Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:00:30.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sex of Target and Sex of Subject Effects on the Perception of 25, 45, 65, and 85 Year Olds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

William L. Gekoski ,
V. Jane Knox ,
Edward A. Johnson  and
Kenneth R. Evans
William L. Gekoski
Affiliation:
Queen's University
V. Jane Knox
Affiliation:
Queen's University
Edward A. Johnson
Affiliation:
Queen's University
Kenneth R. Evans
Affiliation:
Queen's University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a completely between subjects design 80 male and 80 female undergraduates evaluated targets which were male or female and 25, 45, 65, or 85 years old, on the Aging Semantic Differential (ASD; Rosencranz & McNevin, 1969). Findings indicated that older targets were rated less positively than younger targets on two of the three ASD dimensions and that Target Age × Target Sex × Subject Age interactions were significant for two of the dimensions. These results replicate the target age (between subjects) effects reported by O'Connell and Rotter (1979) but not those which involved target sex (within subjects) and subject sex. It was concluded that a) subject sex and target sex affect perceptions of targets of different ages elicited from young subjects and b) between subjects versus within subjects designs produce different characterizations of such targets.

Résumé

Au cours d'une recherche conçue sur un modèle strictement intersubjectif, 80 étudiants et 80 étudiantes du premier cycle ont porté une appréciation sur des hommes et des femmes (cibles) âgés de 25, 45, 65 et 85 ans, à l'aide de la différentielle sémantique sur le vieillissement (Rosencranz & McNevin, 1969: Aging Sematic Differential/ASD/). Les résultats indiquent que les cibles plus âgées ont été moins bien cotées que les plus jeunes selon deux des trois dimensions de l'ASD, et que les interactions “Âge de la cible × Sexe de la cible × Âge du sujet” sont significatives pour deux des dimensions. Ces résultats confirment les effets de l'âge des cibles (entre sujets) rapportés par O'Connell et Rotter (1979), mais non pas ceux qui proviennent du sexe des cibles (entre sujets) ni du sexe des sujets. On en conclut (a) que le sexe du sujet et celui de la cible affectent la perception des cibles d'âge différent, chez les sujets jeunes et (b) que le plan de recherche intersubjectif évoque des caractérisations différentes de celles que l'on obtient à partir d'un plan de recherche basé sur la réciprocité.

Keywords

Attitudes and agingStereotypes and agingSex differencesExperimental design differences.Attitudes et vieillissementstéréotypes et vieillissementdifférences entre les sexesdifference entre les plans de recherche.
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 1984 , pp. 155 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amir, Y. (1969). Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 319–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amir, Y. (1976). The role of intergroup contact in change of prejudice and ethnic relations. In Katz, P.A. (Ed.), Towards the Elimination of Racism. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Baker, P. M. (1983). Ageism, sex, and age: A factorial survey approach. Canadian Journal of Aging, 2, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broverman, I. K., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., Rosenkrantz, P. S., & Vogel, S. R. (1970). Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgements of mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, D., Clore, G. L., & Worchel, P. (1966). Effect of similarity-dissimilarity on interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, D., Griffitt, W., & Stefaniak, D. (1967). Attraction and similarity of personality characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 82–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drevenstedt, J. (1981). Age bias in the evaluation of achievement: What determines? Journal of Gerontology, 36, 453–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drevenstedt, J., & Banziger, G. (1977). Attitudes toward the elderly and toward the mentally ill. Psychological Reports, 41, 347–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisdorfer, C. & Altrocchi, J. (1961). A comparison of attitudes toward old age and mental illness. Journal of Gerontology, 16, 340–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gekoski, W. L., Knox, V. J., Majid, S., & Kelly, L. (1984). Evaluativeness ratings of 192 adjectives comprising 96 biopolar adjective pairs frequently used in assessing perceptions of individuals of different ages (Tech. Rep. No. 1). Kingston, Ontario: Queen's University, Department of Psychology, Aging Research Project.Google Scholar
Hull, C. H., & Nie, N. (1981). SPSS Update 7–9: New procedures and facilities for releases 7–9. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Ivester, C. & King, K. (1977). Attitudes of adolescents toward the aged. The Gerontologist, 17, 85–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly-Doornekamp, L., Knox, V. J., & Gekoski, W. L. (1982, November). Stereotypes of ‘ideal’ and ‘typical’ old and middle-aged stimulus persons as related to age of subject. Paper presented at the meetings of the Gerontological Society of America, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
Kidwell, I. J., & Booth, A. (1977). Social distance and intergenerational relations. The Gerontologist, 5, 412–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilty, K. M. & Feld, A. (1976). Attitudes toward aging and toward the needs of older people. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 586–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, B. W., & Moss, A. J. (1963). A comparison of direct and attributed attitudes of younger and older age groups. The Gerontologist, 3, 30.Google Scholar
Kogan, N. (1979a). A study of age categorization. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 355–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kogan, N. (1979b). Beliefs, attitudes and stereotypes about old people: A new look at some old issues. Research on Aging, 1, 11–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, N., & Mills, M. (1983, November). Is age a more salient dimension for males than for females? Paper presented at the meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, San Francisco, Cal.Google Scholar
Levine, R., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Attitudes, and Group Behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lutsky, N. S. (1980). Attitudes toward old age and elderly persons. In Eisdorfer, C., Besdine, R. W., Birren, J. E., Cristofalo, V., Lawton, M. P., Maddox, G. L., & Starr, B. D. (Eds.), Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics (Vol. 1). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Neugarten, B. L. (1975). The future and the young-old. The Gerontologist, 15, 4–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newfield, K. P. (1971). Orientation to later maturity: The wishes and expectations of employed men for their post-65 years. The Gerontologist, 11, 50.Google Scholar
O'Connell, A. N., & Rotter, N. G. (1979). The influence of stimulus age and sex on person perception. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 220–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, J. S., & Slemp, S. R. (1980). Differences among three adult age groups in their attitudes toward self and others. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 136, 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosencranz, H. A., & McNevin, T. E. (1969). A factor analysis of attitudes toward the aged. The Gerontologist, 9, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schonfield, D. (1982). Who is stereotyping whom and why? The Gerontologist, 22, 267–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverman, M., & Townsend, J. C. (1977). Effects of implied attitude similarity on stereotype of aging: A pilot study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unger, R. K. (1979). Female and male: Psychological perspectives. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Weinberger, L. E., & Millham, J. (1975). A multidimensional, multiple method analysis of attitudes toward the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 343–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zajonc, R. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar