Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:43:08.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Étude de fiabilité de la version française du MFAQ (santé physique)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Richard Lefrançois ,
Gilbert Leclerc  and
Norman Poulin
Richard Lefrançois
Affiliation:
Université de Sherbrooke
Gilbert Leclerc
Affiliation:
Université de Sherbrooke
Norman Poulin
Affiliation:
Université de Sherbrooke
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to estimate the reliability of the French version of the M.F.A.Q. method, a tool used to measure the physical health of the elderly. During the survey, four interviewers assessed 15 subjects each by using the M.F.A.Q. Following this, all 60 participants were evaluated two months later, this time without the subjects being present. In addition, a geriatric specialist also assessed the 60 questionnaires a posteriori. The results show an intra-rater reliability (a 96% performance rate within a 1-point difference on a scale of 6) and an inter-rater reliability (Kappas, on a scale from good to moderate; alpha of Cronbach = 0.93) which were acceptable. An analysis of the covariance reveals that age does not figure in the judgments. The authors express certain reservations, but conclude that this instrument of measurement is flexible, easy to administer, in addition to its metrological properties being satisfactory.

Keywords

FiabilitéMFAQfiabilité intra-jugefiabilité inter-jugessanté physiqueReliabilityMFAQIntra-rater ReliabilityInter-rater ReliabilityHealth
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , Automne/Fall 1995 , pp. 525 - 535
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

Balamuth, E. (1965). Health interview responses compared with medical records. National Center for Health Statistics. Series 2, no 7. Washington: U.S. Department of Health, Education, & Welfare.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. (1971). Les usages sociaux du corps. Annales, janv-fév, 305–334.Google Scholar
Bureau de la statistique du Québec. (1986). Lespersonnes âgées au Québec. Québec: Les publications du Québec.Google Scholar
Busse, E.W. (1966). Social factors in influencing care and health of the elderly. McKinney, Dans J.C. & De Vyver, F.T. (Éds.), Aging and social policy. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1969). Weighted Kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213–2120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corin, E. (1987). Les dimensions sociales et psychiques de la santé: outils méthodologiques et perspectives d'analyse, no. 10. Québec: Commission d'enquête sur les services de santé et les services sociaux.Google Scholar
Cribier, F. (1979). Estimation de l'état de santé et pratiques médicales: une enquête auprès des nouveaux retraités parisiens. Gérontologie, 29, 12–20.Google Scholar
Cyr, M., Toupin, J., & Lesage, A. (1992). L'évaluation des problèmes psychosociaux chez des personnes ayant des problèmes psychiatriques graves. Rapport final, CQRS.Google Scholar
Duke University, Centre for the study of aging and human development. (1978). Multidimensional functional assessment: The OARS methodology (2e. éd.). Durham, NC: Duke University.Google Scholar
Fermanian, J. (1984). Mesure de l'accord entre deux juges. Cas qualitatif. Revue d'épidémiologie et de santé publique, 32, 140–147.Google Scholar
Fillenbaum, G.G., & Smyer, M.A. (1981). The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire. Journal of Gerontology, 36(4), 428–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, L.K., & Fillenbaum, G.G. (1985). OARS methodology, a decade of experience in geriatric assessment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 33(9), 607–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurland, B., Kurianski, J., Sharpe, L., Simon, R., Stiller, P., & Birkett, P. (1977). The comprehensive assessment and referral evaluation (CARE): Rationale, development and reliability. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 8, 9–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huck, S.W., Cormier, W.H., & Bounds, W.G. (1974). Reading statistics and research. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Leclerc, G., Lefrançois, R., & Poulin, N. (1992). Vieillissement actualisé et santé. Graspa. Sherbrooke: Université de Sherbrooke.Google Scholar
Lefrançois, R., Leclerc, G., & Poulin, N. (1992). Santé subjective et santé objective des personnes âgées: étude de fidélité du MFAQ. Létourneau, Dans G., Aider ses parents vieillissants: un défi personnel, familial, politique, communautaire. Outremont: AQG.Google Scholar
Morris, J.N., Sherwood, S., & Mor, V. (1984). An assessment tool for use in identifying functionnally vulnerable persons in the community. The Gerontologist, 24(4), 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, W.W., & Boutelle, S. (1985). Multidimensional functional assessment in two modes. The Gerontologist, 25(6), 638–644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, F.L., & Rinkus, A.J. (1978). Level of functioning, clinical judgment, and mental health service evaluation. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1, 175–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfeiffer, E. (1975). OARS Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. (1986). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Vallerand, R.J. (1990). Validation trans-culturelle d'instruments psychologiques: procédures et méthodologies. Communication présentée à l'unité de recherche psychosociale de l'Hôpital Douglas, le 8 mai 1990.Google Scholar