Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:22:05.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Gendered Construction of Elderly Marriage, 1900–1950*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

James G. Snell
Affiliation:
University of Guelph

Résumé

Les ouvrages actuels portant sur la gérontologie soutiennent qu'une renégociation des rôles maritaux et des pouvoirs relatifs se produit chez les couples d'aînés. Ils ne tiennent toutefois pas compte des facteurs structuraux entravant l'apport de changements dans la structure de ces couples. En examinant les politiques publiques des années 1930 et 1940 concernant le programme canadien de pensions de vieillesse, on constate un préjugé systémique et souvent conscient favorisant l'application de ce programme de façon à maintenir la hiérarchie traditionnelle des pouvoirs, fondée sur le sexe, chez les couples d'aînés. Certains aînés ont réagi en modifiant leur statut marital afin de bénéficier au maximum des avantages des politiques publiques.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basch, N. (1982). In the Eyes of the Law: Women, Marriage and Property in Nineteenth-Century New York State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
British Columbia's Welfare. (1947, April). Volume 4(10). British Coloumbia Department of Public Welfare.Google Scholar
Connidis, I.A. (1989). Family Ties and Aging. Toronto: Butter worths.Google Scholar
Essex, M.J., & Nam, S. (1987). Marital Status and Loneliness among Older Women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 93106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, A. (1987). Getting Powerful with Age: Changes in Women over the Life Cycle. Israel Social Science Research, 5, 7686.Google Scholar
Gove, W.R., Style, C.B., & Hughes, M. (1990). The Effect of Marriage on the Weil-Being of Adults: a Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graebner, W. (1980). A History of Retirement: The Meaning and Function of an American Institution, 1885–1978. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, D. (1987). Reclaimed Powers: Toward a New Psychology of Men and Women in Later Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hareven, T. (1982). Family time and industrial time: The relationship between the Family and work in a New England industrial community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hess, B.B. (1979). Sex Roles, Friendship, and the Life Course. Research on Aging, 1, 494515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, B.B., & Markson, E.W. (1980). Aging & Old Age: An Introduction to Social Gerontology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, J.S., & Adcock, A.C. (1990). The Effects of Marital Status on the Form and Composition of Social Networks. Social Science Quarterly, 71, 163174.Google Scholar
Lawton, M.P., Moss, M., & Kleban, M.H. (1984). Marital Status, Living Arrangements, and the Well-Being of Older People. Research on Aging, 6, 323345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, G.R. (1978). Marriage and Morale in Later Life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 131139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, G.R. (1988). Marital Intimacy among Older Persons: the Spouse as Confidant. Journal of Family Issues, 9, 273284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, M.A. (19781979). Social and Psychological Determinants of Adaptation. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 9, 115126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowenthal, M.F., et al. (1976). Four Stages of Life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, M. (1992, September). Providing for Faithful Servants: Pensioners at the CPR. Paper presented at the Conference on Quantitative Canadian Economic History, Vancouver.Google Scholar
McAuley, W.J., Jacobs, M.D., & Carr, C.S. (1984). Older Couples: Patterns of Assistance and Support. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 6, 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plakans, A. (1989). Stepping Down in Former Times: A Comparative Assessment of “Retirement” in Traditional Europe. In Kertzer, D.I. & Schaie, K.W. (Eds.), Age Structuring in Comparative Perspective (pp. 175195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ransom, R.L., & Sutch, R. (1986). The Labor of Older Americans: Retirement of Men On and Off the Job, 1870–1940. Journal of Economic History, 46, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ransom, R.L., & Sutch, R. (1988). The Decline of Retirement in the Years before Social Security: U.S. Retirement Patterns, 1870–1940. In Ricardo-Campbell, R. & Lazear, E.P (Eds.), Issues in Contemporary Retirement (pp. 326). Stanford: Hoover Institute Press.Google Scholar
Smart, C. (1984). The Ties That Bind. London: Rouledge & Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
Snell, J.G. (1990). Filial Responsibility Laws in Canada: An Historical Study. Canadian Journal on Aging, 9(3), 268277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, J.G. (1991). In the Shadow of the Law: Divorce in Canada, 1900–1939. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, J.G. (in press a). The Newfoundland Old Age Pension Programme, 1911–1949. Acadiensis.Google Scholar
Snell, J.G. (in press b). The First Grey Lobby: the Old Age Pensioners' Organization of British Columbia, 19321951. BC Studies.Google Scholar
Todd, J., Friedman, A., & Kariuki, P.W. (1990). Women Growing Stronger with Age: the Effect of Status in the United States and Kenya. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 567577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treas, J. (1975). Aging and the Family. In Woodruff, D.S. & Birren, J.E. (Eds.), Aging: Scientific Perspectives and Social Issues (pp. 99101). New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Trovato, F., & Lauris, G. (1989). Marital Status and Mortality in Canada, 1951–1981. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 907922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vancouver Sun. (1942, November).Google Scholar
Zube, M. (1982). Changing Behaviour and Outlook of Aging Men and Women: Implications for Marriage in the Middle and Later Years. Family Relations, 31, 147156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar