Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:08:59.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chronic Health Conditions: Changing Prevalence in an Aging Population and Some Implications for the Delivery of Health Care Services*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2010

Frank T. Denton  and
Byron G. Spencer
Frank T. Denton*
Affiliation:
McMaster University
Byron G. Spencer*
Affiliation:
McMaster University
*
†Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to / La correspondance concernant cet article doit être adressées à: Frank T. Denton and Byron G. Spencer, McMaster University, Department of Economics, KTH-426, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4M4. ([email protected]; [email protected])
†Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to / La correspondance concernant cet article doit être adressées à: Frank T. Denton and Byron G. Spencer, McMaster University, Department of Economics, KTH-426, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4M4. ([email protected]; [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the prevalence of many chronic health conditions increases with age, we might anticipate that as the population ages the proportion with one or more such conditions, and the cost of treatment, would rise. How much would the overall prevalence of chronic conditions increase in a quarter century if age-specific rates of prevalence did not change? How much would the requirements for health care resources increase? How much difference would it make to those requirements if people had fewer chronic conditions? The overall prevalence rates for almost all conditions associated mostly with old age would rise by more than 25 per cent, and health care requirements would grow more rapidly than the population – more than twice as rapidly in the case of hospital stays – if the rates for each age group remained constant. Even modest reductions in the average number of conditions at each age could result in substantial savings.

Résumé

Parce que la prévalence de nombreuses conditions de santé chroniques augmente avec l’âge, nous pourrions anticiper que la proportion montrant une ou plusieurs de ces conditions, ainsi que les frais de traitement, augmenterait comme le vieillissement de la population. Combien la prévalence globale des affections chroniques augmenteraient en un quart de siècle si l’âge spécifiques des taux de prévalence n’ont pas changé? Les taux de prévalence globaux pour presque toutes les conditions qui découlent principalement de la vieillesse augmenteraient de plus de 25 pour cent, et les exigences en matière de santé auraient cru plus rapidement que la population – plus de deux fois plus rapidement dans le cas des séjours hospitaliers – si les taux pour chaque groupe d’âge sont restés constants. Combien serait requise pour l’augmentation des ressources de santé? Quelle différence rendrait-il à ces exigences si les gens avaient moins de maladies chroniques? Même de réductions modestes dans le nombre moyen de conditions à chaque âge pourraient entraîner des économies importantes.

Keywords

affections chroniquespopulation vieillissanteressources de santéchronic conditionsaging populationhealth care resources
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 29 , Issue 1: Special Issue from the Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Project (SEDAP) – Caring for an Aging Population: Context, Practice & Policy , March 2010 , pp. 11 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article was carried out as part of the SEDAP (Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population) Research Program. SEDAP is supported by a Major Collaborative Research Initiatives grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. We are grateful for that support. The authors thank Christine Feaver for her assistance and two anonymous referees for helpful comments.

References

Broemeling, A.-M., Watson, D.E., & Prebtani, F. (2008). Population patterns of chronic health conditions, co-morbidity and healthcare use in Canada: Implications for policy and practice. Healthcare Quarterly, 11(3), 70–76. http://www.longwoods.com/product.php?productid=19859&cat=550. Accessed 11 January 2010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denton, F.T., Feaver, C.H., & Spencer, B.G. (1994). Economic-demographic projection and simulation: A description of the MEDS system of models. In Vaninadha Rao, K. and Wicks, Jerry W. (Eds.), Studies in applied demography: Proceedings of the international conference on applied demography (pp. 3–12). Bowling Green, Ohio: Bowling Green University.Google Scholar
Denton, F.T., Feaver, C.H., & Spencer, B.G. (2005). MEDS-D user’s manual. Research Report No. 400, Research Institute for Quantitative Studies in Economics and Population. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: McMaster University.Google Scholar
Denton, F.T., Gafni, A., & Spencer, B.G. (2001). Population change and the requirements for physicians: The case of Ontario. Canadian Public Policy, 27, 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, F.T., Gafni, A., & Spencer, B.G. (2002). Exploring the effects of population change on the costs of physician services. Journal of Health Economics, 21, 781–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denton, F.T., Gafni, A., & Spencer, B.G. (2003). Requirements for physicians in 2030: Why population aging matters less than you may think. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 168, 1545–1547.Google ScholarPubMed
Dorland, J., & McColl, M.A. (Eds.). (2007). Emerging approaches to chronic disease management in primary health care. Kingston, Ontario: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Epping-Jordan, J.E., Pruitt, S.D., Bengoa, R., & Wagner, E.H. (2004). Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 13, 299–305. http://qshc.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/13/4/299. Accessed 11 January 2010.Google Scholar
Gilmour, H., & Park, J. (2005). Dependency, chronic conditions and pain in seniors. Supplement to Health Reports, 16, 21–31. Statistics Canada, Catalogue 82-003.Google Scholar
Kane, R.L., Priester, R., & Totten, A.M. (2005). Meeting the challenge of chronic illness. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langa, K.M., Larson, E.B., Karlawish, J.H., Cutler, D.M., Kabeto, M.U., Kim, S.Y., et al. . (2008). Trends in the prevalence and mortality of cognitive impairment in the United States: Is there evidence of a compression of cognitive morbidity? Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 4, 134–144.Google Scholar
Légaré, J., & Décarie, Y. (2008). Using Statistics Canada LifePaths Microsimulation Model to project the health status of Canadian elderly. SEDAP Research Paper No. 227. Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster University.Google Scholar
Manton, K.G., & Gu, X. (2001). Changes in the prevalence of chronic disability in the United States black and nonblack population over age 65 from 1982 to 1999. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 6354–6359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manton, K.G., Gu, X., & Ukraintseva, S.V. (2005). Declining prevalence of dementia in the US elderly population. Advances in Gerontology, 16, 30–37.Google ScholarPubMed
O’Halloran, J., Miller, G.C., & Britt, H. (2004). Defining chronic conditions for primary care with ICPC-2. Family Practice, 21, 381–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Neill, G., & Barry, P.P. (2003). Training physicians in geriatric care: Responding to critical need. Public Policy and Aging Report, 13(2) (spring), 17–21. http://www.agingsociety.org/agingsociety/pdf/trainging.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2010.Google Scholar
van der Lee, J.H., Mokkink, L.B., Grootenhuis, M.A., Heymans, H.S., & Offringa, M. (2007). Definition and measurement of chronic health conditions in childhood: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 297, 24, June 27, 2741–2751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. (n.d.). The impact of chronic disease in Canada. Facing the Facts. http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/media/canada.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2010.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2002) Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions, Executive Summary Geneva, WHOGoogle Scholar