Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T16:13:45.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Needs of Aging Parents Caring for an Adult with Acquired Brain Injury*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Patricia Minnes ,
Lynn Woodford ,
Peter Carlson ,
Jane Johnston  and
Mary Ann McColl
Patricia Minnes*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario
Lynn Woodford
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario
Peter Carlson
Affiliation:
Regional Community Brain Injury Services, Kingston, Ontario
Jane Johnston
Affiliation:
Regional Community Brain Injury Services, Kingston, Ontario
Mary Ann McColl
Affiliation:
Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario
*
†Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to / La correspondance concernant cet article doit être adressées à: Patricia Minnes, PhD Dept. of Psychology, Queen’s University Kingston Ontario Canada K7L 3N6 (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study focused on issues of concern to and service needs of older parents caring for an adult son or daughter with an acquired brain injury (ABI) in Ontario. Three issues were identified as particularly challenging: diagnosis of the brain injury, parents’ feelings about the cause of the brain injury, and planning for long-term accommodation for their family member with a brain injury. The most frequently cited services needed for the person with ABI were social and/or recreational activities, day programs, and residential placement. The most frequently cited services needed by parents were parent education and support groups. The information gathered provides a base for further research in other sectors. Implications of these initial findings for clinical practice and policy and program development are discussed.

Résumé

Cette étude a porté sur des questions d’intérêt pour et au service des besoins des parents plus âgés qui s’occupent d’un fils ou d’une fille adulte avec une lésion cérébrale acquise (LCA) en Ontario. Trois questions ont été identifiées comme particulièrement difficile: le diagnostic de la lésion cérébrale, les sentiments des parents quant à la cause des lésions cérébrales, et le planification d’hébergement à long terme pour leurs membres de familles avec une lésion cérébrale. Les services les plus fréquemment cités pour les besoins d’une personne atteinte de LCA étaient d’ordre social et/ou d’activités de loisirs, programmes de jour, et le placement residentiel. Les services les plus fréquemment cités comme nécessaires par les parents etaient l’éducation des parents et des groupes de soutien. L’information recueillie fournit une base pour d’autres recherches dans d’autres secteurs. Les implications de ces résultats initiaux pour la pratique et la politique clinique et pour le développement du programme sont discutées.

Keywords

vieillissementaidantsune lesion cerebrale (LCA)stresssoutienagingcaregiversacquired brain injuryABIstresssupport
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 185 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was funded by a grant from the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation. The authors greatly appreciate the considerable time and energy taken by the parents who shared their experiences with us and the agencies that made invaluable contributions to this project: Regional Community Brain Injury Services, Kingston; Pathways to Independence, Belleville; Hamilton Brain Injury Services, Brain Injury Community Re-entry Niagara, the Ontario and Ottawa Valley Brain Injury Associations, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Participation House, Waterloo. We also would like to thank our interviewers—M.L. Boudreau, S. Lawrence, L. Lloyd, L. MacDonald, S. Rogers, C. Jestin, P. Leblanc, K. McKechrin, A. Bird, P. Baine, and T. Van Dongen—and research assistants: Tanya Snicer, Jennifer Nachshen, and Kelly Benn.

References

Allen, K., Linn, R.T., Gutierrez, H., & Willer, B.S. (1994). Family burden following traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 39, 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschen, K., Gargaro, J., Gan, C., Gerber, G., & Brandys, C. (2007). Family interventions after acquired brain injury and other chronic conditions: A critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence. NeuroRehabilitation, 22, 19–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, N. (1991). The head-injured family. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 155–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleckman, A.D., & Brill, S. (1995). The impact of brain injury on family functioning: Implications for subacute rehabilitation programmes. Brain Injury, 9(4), 385–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, J.K.J., Godfrey, H.P.D., Partridge, F.M., & Knight, R.G. (2001). Caregiver depression following traumatic brain injury (TBI): A consequence of adverse effects on family members. Brain Injury, 15, 223–238.Google ScholarPubMed
Heller, T., & Factor, A. (1991). Permanency planning for adults with mental retardation living with family caregivers. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 163–176.Google ScholarPubMed
Junque, C., Bruna, O., & Mararo, M. (1997). Information needs of the traumatic brain injury patients’ family members regarding the consequences of the injury and associated perception of physical, cognitive, emotional and quality of life changes. Brain Injury, 11, 251–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, R.G., Devereux, R., & Godfrey, H.P.D. (1998). Caring for a family member with a traumatic injury. Brain Injury, 12, 467–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreutzer, J.S., Gervasio, A.H., & Camplair, P.S. (1994a). Primary caregivers’ psychological status and family functioning after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 8, 197–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreutzer, J.S., Serio, C.D., & Bergquist, S. (1994b). Family needs after brain injury: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 9, 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leith, K.H., Phillips, L., & Sample, P.L. (2004). Exploring the service needs and experiences of persons with TBI and their families: The South Carolina experience. Brain Injury, 18, 1191–1208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, N.V., Kersel, D.A., Havill, J.H., & Sleigh, J.W. (1998). Caregiver burden at 6 months following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 12, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMordie, W.R., Rogers, K.F., & Barker, S.L. (1991). Consumer satisfaction with services provided to head-injured patients and their families. Brain Injury, 5, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minnes, P.M., Graffi, S., Nolte, M.L., Carlson, P., & Harrick, L. (2000). Coping and stress in Canadian family caregivers of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Brain Injury, 14, 737–748.Google ScholarPubMed
Minnes, P.M., & Nachshen, J.S. (1997). The Family Stress and Support Questionnaire: Focusing on the needs of parents. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 5, 67–76.Google Scholar
Minnes, P.M., & Woodford, L.M. (2004). Well-being in older caregivers of adults with developmental disabilities. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 11, 47–66.Google Scholar
Nachshen, J., Woodford, L.M., & Minnes, P.M. (2003) The Family Stress and Coping Interview for families of children with developmental disabilities: A lifespan perspective on family adjustment. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 285–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NUD*IST. (1997). NUD*IST4 user guide. Melbourne, Australia: Qualitative Solutions and Research Pty. Ltd.Google Scholar
Perlesz, A., Kinsella, G., & Crowe, S. (1999). The impact of traumatic brain injury on the family: A critical review. Rehabilitation Psychology, 44, 6–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, L.C., Stambrook, M., Moore, A., & Esses, L. (1990). Psychosocial sequelae of closed head injury: Effects on the marital relationship. Brain injury, 4, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ponsford, J., Olver, J., Ponsford, M., & Nelms, R. (2003). Long-term adjustment of families following traumatic brain injury where comprehensive rehabilitation has been provided. Brain Injury, 17, 453–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sander, A.M., High, W.M., Hannay, H.J., & Sherer, M. (1997). Predictors of psychological health in caregivers of patients with closed head injury. Brain Injury, 11, 235–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sample, P.L., & Darragh, A.R. (1998). Perceptions of care access: The experience of rural and urban women following brain injury. Brain Injury, 12, 855–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seltzer, M.M., & Krauss, M.W. (1989). Aging parents with adult mentally retarded children: Family risks factors and sources of support. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 303–312.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, G.C., Tobin, S.S., & Fullmer, E.M. (1995). Elderly mothers caring at home for offspring with mental retardation: A model for permanency planning. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 99, 487–499.Google Scholar
Townsend, A., Noekler, L., Diemling, G., & Bass, D. (1989). Longitudinal impact of interhousehold caregiving on adult children’s mental health. Psychology and Aging, 4, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vilela, T., Phillips, M., & Minnes, P. (2008). A comparison of challenges faced by parents of adolescents with ABI with and without access to third party funding. Pediatric NeuroRehabilitation, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
Willer, B., Allen, K., Durnan, M.C., & Ferry, A. (1990). Problems and coping strategies of mothers, siblings and young adult males with traumatic brain injury. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 3, 167–173.Google Scholar
Woodford, L.M. (1998). Well-being in older parents of adults with developmental disabilities. Unpublished MA thesis, Department of Psychology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar