Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:52:21.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Goals and Personal Resources that Contribute to the Development and Agency Attachment of Older Adult Volunteers*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2011

Alayna A. Gillespie ,
Benjamin H. Gottlieb  and
Scott B. Maitland
Alayna A. Gillespie
Affiliation:
University of Guelph
Benjamin H. Gottlieb*
Affiliation:
University of Guelph
Scott B. Maitland
Affiliation:
University of Guelph
*
†Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to / La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à: Benjamin H. Gottlieb, Ph.D. Psychology Department, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examined the volunteer service contribution of older adults (N = 100) to volunteer role development and agency attachment. Informed by a developmental regulation framework and socio-emotional selectivity theory, we tested a twofold hypothesis for the premise that greater role development and agency attachment would be experienced by (1) older adults who had multiple goals for volunteering, and (2) older adults who pursued these goals by making greater use of their social resources relative to their physical and cognitive resources. Both hypotheses were supported. Older adults who have numerous motives for volunteering, and who maximize the use of their social skills and prosocial attitudes, are more strongly attached to their host agency and experience higher levels of volunteer role development. Implications for the field of volunteerism are discussed.

Résumé

Nous avons examiné la contribution bénévolat (N = 100) pour développer le rôle bénévolat et l’attachement aux agences des personnes âgées. Informé par un cadre intégrant la réglementation du développement et la théorie de la selectivité socio-affective, nous avons testé une double hypothèse pour la prémisse que le développement de plus grand rôle et l’attachement à l’agence serait vécue par (1) les personnes âgées qui avaient des objectifs multiples pour le bénévolat, et (2) les personnes âgées qui ont poursuivi ces objectifs en faisant une plus grande utilisation de leurs ressources sociales par rapport à leur physique et leurs ressources cognitives. Les deux hypothèses ont été corroborées. Les personnes âgées qui ont des motifs nombreux pour le bénévolat, et qui maximisent l’utilisation de leurs compétences et de leurs comportements sociales, sont plus fortement attachées à leur organisme d’acceuil et atteindre des niveaux plus élevés de développement du rôle bénévole. Les implications pour le domaine du volontariat sont discutées.

Keywords

sélectionoptimisationsélectivité socio-affectiverégulation du développementbénévolatpersonnes âgéesselectionoptimizationsocio-emotional selectivitydevelopmental regulationvolunteeringolder adults
Type
Regular Articles / Articles réguliers
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 101 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Our sincere thanks to the managers of volunteers and the volunteer participants from Caledonia Senior Support Services, Community Care Durham, Orillia Helping Hands, Services to Assist Independent Living, Knollcrest Lodge, Town and Country Support Services, Victorian Order of Nurses Hamilton, and Community Care Peterborough for their participation in this research. We are also indebted to our community partner, the Ontario Community Support Association, for its generous collaboration in this study. Funding for this research was provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, grant 410-2005-0694.

References

Abraham, J.D., & Hansson, R.O. (1995). Successful aging at work: An applied study of selection, optimization, and compensation through impression management. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 50B, P94–P103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelmann, P.K. (1994). Multiple roles and psychological well-being in a national sample of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 49, S277–S285.Google Scholar
Baltes, P.B., & Baltes, M.B. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In Baltes, P.B., & Baltes, M.M. (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R.F. (1991). Meanings of life. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L.L., Isaacowitz, D.M., & Charles, S.T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chappell, N.L., & Prince, M.J. (1997). Reasons why Canadian seniors volunteer. Canadian Journal on Aging, 16, 336–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chawla, A. (2005). Retention versus turnover: Opposite side of the same coin? Comparing employees’ agency attachment to their turnover intentions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Clary, E., Snyder, M., Ridge, R., Copeland, J., Stukas, A., Haugen, J., et al. . (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1516–1530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple/regression correlation analysis for the behavioral scienced (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fisher, J., & Cole, K. (1993). Leadership and management of volunteer programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B.L., & Carstensen, L.L. (1990). Choosing social partners: How old age and anticipated endings make people more selective. Psychology and Aging, 5, 335–347.Google Scholar
Freund, A.M., & Baltes, P.B. (1998). Selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: Correlations with subjective indicators of successful aging. Psychology and Aging, 13, 531–543.Google Scholar
Freund, A.M., & Baltes, P.B. (2000). The orchestration of selection, optimization, and compensation: An action-theoretical conceptualization of a theory of developmental regulation. In Perrig, W.J., & Grob, A. (Eds.), Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness (pp. 35–58), Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Freund, A.M., Li, K.Z.H., & Baltes, P.B. (1999). Successful development and aging: The role of selection, optimization, and compensation. In Brandtstädter, J., & Lerner, R.M. (Eds.), Action and self-development: Theory and research through the lifespan (pp. 401–434). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Freund, A.M., & Riediger, M. (2002). Successful aging. In Lerner, R.M., Easterbrooks, A., & Mistry, J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Volume 6: Developmental Psychology (pp. 601–628). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gignac, M.A.M., Cott, C., & Badley, E.M. (2002). Adaptation to disability: Applying selective optimization with compensation to the behaviors of older adults with osteoarthritis. Psychology and Aging, 17, 520–524.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, B.H., & Shera, W. (2009). Findings of the Ontario provincial survey of managers of volunteers in the community support sector. Guelph, Ontario, Canada: Department of Psychology, University of Guelph.Google Scholar
Harris, A.H.S., & Thoresen, C.E. (2005). Volunteering is associated with delayed mortality in older people: Analysis of the Longitudinal Study of Aging. Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 739–752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lang, F.R., & Carstensen, L.L. (1994). Close emotional relationships in late life: Further support for proactive aging in the social domain. Psychology and Aging, 9, 315–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luoh, M.C., & Herzog, A.R. (2002). Individual consequences of volunteer and paid work in old age: Health and mortality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(4), 490–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millette, V., & Gagne, M. (2008) Designing volunteers’ tasks to maximize motivation, satisfaction and performance: The impact of job characteristics on volunteer engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musick, M.A., & Wilson, J. (2003). Volunteering and depression: The role of psychological and social resources in different age groups. Social Science & Medicine, 56(2), 259–269.Google Scholar
Okun, M.A., & Schultz, A. (2003). Age and motives for volunteering: Testing hypotheses derived from socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 18(2), 231–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oman, D., Thoresen, C.E., & McMahon, K. (1999). Volunteerism and mortality among the community-dwelling elderly. Journal of Health Psychology, 4(3), 301–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Omoto, A.M., Snyder, M., & Martino, S.C. (2000). Volunteerism and the life course: Investigating age-related agendas for action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22(3), 181–197.Google Scholar
Park, N., Park, M., & Peterson, C. (2010). When is the search for meaning related to life satisfaction? Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Riediger, M., & Freund, A.M. (2004). Interference and facilitation among personal goals: Differential associations with subjective well-being and persistent goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1511–1523.Google Scholar
Riediger, M., & Freund, A.M. (2006). Focusing and restricting: Two aspects of motivational selectivity in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 21, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riediger, M., Freund, A., & Baltes, P. (2005). Managing life through personal goals: Intergoal facilitation and intensity of goal pursuit in younger and older adulthood. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(2), 84–91.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. (2009). Highlights from the 2007 Canada survey of giving, volunteering, and participating. (Statistics Canada, Publication No. 71-542-XIE). Ottawa, ON: Minister of Industry.Google Scholar
Steger, M.F., Oishi, S., & Kashdan, T.B. (2009). Meaning in life across the life span: Levels and correlates of meaning in life from emerging adulthood to older adulthood. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(1), 43–52.Google Scholar
Thoits, P.A., & Hewitt, L.N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 115–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ware, J., Snow, K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Inc.Google Scholar
Wheeler, J.A., Gorey, K.M., & Greenblatt, B. (1998). The beneficial effects of volunteering for older volunteers and the people they serve: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 47(1), 69–79.Google Scholar