the right will play–Emergent artistic proficiency in primary progressive apraxia of speech. Cortex, (76), 125–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bilodeau-Mercure, M., & Tremblay, P. (2016). Age differences in sequential speech production: Articulatory and physiological factors. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 64(11), 177–182. http://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botha, H., Duffy, J. R., Strand, E. A., Machulda, M. M., Whitwell, J. L., & Josephs, K. A. (2014). Nonverbal oral apraxia in primary progressive aphasia and apraxia of speech. Neurology, 82(19), 1729–1735. http://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brodtmann, A., Pemberton, H., Darby, D., & Vogel, A. P. (2016). Diagnostic distortions: A case report of progressive apraxia of speech. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 53(1), 79–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callahan, B. L., Macoir, J., Hudon, C., Bier, N., Chouinard, N., Cossette-Harvey, M., et al. (2010). Normative data for the pyramids and palm trees test in the quebec-French population. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(3), 212–217. http://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acq013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffy, J. R., Strand, E. A., Clark, H., Machulda, M., Whitwell, J. L., & Josephs, K. A. (2015). Primary progressive apraxia of speech: Clinical features and acoustic and neurologic correlates. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(2), 88–100. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffy, J. R., Strand, E. A., & Josephs, K. A. (2014). Motor speech disorders associated with primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology, 28(8–9), 1004–1017. http://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2013.869307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffy, J. R., Strand, E. A., Machulda, M. M., Whitwell, J. L., & Josephs, K. A. (2014). Quantitative application of the primary progressive aphasia consensus criteria. Neurology, 82(13), 1119–1126.Google Scholar
Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Hillis, A. E., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S. F., et al. (2011). Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology, 76(11), 1006–1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, N. L., Leonard, C., Tang-Wai, D. F., Black, S., Chow, T. W., Scott, C. J. M. et al. (2016). Lack of frank agrammatism in the nonfluent agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders EXTRA, 6(3), 407–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, D., & Patterson, K. (1992). The Pyramids and Palm Trees Test: A test for semantic access from words and pictures. Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company. Joanette, Y., Ska, B. et Côté, H. (2004). Protocole Montréal d’évaluation de la communication (MEC). Isbergues, France: Ortho-Edition.Google Scholar
Josephs, K. A., Duffy, J. R., Strand, E. A., Machulda, M. M., Senjem, M. L., Lowe, V. J. et al. (2013). Syndromes dominated by apraxia of speech show distinct characteristics from agrammatic PPA. Neurology, 81(4), 337–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Josephs, K. A., Duffy, J. R., Strand, E. A., Machulda, M. M., Senjem, M. L., Master, A. V. et al. (2012). Characterizing a neurodegenerative syndrome: primary progressive apraxia of speech. Brain, 135(5), 1522–1536. Retrieved from http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/135/5/1522.abstract.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, Y., Duffy, J. R., & Josephs, K. A. (2013). Primary progressive aphasia and apraxia of speech. Semin Neurol, 33(4), 342–347. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1359317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leyton, C. E., & Hodges, J. R. (2014). Differential diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia variants using the international criteria. Aphasiology, 28(8–9), 909–921. http://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2013.869306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macoir, J., Beaudoin, C., et Bluteau, J. (2008). Le test de dénomination d’images de Québec: TDQ-60. Québec: Université Laval.Google Scholar
Macoir, J., Gauthier, C., Jean, C., & Potvin, O. (2016). BECLA, a new assessment battery for acquired deficits of language: Normative data from Quebec-French healthy younger and older adults. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 361, 220–228. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.01.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mesulam, M.-M., Weineke, C. T., Rogalski, E., & Weintraub, S. (2012). Quantitative classification of primary progrssive aphasia at early and mild impairment stages. Brain, 135(5), 1537–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monetta, L., Légaré, A., Macoir, J., et Wilson, W. (2016). Questionnaire d’évaluation sémantique du Québec (QeSQ). Québec: Université Laval.Google Scholar
Nespoulous, J. L., Lecours, A. R., & Lafond, D. (1986). MT-86-Protocole Montréal-Toulouse d’examen linguistique de l’aphasie. Isbergues, France: Ortho Edition.Google Scholar
Ogar, J. M., Dronkers, N. F., Brambati, S. M., Miller, B. L., & Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2007). Progressive nonfluent aphasia and its characteristic motor speech deficits. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 21(4), S23–S30. http://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0b013e31815d19fe.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staiger, A. & Ziegler, W. (2004). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech. Brain and Language, 88(1), 148–159. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00296-7.Google Scholar
Strand, E. A., Duffy, J. R., Clark, H. M., & Josephs, K. (2014). The apraxia of speech rating scale: A tool for diagnosis and description of apraxia of speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 51, 43–50. http://doi.org/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.06.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenberghe, R. (2016). Classification of the primary progressive aphasias: Principles and review of progress since 2011. Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy, 8(16), 1–9. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-016-0185-y.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilson, S. M., Henry, M. L., Besbris, M., Ogar, J. M., Dronkers, N. F., Jarrold, W. et al. (2010). Connected speech production in three variants of primary progressive aphasia. Brain, 133(7), 2069–2088. Retrieved from http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/133/7/2069.abstract.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. (2000). Decision making in AAC intervention. In Beukelman, D., Yorkston, K. M. & Reichle, J. (Eds.), Augmentative communication for adults with acquired neurologic disabilities (pp. 55–82). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Yorkston, K. M., Beukelman, D. R., Strand, E. A., & Bell, K. R. (1999). Management of motor speech disorders in children and adults (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed inc.Google Scholar
Yunusova, Y., Green, J. R., Greenwood, L., Wang, J., Pattee, G. L., & Zinman, L. (2012). Tongue movements and their acoustic consequences in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 64(2), 94–102. http://doi.org/10.1159/000336890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed