Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:58:34.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Éditorial: De retour à Bismarck? Les conséquences d'une plus grande longévité sur les politiques gouvernementales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial/Éditorial
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , Fall/Automne 2002 , pp. 331 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2002

References

Barr, N. (2001). The welfare state as piggy bank: Information, risk, uncertainty and the role of the state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtless, G., & Quinn, J. (2001). Retirement trends and policies to encourage work among older Americans. In Budetti, P., Burkhauser, R., Gregory, J., & Hunt, H. A. (Eds.), Ensuring health and income security for an aging workforce (pp. 375–416). Kalamazoo Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, P., & Hausman, J. (1984). Individual retirement and savings behavior. Journal of Public Economics, 23, 81–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, C., & Gratton, B. (1994). Old age and the search for security: An American social history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heisz, A., Jackson, A., & Picot, G. (2001). Distributional outcomes in Canada. In Banting, K., Sharpe, A., & St-Hilaire, F., (Eds.). The longest decade: Canada in the 1990s (pp. 247–272). Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
Hicks, P. (2001). Public support for retirement income reform. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Trouvé le 13 août, 2002, sur le Site Web de L'OCDE http://www.oecd.orgCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morissette, R., Zhang, X., & Drolet, M. (2002). The evolution of wealth inequality in Canada, 1984–1999 (Analytical Studies Branch, Research Paper No. 187). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Myles, J. (2000). The maturation of Canada's retirement income system: Income levels, income inequality and low income among older persons. Canadian Journal on Aging, 19, 287–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myles, J. (in press). A new social contract for the elderly? In Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A., & Myles, J. (Eds.). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Myles, J., & Pierson, P. (2001). The comparative political economy of pension reform. In Pierson, P. (Ed.). the new politics of the welfare state (pp. 305–333). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1996). Caring for frail elderly people. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2001). Aging and income: Financial resources and retirement in 9 OECD countries. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
Pransky, G. (2001). Living longer but able to work? In Budetti, P., Burkhauser, R., Gregory, J., & Hunt, H. A. (Eds.). Ensuring health and income support for an aging workforce (pp. 431–438). Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute.Google Scholar
Scherer, P. (2002). Age of withdrawal from the labour force in OECD countries. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Trouvé le 13 août, 2002, sur le Site Web de L'OCDE http://www.oecd.orgGoogle Scholar
Thompson, L. (1998). Older and wiser: The economics of public pensions. Washington: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Wolf, D. (1999). The family as provider of long-term care: efficiency, equity and externalities. Journal of Aging and Health, 11, 360–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed