Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:09:17.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stake in Farm and Family: A Two Generation Perspective*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Brenda Munro ,
Norah Keating  and
Xiumei Zhang
Brenda Munro
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Norah Keating
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Xiumei Zhang
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Résumé:

La plupart des recherches sur les relations entre générations au sein de families âgées ont principalement porté sur les parents frêles et leurs enfants d'êge adulte. Cette étude a pour but d'examiner les engagements entre générations et les liens entre les parents et leurs enfants qui géraient communément une ferme. Le point de mire théorique de l'étude était les intérêts de chacune des générations. Nous prédisions que les enjeux autour des intérêts devaient être cruciaux en raison de l'interdépendance des générations et du patrimoine familial à maintenir. Une échelle d'intérêts familiaux et agricoles a été élaborée, et les niveaux d'intérêt de ces deux secteurs ont été examinés en fonction de la génération et du sexe. Les différences entre générations, moins importantes que prédites, sont dues au rôle des belles-filles, lesquelles habitaient à l'extérieur de la maison de ferme.

Keywords

Generational RelationshipsDevelopmental StakeCommitmentFarm FamliesRelations entre générationsenjeux de développementengagementfamilies vivant sur une ferme
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , Automne/Fall 1995 , pp. 564 - 579
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bengtson, V.L., & Cutler, N.E. (1976). Generations and intergenerational relations: Perspectives on age groups and social change. In Binstock, R.H. & Shanas, E. (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 130–159). Now York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.Google Scholar
Bengtson, V.L., & Kuypers, J.A. (1971). Generational differences and the developmental stake. Aging and Human Development, 2(4), 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, J.B., & Harvey, C.D.H. (1991). Ethnicity and intergenerational perceptions of family solidarity. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 33(1), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, J.E., & Dillman, D.A. (1983). Influence of kinship arrangements on farmer innovativeness. Rural Sociology, 48(2), 183–200.Google Scholar
Davis, P. (1983). Realizing the potential of the family business. Organizational Dynamics, Summer, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, E. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. Psychological Issues, 1(1), 23–32.Google Scholar
Finley, N.L., Roberts, M.D., & Banahan, B.F. (1988). Motivators and inhibitors of attitudes of filial obligation toward aging parents. The Gerontologist, 28(1), 73–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gasson, R., Crow, G., Errington, A., Hutson, J., Marsden, P., & Winter, D.M. (1988). The farm as a family business: A review. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 39(1), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, J., Bengtson, V.L., & Dunham, C.C. (1986). Attitude similarity in three-generation families: Socialization, status inheritance, or reciprocal influence? American Sociological Review, 51, 685–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagestad, G.O. (1981). Problems and promises in the social psychology of intergenerational relations. In Fogel, R.W., Hatfield, E., Kiesler, S.B. & Shanas, E. (Eds.), Aging: Stability and change in the family (pp. 11–46). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hutson, J. (1987). Fathers and sons: Family farms, family businesses and the farming industry. Sociology, 21(2), 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, N.C., & Little, H.M. (1991). Generations in farm families: Transfer of the family farm in New Zealand. (Research Report No. 209). Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Keating, N.C., & Munro, B. (1988). Farm women/farm work. Sex Roles, 19(3/4), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, N.C., & Munro, B. (1989). Transferring the family farm: Process and implications. Family Relations, 38, 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, N.C., & Munro, B. (1991). Generations in Alberta farming families. Final report submitted to the Alberta Senior Citizens' Secretariat and Alberta Agriculture.Google Scholar
Knipscheer, K. (1984). The quality of the relationship between elderly people and their adult children. In Garms-Homolava, V., Hoerning, E.M. & Schaeffer, E. (Eds.), Intergenerational relationships (pp. 91–97). Lewiston, NY: C.J., Hogrefe, Inc.Google Scholar
Knipscheer, K., & Bevers, A. (1985). Older parents and their middle-aged children: Symmetry or asymmetry in their relationship. Canadian Journal on Aging, 4(3), 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, S.B. (1976). Working together: Women and family in south-western Saskatchewan. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston of Canada Limited.Google Scholar
Larzelere, R.E., & Klein, D.M. (1987). Methodology. In Sussman, M.B. & Steinmetz, S.K. (Eds.), Handbook of Marriage and the Family (pp. 125–150). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, M. (1985). The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting continuity of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, J.A., & Blieszner, R. (1989). Aging parents and adult children: Research themes in intergenerational relations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marotz-Baden, R., & Cowan, D. (1987). Mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law: The effects of proximity on conflict and stress. Family Relations, 36, 385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, N.E., & Abramowitz, S.I. (1982). Beyond deficit-filling and developmental stakes: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on parental heritage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, B. (1986). Women as farm labour. Rural Sociology, 51(2), 143–155.Google Scholar
Richards, L., Bengtson, V., & Miller, R.B. (1989). The generation in the middle: Perceptions of adults' intergenerational relationships. In Kreppner, K. & Lerner, R.M. (Eds.), Family systems and lifespan development (pp. 341–366). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Roberts, R.E.L., Richards, L.N., & Bengtson, V.L. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in families: Untangling the ties that bind. Family and Marriage Review, 16, 11–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblatt, P.C., & Anderson, R.M. (1981). Interaction in farm families: Tension and stress. In Coward, R.T. & Smith, W.M. Jr, (Eds.), The family in rural society (pp. 147–166). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, R.A. (1986). U.S. farm women: Their part in farm work and decision making. Work and Occupations, 13(2), 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, A.S., & Rossi, P.H. (1990). Of human bonding: parent-child relationships across the life course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stanley, S.M., & Markman, H.J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, L., Clark, K., & Gunn, W. (1985). Developmental stage and perceptions of intergenerational continuity. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 913–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A. (1991). The relationship between family and the state in the care of older people. Canadian Journal on Aging, 10(2), 94–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A.J., Shin, H., & Bird, D.N. (1990). Perceptions of relationship changes and caregiver satisfaction. Family Relations, 39, 147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, W.W., & Hill, R. (1951). The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Weigel, R.R., Weigel, D.J., & Blundall, J. (1987). Stress, coping, and satisfaction: Generational differences in farm families. Family Relations, 36, 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar