No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Bryan S. Green. Gerontology and the Construction of Old Age: A Study in Discourse Analysis. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1993, pp. 226. $49.95 cloth.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 November 2010
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Reviews/Comptes rendus
- Information
- Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 14 , Issue 1: Models of Aging , Printemps/Spring 1995 , pp. 140 - 143
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1995
References
Barthes, R.L. (1981). Theory of the text. In Young, R. (Ed.), Untying the text: A post structural reader. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday.Google Scholar
Carroll, J.B. (Ed.). (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kenyon, G.M., Birren, J.E., & Schroots, J.J.F. (Eds.). (1991). Metaphors of aging in science and the humanities. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nuessel, F. (1994). Metaphorical constructs, aging, and health care delivery. Signifying Behaviors, 1(1), 201–213.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press.Google Scholar
Riffaterre, M. (1984). Intertextual representation: on mimesis as interpretive discourse. Critical Inquiry, 11, 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E. (1931). Abstract of “Conceptual strategies in primitive languages”. Paper presented to the National Academy of Sciences. Science, 74, 578.Google Scholar