Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:40:41.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Heavy Hand of the Law: The Canadian Supreme Court and Mandatory Retirement*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Thomas R. Klassen  and
C. T. Gillin
Thomas R. Klassen
Affiliation:
Trent University
C. T. Gillin
Affiliation:
Ryerson Polytechnic University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the past two decades the Supreme Court of Canada made apparently contradictory rulings on mandatory retirement. In 1982, the Court ruled that mandatory retirement for firefighters at age 60 violated provincial human rights laws; in 1990, it found that forced retirement for university faculty and others at age 65 was constitutional. An analysis of the decisions shows that the Court relied on the stereotype of older workers as being less competent than younger workers, and failed to provide older workers with protection against age-based discrimination. A number of the key mandatory retirement cases deal with university faculty and may yet have unanticipated consequences, such as strengthening the role of academic tenure. The unwillingness of the Supreme Court to eliminate mandatory retirement means that ad hoc arrangements driven by changing life cycles, employer needs, demographic changes and legislative actions will continue to arise.

Résumé

Au cours des deux dernières décennies, la Cour suprême du Canada a rendu des jugements en apparence contradictoires sur la retraite obligatoire. En 1982, la Cour a statué que la retraite obligatoire à 60 ans pour les pompiers violait les lois provinciales sur les droits de la personne; en 1990, elle statuait que la retraite obligatoire à 65 ans pour les professeurs et autres membres du personnel des universités était constitutionnelle. L'analyse de ces décisions montre que la Cour s'est appuyée sur le stéréotype voulant que les travailleurs âgés soient moins compétents que les jeunes et n'a pas accordé aux travailleurs âgés une protection contre la discrimination fondée sur l'âge. Un certain nombre des principaux arrêts en matière de retraite obligatoire portent sur le cas de professeurs d'université et pourraient avoir des conséquences imprévues, comme le renforcement du rôle de la titularisation. La réticence de la Cour suprême à abolir la retraite obligatoire signifie la poursuite d'arrangements ad hoc fondés sur l'évolution des cycles de vie, les besoins des employeurs, les changements démographiques et l'évolution de la législation.

Keywords

Mandatory RetirementAge DiscriminationSupreme Court of CanadaCanadian Charter of Rights and FreedomsHuman Rights.Retraite obligatoirediscrimination fondé sur l'âgeCour suprême du CanadaCharte canadienne des droits et libertésdroits de la personne.
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , Été/Summer 1999 , pp. 259 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Able, R.L. (1988). Comparative sociology of the legal professions. In Abel, R.L. and Lewis, P.S.C. (Eds.), Lawyers in society: Volume III, Comparative theories. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Adams, G.W. (1992). Mandatory retirement and constitutional choices. Kingston: Queen's University, Industrial Relations Centre, Current Issues Series.Google Scholar
Atchley, R. (1976). The sociology of retirement. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Baltes, P.B., & Baltes, M.M. (1990). Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banting, K.G., & Boadway, R. (1997). Reform of retirement income policy: International and Canadian perspectives. Kingston: Queen's University School of Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Belanger, A., & Dumas, J. (1998). Report on the demographic situation in Canada 1997. Cat. No. 91–209-XPE.Google Scholar
Bogart, W.A. (1994). Courts and country: The limits of litigation and the social and political life of Canada. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bur, D.F., & Kehoe, J.K. (1992). Developments in constitutional law: The 1990–91 term. The Supreme Court Law Review [Canada], 3, 403–513.Google Scholar
Chotalia, S.P. (1993). The Supreme Court and mandatory retirement: Sanctioning the status quo. Constitutional Forum, 4(3), 67–70.Google Scholar
Coyne, A. (1996). The case for blowing up our ivory towers. The Globe and Mail, May 4, 1996, pp. D1, D5.Google Scholar
Croll, D.A. (Chairman). (1979). Retirement without tears. A report of the Special Committee on Retirement Age Policies. Hull, PQ: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.Google Scholar
Crystal, S. (1988). Work and retirement in the twenty-first century. Generations 12(3), 60–64.Google Scholar
Cumming, E., & Henry, W.E. (1961). Growing old: The process of disengagement. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Denton, F.T. & Spencer, B.G. (1990). Population aging and the economy: Some issues in resource allocation. In Thornton, J.E. and Winkler, E.R. (Eds.), Ethics and aging: The right to live, the right to die (pp. 98–123). Vancouver: The University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Dunlop, D.P. (1979). Mandatory retirement policy: A human rights dilemma? Ottawa: The Conference Board of Canada.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, N., & Howard, G. (1988). Retirement as a case study. The Advocates' Quarterly, 9(2), 142–159.Google Scholar
Fiss, O.M. (1984). Against settlement. Yale Law Journal, 93, 1073–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, M. (1974). Why the ‘haves’ come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law & Society Review, 9, 96–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillin, C.T., & Klassen, T.R. (1995). Age discrimination and early retirement policies: A comparison of labor market regulation in Canada and the United States. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 7(1), 85–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gower, D. (1997). Retirement age and statistical estimation. In Perspectives on labour and income, 9, 13–20, Catalogue no. 75–001–XPE.Google Scholar
Graebner, W. (1980). A history of retirement. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Guillemard, A.-M. (1997). Re-writing social policy and changes within the life course organization. A European perspective. Canadian Journal on Aging, 16(3), 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, M. (1998). Flexible retirement as an alternative to 65 and out. CD. Howe Institute Commentary, The Pension Papers, No. 106. Toronto: CD. Howe Institute.Google Scholar
Gunderson, M., & Pesando, J. (1988). The case for allowing mandatory retirement. Canadian Public Policy — Analyse de Politiques, 14(1), 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guppy, N. (1989). The magic of 65: Issues and evidence in the mandatory retirement debate. Canadian Journal on Aging, 8(2), 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kesselman, M.L. (1995). Comment: Putting the professor to bed: Mandatory retirement of tenured university faculty in the United States and Canada. Comparative Labour Law Journal, 17, 206–249.Google Scholar
Khan, A.N. (1990). Mandatory retirement age for university professors. Journal of Law & Education, 19(1), 135–146.Google Scholar
Krashinsky, M. (1988) The case for eliminating mandatory retirement: Why economics and human rights need not conflict. Canadian Public Policy — Analyse de Politiques, 14(1), 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaSelva, S.V. (1987). Note: Mandatory retirement: Intergenerational justice and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 20(1), 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, H.D., & McDougal, M.S. (1943). Legal education and pubUc policy: Professional training in the public interest. Yale Law Journal, 52, 203–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBlanc, S., & McMullin, J.A. (1997). Falling through the cracks: Addressing the needs of individuals between employment and retirement. Canadian Public Policy — Analyse de Politiques, 23(3), 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepofsky, M.D. (1992). The Canadian judicial approach to equality rights: Freedom ride or roller coaster? Law and Contemporary Problems, 55(1), 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, M.L. (1988). Age discrimination and the mandatory retirement controversy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
London, J.R. (1989). The Canadian experience in mandatory retirement: A human rights perspective. In Eekelaar, J.M. and Pearl, D. (Eds.), An aging world: Dilemmas and challenges for law and social policy, (pp. 329–362). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lussier, G., & Wister, A.V. (1995). A study of workforce aging of the British Columbia Public Service, 1983–1991. Canadian Journal on Aging, 14(3), 480–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, P. (1994). Canada's courts. Toronto: James Lorimer & Company.Google Scholar
McDonald, L. (1995). Editorial: Retirement for the rich and retirement for the poor: From social security to social welfare. Canadian Journal on Aging, 14(3), 447–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, B.D. (1990). Aging as a social process (2nd ed.). Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Myles, J. (1995). The market's revenge: Old Age Security and social rights. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.Google Scholar
Myles, J., & Street, D. (1995). Should the economic life course be redesigned? Old Age Security in a time of transition. Canadian Journal on Aging, 14(2), 335–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, A.M. (1995). Employer policy and the future of employee benefits for an older population. Generations, 19(3), 63–67.Google Scholar
Roadburg, A. (1985). Aging: Retirement, leisure and work in Canada. Toronto: Methuen.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, G.N. (1991). The hollow hope: Can courts bring about social change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. (1990). A portrait of seniors in Canada. Catalogue Number 89–59. Ottawa. September 1990.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. (1992). Report on the demographic situation in Canada, 1992. Catalogue Number 91–209. Ottawa. November 1992.Google Scholar
Torres-Gil, F.M. (1992). The new aging: Politics and change in America. Westport, Conn.: Auburn House.Google Scholar
Wanner, R.A. (1994). Retirement and the older worker in Canada. In Frideres, J.S., and Bruce, C.J. (Eds.), The impact of an aging population on society, (pp. 79–90). Calgary: University of Calgary Faculty of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S., Cartwright, B., Kagan, R.A., & Friedman, L.M. (1987). Do the “haves” come out ahead? Winning and losing in state Supreme Courts, 1870–1970. Law & Society Review, 21(3), 403–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar