Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:53:47.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Long-Term Care Goes to Market: Managed Competition and Ontario's Reform of Community-Based Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

A. Paul Williams ,
Jan Barnsley ,
Sandra Leggat ,
Raisa Deber  and
Pat Baranek
A. Paul Williams
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Jan Barnsley
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Sandra Leggat
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Raisa Deber
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Pat Baranek
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A shift in emphasis from institutions to community poses important challenges for providers and policy makers, key among them being the challenge of providing asufficient volume of high quality community-based services to meet consumer needs. This challenge is particularly evident in community-based long-term care (LTC) due to the complexity and diversity of the field, the vulnerability of the population served, and the current wave of demand for services generated by hospital downsizing. The most recent reform of long-term care in Ontario is of particular interest in this context because, as suggested by the provincial government's maxim “highest quality, best price,” it promises cost-efficiency while maintaining or improving quality. To do this it employs a “managed competition” model in which for-profit and not-for-profit providers compete for service contracts under the auspices of local Community Care Access Centres (CCACs) run by volunteer boards. In this paper we draw on the comments of senior government officials and representatives of provider organizations, as well as published documents, to highlight issues and problems posed by the province's latest reform. We argue that, particularly under conditions of capped budgets and increasing demands, the managed competition process may result in the subordination of service quality and consumer choice to pressures for cost-containment.

Résumé

La désinstitutionnalisation et le virage vers les ressources communautaires posent des défis importants aux décideurs et aux dispensateurs de services, le plus important étant sans nul doute le défi de fournir un volume de services communautaires de haute qualité suffisant à répondre aux besoins de la clientèle. Ce défi est particulièrement évident dans les soins de longue durée (SLD), en raison de la complexité et de la diversité de ce champs d'action, de la vulnérabilité de la clientèle et de l'accroissement de la demande consécutive aux compressions dans le système hospitalier. Dans ce contexte, la dernière réforme des soins de longue durée en Ontario est particulièrement intéressante parce que, comme l'exprime le mot d'ordre gouvernemental «meilleure qualité au meilleur prix,» elle promet la coüt-efficacité tout en assurant le maintien ou l'amélioration de la qualité. Pour y arriver, on a recours à un modèle de «gestion de la concurrence» dans lequel les fournisseurs sans but lucratif et à but lucratif entrent en concurrence pour des contrats de services attribués par des Centres d'accès aux soins communautaires locaux, gérés par un conseil de bénévoles. Dans cette communication, nous avons utilisé les commentaires de hauts fonctionnaires et de représentants de fournisseurs de soins, ainsi que des documents du domaine public, pour mettre en lumière les questions et les problèmes soulevés par cette plus récente réforme provinciale. Nous soumettons que le modèle de gestion de la concurrence pourra entraîner la subordination de la qualité des services et du choix du consommateur aux impératifs de limitation des coûts, particulièrement dans le contexte actuel de budgets fermés et d'augmentation de la demande.

Keywords

Long-Term CareReformCommunity-Based CareCommunity Care Access CentresManaged CompetitionOntarioCanada.Soins de longue duréeréformeservices communautairesCentres d'accès aux soins communautaires locauxgestion de la concurrenceOntarioCanada.
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , Été/Summer 1999 , pp. 125 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ARA Consulting Group. Defining Quality Indicators: a focus group with service providers. Prepared for the Ministry of Health of Ontario, Toronto, 1996.Google Scholar
Baranek, P, Deber, RB, Williams, AP. Reform: long-term care as a prototype. Paper presented at the 7th Canadian Conference on Health Economics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, August 22, 1997.Google Scholar
Barnsley, J, Leggat, S, Williams, AP. Quality Measures Workshop for Managed Competition Project Team. Long-Term Care Division, Ministry of Health, Ontario, April 12, 1996.Google Scholar
Barnsley, J, Lemieux-Charles, L, Baker, R. Selecting clinical outcome indicators for monitoring quality of care. Healthcare Management Forum, 1996; 9(1):5–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beland, F, Arweiler, D. Conceptual framework for development of long-term care policy. 1. constitutive elements. Canadian Journal on Aging, 1996; 15(4):649–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, F, Arweiler, D. Conceptual framework for development of long-term care policy. 2. conceptual model. Canadian Journal on Aging, 1996; 15(4):682–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendick, M. Jr Privatizing the delivery of social welfare services: an ideal to be taken seriously. In: SB, Kamerman, AJ, Kahn eds. Privatization and the Welfare State. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989; 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Columbia, Royal Commission on Health Care and Costs. Closer to Home: The Report of the British Columbia Royal Commission on Health Care and Costs. Victoria, B.C.: Crown Publications, 1991.Google Scholar
Canadian Home Care Association. Portrait of Canada: An Overview of Public Home Care Programs. February, 1998.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, A.Home care nurses strike for contract with private firm. Toronto Star, 1998. January 21: A8.Google Scholar
Chappell, NL. Home care research: what does it tell us? Gerontologist, 1994; 34(1): 116–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coutts, J.Rock wants to elevate home care's status. Toronto Globe and Mail, 1998; March 9: A5.Google Scholar
Coutts, J.Home care crucial to medicare, Rock says. Toronto Globe and Mail, 1998; March 10: A3.Google Scholar
Coyte, PC, Young, W. Reinvestment in and use of home care services. Technical Report No. 97–05–TR, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, November, 1997.Google Scholar
Daubert, EA. Patient classification system and outcome criteria. Nursing Outlook, 1979; 9:7–54.Google Scholar
Deber, R, Williams, AP, Baranek, P, Masnyk-Duvalko, KThe Public-Private Mix in Health Care. Report to the Task Force on the Funding and Delivery of Medical Care in Ontario. Toronto: Department of Health Administration, University of Toronto, 1995.Google Scholar
Deber, RB, Williams, AP. Policy, payment and participation: long-term care reform in Ontario. Canadian Journal on Aging, 1995; 14(2):294–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deber, RB, Williams, AP. Long Term Care Policy and the Public-Private Mix. Grant #6606–5583–302, Health Canada, Health Promotion and Programs Branch, 1996.Google Scholar
Deber, RB, Narine, L, Baranek, P, et al. The Public-Private Mix in Health Care. Report to the National Health Forum. Toronto: Department of Health Administration, University of Toronto, 1996.Google Scholar
DeCoster, C, Smoller, M, Roos, NP, Thomas, E. A comparison of ambulatory care and selected procedure rates in the health care systems of the province of Manitoba, Canada; Kaiser Permanente Health Maintenance Organization; and the United States. Healthcare Management FORUM, 1997, Winter; 10(4):26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Veer, AJE, De Bakker, DH. Measuring unmet needs to assess the quality of home health care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1994; 6(3):267–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donabedian, A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1966; 44(2): 166–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donabedian, A. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Ann Arbor MI: Health Administration Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Evans, RG. Strained Mercy: The Economics of Canadian Health Care. Toronto: Butterworths, 1984.Google Scholar
Foley, W. Developing a patient classification system for homehealth care. PRIDE Institute Journal of Long Term Health Care, 1987; 9:8–4.Google Scholar
Friedson, E. Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Powers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Friedson, E. Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy and Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Government of Ontario Press Releases. Government invests $1.2 billion to improve long-term care in largest-ever expansion of health services. April 29 1998a.Google Scholar
Government of Ontario Press Releases. Jackson announces $19.1 million in increased funding to expand long-term care community services. July 14 1998b.Google Scholar
Harper, T. Home care a heartfelt issue for Rock: Health Minister to face plea for $1 billion in federal funding. Toronto Star, 1998; March 8: A4.Google Scholar
Havens, B. Long-term care diversity with the care continuum. Canadian Journal on Aging, 1995; 14(2):245–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Health Canada. National Health Expenditures in Canada, 1975–1994. Ministry of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, January 1996.Google Scholar
Health Canada. Public Home Care Expenditures in Canada 1975–76 to 1997–98. Ottawa, Policy and Consultation Branch, March 1998.Google Scholar
Health Services and Promotion Branch. Report on Home Care. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services, Health and Welfare Canada, 1990.Google Scholar
Health Services Restructuring Commission. Rebuilding Ontario's Health System: Interim Planning Guidelines and Implementation Strategies. Toronto, July 1997.Google Scholar
Health Services Restructuring Commission. Commission calls for reinvestment of $266 million for capital and $263 million for services in Toronto. April 27 1998.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A.Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Hollander, M.The Costs, and Cost-Effectiveness of Continuing Care Services in Canada. Queen's-University of Ottawa Economic Projects, Ottawa, 1994; 1–113.Google Scholar
Hurley, J, Lomas, J, Bhatia, V. When tinkering is not enough: provincial reform to manage health care resources. Canadian Public Administration, 1994; 37(3):490–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, RA. Home Care: the cornerstone of health renewal in Nova Scotia. Leadership in Health Services 1994; 4:5–14.Google Scholar
Jacobs, P, Hall, E, Henderson, I, Nichols, D. Episodic acute care costs: linking inpatient and home care. Canadian Journal of Public Health 1995; 9:9–5.Google Scholar
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Primer on Indicator Development and Application. Oakbrook Terrence III: JCHAO, 1990.Google Scholar
Judge, K. Value for money in the British residential care industry. In: AJ, Culyer, B, Jonsson, eds. Public and Private Health Services: Complementarities and Conflict. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986; 171–99.Google Scholar
Kramer, AM, Shaughnessy, PW, Bauman, MK, Crisler, KS. Assessing and assuring the quality of home health care: a conceptual framework. The Milbank Quarterly, 1990; 68(3):413–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kushner, C. Laying a Firm Foundation: A Response from Ontario's CCACs. Toronto: October, 1997.Google Scholar
Landsberg, M. Home care privatization squeezes sick to ensure profits. Toronto Star, January 3, 1998: L1.Google Scholar
Metropolitan Toronto District Health Council. Toward a Healthier Tomorrow: Strategies for Promoting Health in Metro Toronto. Toronto: MTDHC Health Promotion and Strategic Policy Committee, 1996.Google Scholar
Miller, R, Lazar, J. Public reporting of performance measures in home care. Journal on Quality Improvement, 1995; 21(3):105–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Health, Long-Term Care Division, Ontario. Community Care Access Centres: Board Orientation. Toronto, June, 1996.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health, Long-Term Care Division, Ontario. Provincial Requirements for the Long-Term Care Request for Proposals Process. Toronto: July, 1997a.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health, Long-Term Care Division. RFP Guide: Tips for Conducting an RFP (Request for Proposals). Toronto, September, 1997b.Google Scholar
Nahmiash, D, Reis, M. An Exploratory Study of Private Home Care Services in Canada. Ottawa: Health and Welfare Canada, 1992.Google Scholar
North York Community Care Access Centre. Operating Results YTD — November/97. January, 1998.Google Scholar
Ontario Nurses' Association. Media Release. Ontario Nurses' Association Blacklists Comeare, Kingston. February 4, 1998.Google Scholar
Ontario Home Health Care Providers' Association. Managed Competition: A Model for In-Home Services. Summary Report from Focus Group Meetings. Toronto, 1995.Google Scholar
Osborne, DE, Gaebler, T. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publications, 1992.Google Scholar
Saltman, RB, von Otter, C. Planned Markets and Public Competition: Strategic Reform in Northern European Health Systems. Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Saltman, RB, von Otter, C. Implementing Planned Markets in Health Care. Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1995Google Scholar
Shapiro, E. There's no place like home. In: Deber R.B &Thompson G.G. eds.Google Scholar
Restructuring Canada's Health Services System: How Do We Get There From Here. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1992; 99–104.Google Scholar
Shapiro, E. The Cost of Privatization: a Case Study of Home Care in Manitoba. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, December, 1997.Google Scholar
Shortell, SM, Kaluzny, AD. Health Care Management (Third Edition). Delmar Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
Simcoe County Community Care Access Centre. Letter to Honourable Elizabeth Witmer. December 23, 1977.Google Scholar
Social Planning Council of Metropolitan Toronto. Merchants of care? The non-profit sector in a competitive social services marketplace. Toronto, April, 1997.Google Scholar
Starr, P.The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books, 1982.Google Scholar
U.S. News Online. How your HMO could hurt you. ttp://www4.usnews.com/us-news/issue/hmos.htm Undated.Google Scholar
U.S. News Online. America's top HMOs. ttp://www4.usnews.com/us-news/nycu/hmohigh.htm 1996.Google Scholar
Williams, AP. Ontario's long-term care reform: empowerment of blame-shifting. Presentation to North York Council on Aging, North York, Ontario, Canada, October 15, 1997.Google Scholar
Williams, AP. Community-based long-term care goes to market: Ontario's “managed care” reform. Presentation to Victoria College Ethics Forum, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, February 2, 1998.Google Scholar
Wright, DA. An analysis of privatization and commercialization: the argument in favour of maintaining a strong voluntary sector in Canada. Toronto: Ontario Association of Visiting Homemaker Services, February, 1990.Google Scholar