Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:59:20.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seniors Falls Investigative Methodology (SFIM): A Systems Approach to the Study of Falls in Seniors*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

Aleksandra A. Zecevic ,
Alan W. Salmoni ,
John H. Lewko  and
Anthony A. Vandervoort
Aleksandra A. Zecevic*
Affiliation:
School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario
Alan W. Salmoni
Affiliation:
School of Kinesiology, University of Western Ontario
John H. Lewko
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Human Development, Laurentian University
Anthony A. Vandervoort
Affiliation:
School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario
*
Requests for offprints should be sent to:/Les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à : Aleksandra A. Zecevic, Ph.D., School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, Elborn College, London, ON N6G 1H1. ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An in-depth understanding of human factors and human error is lacking in current research on seniors' falls. Additional knowledge is needed to understand why seniors are falling. The purpose of this article is to describe the adapting of the Integrated Safety Investigation Methodology (ISIM) (used for investigating transportation and industrial accidents) to studying seniors' falls. An adapted version—the Seniors Falls Investigative Methodology (SFIM)—uses a systems approach to take an investigation beyond the immediate cause of an incident and reveal unsafe acts and deeply imbedded unsafe conditions that contribute to adverse outcomes. An example case study is used to describe six phases of the investigative process in detail. The SFIM has the potential to identify safety deficiencies; utilize existing knowledge about falls; establish a standardized reporting system; shift focus from the faller to the system; and guide targeted prevention.

Résumé

La recherche actuelle portant sur les chutes chez les aînés manque d'analyse approfondie sur des questions telles les facteurs humains et l'erreur humaine. Un savoir plus élargi est nécessaire afin de comprendre pourquoi les personnes âgées sont exposées à des chutes. Le but de cette étude est d'illustrer la possibilité d'adapter la Méthodologie intégrée d'enquête sur la sécurité (MIES), utilisée dans l'investigation des accidents dans les domaines de l'industrie et des transports, à l'étude des chutes chez les aînés. La version adaptée de cette méthodologie — Méthodologie d'enquête sur les chutes chez les aînés (MECA) utilise une approche systémique afin de mener l'investigation au-delà des causes immédiates d'un incident, pour révéler les conditions et les actions dangereuses qui contribuent à des résultats cliniques défavorables. Une étude de cas est utilisée comme exemple pour décrire de manière détaillée les six phases du processus d'investigation. La MECA offre la possibilité de: identifier les manquements à la sécurité; utiliser les connaissances actuelles en matière de chutes; établir et standardiser un système d'échange de données; focaliser la perspective sur le système et non pas sur la victime des chutes à répétition; guider le processus de prévention ciblée.

Keywords

agingfalls in seniorshuman factorssystems approachinvestigation methodhuman errorpreventionvieillissementchutes chez les aînésfacteurs humainsapproche systémiqueméthode d'investigationerreur humaineprévention
Type
Policy and Practice Note/Note sur les lignes directrices et la pratique
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , Fall/Automne 2007 , pp. 281 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The first and second authors would like to acknowledge grant support from the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation.

References

American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society & American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention (2001). Guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49, 664–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayeko, M. (2002). Integrated safety investigation methodology (ISIM): Investigating for risk mitigation. Paper presented to the Workshop on the Investigation and Reporting of Incidents and Accidents, 17–20 July, University of Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar
Berg, W.P., Alessio, H.M., Mills, E.M., & Tong, C. (1997). Circumstances and consequences of falls in independent community-dwelling older adults. Age and Ageing, 26, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchner, D.M., Hornbrook, M.C., Kutner, N.G., Tinetti, M.E., Ory, M.G., Mulrow, C.D., et al. (1993). Development of the common database for the FICSIT trials. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 41, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Close, J.C. (2005). Prevention of falls: A time to translate evidence into practice. Age and Ageing, 34, 98–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekker, S.W.A. (2002a). The field guide to human error investigations. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dekker, S.W.A. (2002b). Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: The new view on error and performance. Journal of Safety Research, 33, 371–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, E. (1972). Men and machine: Systems for safety. In Proceedings of British Airline Pilots Association Technical Symposium (pp. 21–36). London, UK: British Airline Pilots Association.Google Scholar
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini-Mental State”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, T., Taylor, A.W., & Pengelly, A. (2005). A population-based survey of factors relating to the prevalence of falls in older people. Gerontology, 51, 340–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, L.D., Gillespie, W.J., Robertson, M.C., Lamb, S.E., Cumming, R.G., & Rowe, B.H. (2002). Interventions for Preventing Falls in Elderly People. (Cochrane Review; Cochrane Library, Iss. 1). Oxford: Update Software.Google Scholar
Hawkins, F.H. (1993). Human Factors in Flight. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Nottrodt, J., Hill, M., & McCullough, E. (1997). Investigating for human factors: An integrated approach. Paper presented to the 9th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
O'Hare, D. (2000). The “Wheel of Misfortune”: A taxonomic approach to human factors in accident investigation and analysis in aviation and other complex systems. Ergonomics, 43, 2001–2019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, B. (1982). Falls among the elderly living in high-rise apartments. Journal of Family Practice, 14, 1069–1073.Google ScholarPubMed
Public Health Agency of Canada (2005). Report on seniors' falls in Canada. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, J. (1987). Reasons, causes and human error. In Rasmussen, J., Duncan, K., & Leplat, J. (Eds.), New technology and human error (pp. 293–301). Toronto: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Reason, J. (1987). Generic Error-Modelling System (GEMS): A congnitive framework for locating common human error forms. In Rasmussen, J., Duncan, K., & Leplat, J. (Eds.), New technology and human error (pp. 63–83). Toronto: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reason, J. (1997). Managing the Risk of Organizational Accidents. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Reason, J. (2000). Human error: Models and management. British Medical Journal, 320, 768–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reason, J. (2004). Beyond the organizational accident: The need for “error wisdom” on the frontline. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(Suppl. 2)28–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reason, J. (2005). Safety in the operating theatre—Part 2: Human error and organisational failure. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14, 56–61.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, L.Z., & Josephson, K.R. (2002). The epidemiology of falls and syncope. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 18, 141–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salvà, A., Bolíbar, I., Pera, G., & Arias, C. (2004). Incidence and consequences of falls among elderly people living in the community. Medicina Clinica (Barcelona), 122, 172–176.Google ScholarPubMed
Shappell, S.A., & Wiegmann, D.A. (1997). A human error approach to accident investigation: The taxonomy of unsafe operations. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7, 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, F.E. (2002). Falls in cognitive impairment and dementia. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 18, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speechley, M., Belfry, S., Borrie, M.J., Bray Jenkyn, K., Crilly, R., Gill, D.P., et al. (2005). Risk factors for falling among community-dwelling veterans and their caregivers. Canadian Journal on Aging, 24, 261–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talbot, L.A., Musiol, R.J., Witham, E.K., & Metter, J.E. (2005). Falls in young, middle-aged, and older community-dwelling adults: Perceived cause, environmental factors, and injury. BMC Public Health, 5, 86–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tideiksaar, R. (2002). Falls in older people: Prevention and management. Baltimore, MD: Health Professions Press.Google Scholar
Tinetti, M.E., Baker, D.I., McAvay, G., Claus, E.B., Garrett, P., Gottschalk, M., et al. (1994). A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community. New England Journal of Medicine, 331, 821–827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinetti, M.E., Speechley, M., & Ginter, S.F. (1988). Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. New England Journal of Medicine, 319, 1701–1707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Transportation Safety Board of Canada (1998). An integrated process for investigating human factors. Hull, QC: Author.Google Scholar
Transportation Safety Board of Canada (2002). A guide to investigating for organizational and management factors. Hull, QC: Author.Google Scholar
Vincent, C., Taylor-Adams, S., Chapman, J.E., Hewett, D., Prior, S., Strange, P., et al. (2000). How to investigate and analyse clinical incidents: Clinical risk unit and association of litigation and risk management protocol. British Medical Journal, 320, 777–781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincent, C., Taylor-Adams, S., & Stanhope, N. (1998). Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. British Medical Journal, 316, 1154–1157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiegmann, D.A., & Shappell, S.A. (2003). A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Zecevic, A.A., Salmoni, A.W., Speechley, M., & Vandervoort, A.A. (2006). Defining a fall and reasons for falling: Comparisons among the views of seniors, health care providers, and the research literature. Gerontologist, 39, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar