Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:38:17.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Graphs, Tables, and Scientific Illustrations: Visualisation as the Science of Seeing Gerontology*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2017

Linda T. Caissie ,
Claire Goggin  and
Lisa A. Best
Linda T. Caissie
Affiliation:
Department of Gerontology, St. Thomas University
Claire Goggin
Affiliation:
Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, St. Thomas University
Lisa A. Best*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick
*
†Correspondence and requests for reprints should be sent to / La correspondance et les demandes de tirés à part doivent être adressées à: Lisa A. Best, Ph.D. Department of Psychology University of New Brunswick P.O. Box 5050 100 Tucker Park Road Saint John, NB E2L 4L5 <[email protected]>
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Visual inscriptions (e.g., graphs, illustrations) are a defining feature of scientific discovery to aid in data analysis, interpretation, and communication (e.g., Latour, 1990; Lynch, 1985). Our purpose was to examine how visual inscriptions are used to present data in gerontology journals. We compared 357 articles sampled from 24 peer-reviewed gerontology journals published between 1995 and 2009. Approximately 11 per cent of page space was dedicated to data presentation with more page space occupied by tables (9.13%) than graphs (2.32%). Graph use in gerontology was lower than in psychology (6.6% of page space) and higher than in criminology and criminal justice (1.7% of page space). Following Latour (1990), we argue that visualisations provide an understandable summary of complex data by effectively presenting multifaceted results. When inscriptions are used in dissemination, researchers become less reliant on complex statistical jargon and can communicate easily with a diverse audience (researchers, health care practitioners, clients).

Résumé

Une caractéristique essentielle de la découverte scientifique est l’utilisation d’inscriptions visuelles (p. ex. graphiques, illustrations) facilitant l’analyse des données, leur interprétation et leur communication (p. ex. Latour, 1990 ; Lynch, 1985). L’objectif de cette recherche était d’examiner les types d’inscriptions visuelles utilisés pour la présentation de données dans les revues scientifiques en gérontologie. Nous avons comparé 357 articles publiés entre 1995 et 2009 qui ont été échantillonnés à partir de 24 revues de gérontologie avec comités de pairs. Approximativement 11 pour cent de l’espace d’impression était consacré à la présentation de données ; les tableaux occupaient comparativement plus d’espace (9,13 %) que les graphiques (2,32 %). L’utilisation des graphiques dans les articles en gérontologie était inférieure à celle observée pour les articles en psychologie (6,6 % de l’espace d’impression), mais supérieure à celle retrouvée en criminologie ou en justice criminelle (1,7 % de l’espace d’impression). À l’instar de Latour (1990), nous soutenons que les figures représentent un résumé accessible de données complexes, permettant ainsi une présentation efficace de résultats multidimensionnels. Lorsque les inscriptions visuelles sont utilisées dans la dissémination des résultats, les chercheurs deviennent moins dépendants du jargon statistique et peuvent communiquer plus aisément avec divers publics (chercheurs, professionnels de la santé, clients).

Keywords

aginggerontologyvisualization in sciencegraphstablesillustrationsenhancing communicationknowledge cumulationknowledge transfervieillissmentgérontologievisualisation en sciencegraphiquestableauxillustrationsamélioration de la communicationcumul des connaissancestransfert de connaissances
Type
Research Notes / Notes de recherché
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 536 - 548
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Taka Yamashita in providing us with some of the reference material used in the preparation of this article. Parts of this research were presented at the 42nd Annual Scientific and Educational Meeting of the Canadian Association on Gerontology (CAG) in Halifax, Nova Scotia, October 17-19, 2013.

References

Achenbaum, W. A. (1995). Crossing frontiers: Gerontology emerges as a science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Achenbaum, W. A. (2010). 2008 Kent Award Lecture: An historian interprets the future of gerontology. The Gerontologist, 50, 142–148.Google Scholar
Ahmed, M., & Boisvert, C. M. (2003). Enhancing communication through visual aids in clinical practice. American Psychologist, 58, 816–817.Google Scholar
Alkema, G. E., & Alley, D. E. (2006). Gerontology’s future: An integrative model for disciplinary advancement. The Gerontologist, 46, 574–582.Google Scholar
Andrews, G. J., Campbell, L., Denton, M., & McGilton, K. S. (2009). Gerontology in Canada: History, challenges, research. Ageing International, 34, 136–153.Google Scholar
Arsenault, D. J., Smith, L. D., & Beauchamp, E. (2006). Visual inscriptions in the scientific hierarchy: Mapping the “treasures of science”. Science Communication, 27, 376–428.Google Scholar
Bass, S. A. (2013). The state of gerontology: Opus one. The Gerontologist, 53, 534–542.Google Scholar
Best, L. A. (2005). An examination of drawings in philosophical transactions (1665 to present): The evolution of the scientific image. International Journal of the Book, 3, 45–54.Google Scholar
Best, L. A., Goggin, C., Buhay, D. N., Caissie, L. T., Boone, M., & Gaudet, D. (2016). Describing data using pictures: The use of visual inscriptions in science. In Pracana, C. & Wang, M. (Eds.), International psychological applications conference and trends: Proceedings. Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 296–298). Lisbon, PRT: World Institute for Advanced Research and Science.Google Scholar
Best, L. A., Smith, L. D., & Stubbs, D. A. (2001). Graph use in psychology and other sciences. Behavioural Processes, 54, 155–165.Google Scholar
Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, M. E., & Arvey, R. D. (2012). Meta-analysis and the development of knowledge. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 79–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleveland, W. S. (1984). Graphs in scientific publications. The American Statistician, 38, 261–269.Google Scholar
Cutler, S. J. (1995). The methodology of social scientific research in gerontology: Progress and issues. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 50B, S63–S64.Google Scholar
de Medeiros, K. (2014). Who “owns” gerontology? The importance of thinking beyond the sciences. The Gerontologist, 54, 723–727.Google Scholar
Draper, B., Low, L.-F., Withall, A., Vickland, V., & Ward, T. (2009). Translating dementia research into practice. International Psychogeriatrics, 21, S72–S80.Google Scholar
Fanjoy, L. P., MacNeill, A. L., & Best, L. A. (2012). The use of diagrams in science: An examination of trends in articles published in science between 1880 and 2010. In Cox, P., Plimmer, B., & Rodgers, P. (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference (pp. 303–305). Berlin, DEU: Springer.Google Scholar
Farkas, M., Jette, A. M., Tennstedt, S., Haley, S. M., & Quinn, V. (2003). Knowledge dissemination and utilization in gerontology: An organizing framework. The Gerontologist, 43, 47–56.Google Scholar
Fidler, F., Thomason, N., Cumming, G., Finch, S., & Leeman, J. (2004). Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can’t make them think: Statistical reform lessons from medicine. Psychological Science, 15, 119–126.Google Scholar
Funkhouser, H. G. (1937). Historical development of the graphical representation of statistical data. Osiris, 3, 269–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goggin, C., & Best, L. A. (2013). The use of scientific inscriptions in criminology and criminal justice journals: An analysis of publication trends between 1985 and 2009. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24, 517–535.Google Scholar
Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2007). Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24.Google Scholar
Graham, I. D., & Tetroe, J. (2007). CIHR research: How to translate health research knowledge into effective healthcare action. Healthcare Quarterly, 10, 20–22.Google Scholar
Hegarty, P., & Walton, Z. (2012). The consequences of predicting scientific impact in psychology using journal impact factors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 72–78.Google Scholar
Hendricks, J., Applebaum, R., & Kunkel, S. (2010). A world apart? Bridging the gap between theory and applied social gerontology. The Gerontologist, 50, 284–93.Google Scholar
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 102, 16569–16572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In Lynch, M. & Woolgar, S. (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lenoir, T. (1998). Inscribing science: Scientific texts and the materiality of communication. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lodahl, J. B., & Gordon, G. (1972). The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university departments. American Sociological Review, 37, 57–72.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, A. (2004). Gerontology coming of age: The transformation of social gerontology into a distinct academic discipline. Educational Gerontology, 30, 129–141.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. (1985). Discipline and the material form of images: An analysis of scientific visibility. Social Studies of Science, 15, 37–66.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. (1990). The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences. In Lynch, M. & Woolgar, S. (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 153–186). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Metchnikoff, É. (1903). The nature of man: Studies in optimistic philosophy. New York, NY: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Mercer, L., & Carter, L. (2012). Early journals and their influences on the development of Gerontology. Educational Gerontology, 38, 616–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D., Estabrooks, C., Norton, P., Cummings, G., Birdsell, J., Squires, J., & Hutchinson, A. (2009). Translating research in elder care: An introduction to a study protocol series. Implementation Science, 4, 1–8.Google Scholar
Myers, G. (1988). Every picture tells a story: Illustrations in E. O. Wilson’s Sociobiology. Human Studies, 11, 235–269.Google Scholar
Nascher, I. L. (1909). Geriatrics. New York Medical Journal, 90, 358–359.Google Scholar
SCImago. (2007). SJR – SCImago Journal and Country Rank. Retrieved from http://www.scimagojr.com Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Psychology’s status as a scientific discipline: Its empirical placement within an implicit hierarchy of the sciences. Review of General Psychology, 8, 59–67.Google Scholar
Smith, L. D., Best, L. A., Cylke, V. A., & Stubbs, D. A. (2000). Psychology without p values: Data analysis at the turn of the century. American Psychologist, 55, 260–263.Google Scholar
Smith, L. D., Best, L. A., Stubbs, D. A., Bastiani Archibald, A., & Robertson-Nay, R. (2002). Constructing knowledge: The role of graphs and tables in hard and soft psychology. American Psychologist, 57, 749–761.Google Scholar
Smith, L. D., Best, L. A., Stubbs, D. A., Johnston, J., & Bastiani Archibald, A. (2000). Scientific graphs and the hierarchy of the sciences: A Latourian survey of inscription practices. Social Studies of Science, 30, 73–94.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (2nd ed.). Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
Tukey, J. W. (1990). Data-based graphics: visual display in the decades to come. Statistical Science, 5(3), 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainer, H. (2013). Medical illuminations: Using evidence, visualization and statistical thinking to improve healthcare. Oxford, ENG: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L., & The Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604.Google Scholar
Yamashita, T., Bailer, A. J., & Kunkel, S. R. (2012). A descriptive review of graphics in the gerontologist published in the first 10 years of 21st century: Recent practice, suggested guideline and future direction. Unpublished manuscript. Oxford, OH: Scripps Gerontology Center, Miami University.Google Scholar