Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:09:23.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formal Assistance Among Dutch Older Adults: An Examination of the Gendered Nature of Marital History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Andrew V. Wister  and
Pearl A. Dykstra
Andrew V. Wister
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
Pearl A. Dykstra
Affiliation:
Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Drawing from life course theory, this article examines gender differences in formal assistance among functionally dependent Dutch older persons within five distinct marital history groups – first-married, never-married, divorced (not remarried), widowed (not remarried) and the remarried. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses are performed for each of the marital history groups to test hypotheses regarding the interrelationships among gender and three sets of variables: 1) measures of age and functional health; 2) measures of socio-economic status; and 3) measures of the social network. The results indicate gendered patterns of formal help use among the first-married, never-married and widowed. Consistent with other studies, older first-married women are approximately three times more likely to receive formal help than are men, a difference that remains robust after statistically controlling for other factors, including frailty of spouse. However, we also find that never-married women are about one-third as likely to use formal help than are never-married men, which may be reflective of different preferences regarding formal service use. Among the widowed, we find that men with poorer functional health are more likely to receive formal help than are their female counterparts, suggesting contrasting patterns of help-seeking behaviour and social vulnerability. Additional differences are observed among the marital history groups in terms of the other independent variables, which are also interpreted from a life course perspective.

Résumé

S'inspirant d'une théorie du cours de la vie, cet article examine les différences entre les sexes reliées à l'aide formelle accordée à des aîné(e)s hollandais(e)s non autonomes sur le plan fonctionnel. On a examiné cinq groupes distincts quant à la situation matrimoniale: gens mariés une seule fois, célibataires, divorcés (non remariés), veufs ou veuves (non remariés) et gens remariés. On a effectué des analyses de régression logistique hiérarchique de chaque catégorie matrimoniale pour vérifier les hypothèses concernant les rapports entre les sexes et trois ensembles de variables: 1) mesure de l'âge et de l'état de santé; 2) mesure de la situation socio-économique et 3) mesure du réseau social. Les résultats font ressortir une configuration par sexe de l'aide formelle utilisée chez les gens mariés une fois, qui n'ont jamais été mariés et chez les veufs ou veuves. Conformément aux autres études, les femmes âgées qui ont été mariées une seule fois sont environ trois fois plus enclines à recevoir de l'aide formelle que les hommes, un écart qui demeure soutenu même après un examen statistique d'autres facteurs, notamment la fragilité du conjoint. Cependant, on remarque aussi que les femmes qui n'ont jamais été mariées sont 66 pour cent moins enclines à recevoir des soins formels que les hommes qui n'ont jamais été mariés, ce qui pourrait être un indice des préférences en ce qui concerne l'utilisation de soins formels. Chez les veufs et les veuves, on constate que les hommes dont la santé est plus fragile auront plus tendance à recevoir des soins formels que leurs homologues féminins, ce qui laisse croire à une configuration différente du comportement à l'égard de la recherche de l'aide et de la vulnérabilité sociale. On remarque d'autres différences de variables chez les groupes, en fonction de leur situation matrimoniale, et elles sont interprétées dans une perspective de cycle de vie.

Keywords

Formal AssistanceGenderMarital History.Aide structuréegenresituation matrimoniale.
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , Hiver/Winter 2000 , pp. 508 - 535
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonucci, T.C. (1994). A life-span view of women's social relations. In Turner, B.F. & Troll, L.E. (Eds.), Women growing older: Psychological perspectives (pp. 239–269). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Antonucci, T.C., & Akiyama, H. (1987). An examination of sex differences in social support in mid life and late life. Sex Roles, 17, 737–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquilino, W. (1994). Later life parental divorce and widowhood: Impact on young adults' assessment of parent-child relations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 908–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arber, S., & Ginn, J. (1991). Gender and later life: A sociological analysis of resources and constraints. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bernard, J. (1973). The future of marriage. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Bozon, M. (1991). Women and the age gap between spouses: An accepted domination? Population, 3, 113–148.Google Scholar
Broese van Groenou, M.B., & Tilburg, T. van (1997). Changes in the support networks of older adults in the Netherlands. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 12, 23–44.Google Scholar
Broese van Groenou, M.B., Tilburg, T. van, Leeuw, E. de, & Liefbroer, A.C. (1995). Appendix: Data collection, In Knipscheer, C.P.M., Jong Gierveld, P.M, van Tilburg, T.G., & Dykstra, P.A. (Eds.), Living arrangements and social networks of older adults (pp. 185–197), Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit University Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, T.H. (1990). Families in later life: A burgeoning research area. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 959–981.Google Scholar
Chappell, N.L. (1990). Living arrangements and sources of caregiving. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 46, 51–58.Google Scholar
Chappell, N.L. (1992). Social support and aging. Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Cochran, M., Larner, M., Riley, D., Gunnarson, L., & Henderson, C.R. (1990). Extending families: The social networks of parents and their children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Connidis, I. (1989). Family ties and aging. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Connidis, I., & McMullin, J. (1994). Social support in older age: Assessing the impact of marital and parent status. Canadian Journal on Aging, 13(4), 510–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooney, T.M. (1993). Recent demographic change: Implications for families planning the future. Marriage and Family Review, 18, 37–55.Google Scholar
Cooney, T.M., & Uhlenberg, P. (1990). The role of divorce in men's relations with their adult children after mid-life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 677–688.Google Scholar
DeMaris, A. (1995). A tutorial in logistic regression. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 956–968.Google Scholar
Dooghe, G. (1992). Informal caregivers of elderly people: A European overview. Ageing and Society, 12, 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dykstra, P.A. (1990a). Next of (non) kin: The importance of primary relationships for older adults' well-being. Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Dykstra, P.A. (1990b). Disentangling the direct and indirect gender effects on the supportive network. In Knipscheer, C.P.M. and Antonucci, T.C. (Eds.), Social network research: Methodological questions and substantive issues (pp. 55–65). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Dykstra, P.A. (1995). Network composition. In Knipscheer, C.P.M., Jong Gierveld, P.M, van Tilburg, T.G., & Dykstra, P.A. (Eds.), Living arrangements and social networks of older adults (pp. 97–114). Amsterdam: VU University Press.Google Scholar
Dykstra, P.A. (1998). The effects of divorce on intergenerational exchanges in families. The Netherlands' Journal of Social Sciences, 33, 77–93.Google Scholar
Eggebeen, D. (1992). Family structure and intergenerational exchanges. Research on Aging, 14, 427–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, G.H. Jr (1978). Approaches to social change and the family. American Journal of Sociology, 84, S1–S38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagestad, G. (1987). Parent-child relations in later life: Trends and gaps in past research. In Lancaster, J.B., Altman, J., Rossi, A.S., & Sherrod, L.R. (Eds.), Parenting across the life span (pp. 405–433). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hagestad, G. (1990). Social perspectives on the life course. In Binstock, R. & George, L. (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 151–168). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hagestad, G., & Neugarten, B. (1985). Age and the life course. In Binstock, R. & Shanas, E. (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 35–61). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Jong Gierveld, J. de (1986). Husbands, lovers and lonliness. In Lewis, R.A. & Salt, R.E. (Eds.), Men in families (pp. 115–125). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Jong Gierveld, J. de (1999). New living arrangements: Older adults between independence and companionship. Paper presented at the European Population Conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, Aug. 30-Sept. 3, 1999.Google Scholar
Kahn, R.L., & Antonucci, T.C. (1980). Convoys over the life course:Attachment, roles and social support. In Baltes, P.B. & Brim, O. (Eds.), Life-span development and behaviour (pp. 253–286). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Karney, B., & Bradbury, T. (1995). The longitudinal course of marriage quality and stability: A review of theory, method and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.Google Scholar
Keith, P.M. (1986). Isolation of the unmarried in later life. Family Relations, 35, 389–395.Google Scholar
Kendig, H., Coles, R., Pittelkow, Y., & Wilson, S. (1988). Confidants and family structure in old age. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 43, S32–S40.Google Scholar
Kobrin, F. (1976). The primary individual and the family: Changes in living arrangements in the United States since 1940. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 233–239.Google Scholar
Liefbroer, A., & Jong Gierveld, J. de (1995). Living arrangements, socio-economic resources, and health. In Knipscheer, C.P.M., Jong Gierveld, P.M, van Tilburg, T.G., & Dykstra, P.A. (Eds.), Living arrangements and social networks of older adults (pp. 15–36). Amsterdam: VU University Press.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, M.F., & Haven, C. (1968). Interaction and adaptation: Intimacy as a critical variable. American Sociological Review, 33, 20–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin Matthews, A. (1991). Widowhood in later life. Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Mugford, S., & Kendig, H. (1986). Social relations: Networks and ties. In Kendig, H. (Ed.), Ageing and families: A social networks perspective (pp. 38–59). Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Mutchler, J., & Bullers, S. (1994). Gender differences in formal care use in later life. Research on Aging, 16, 235–250.Google Scholar
Penning, M. (1990). Receipt of assistance by elderly people: Hierarchical selection and task specificity. The Gerontologist, 30, 220–227.Google Scholar
Peters, A., & Liefbroer, A. (1997). Beyond marital status: Partner history and well-being in old age. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 687–699.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, R. (1987). The never married elderly as a social type: Re-evaluating some images. The Gerontologist, 27, 108–113.Google Scholar
Schiepers, J.M. (1988). Huishoudensequivalentiefactoren volgens de budgetverdelings-methode [Family equivalence scales using the budget distribution methods]. Supplement bij de Sociaal-Economische Maandstatistiek, 2, 28–36.Google Scholar
Soldo, B., Wolf, D., & Agree, E. (1990). Family, households and care arrangements of frail older women: A structural analysis. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 45, S238–S249.Google Scholar
Solinge, H. van (1994). Living arrangements of non-married elderly people in the Netherlands in 1990. Ageing and Society, 14, 219–236.Google Scholar
Spitze, G., & Logan, J. (1989). Gender differences in family support: Is there a payoff? The Gerontologist, 29, 108–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, N. (1995). Gender and adaptation to widowhood in later life. Ageing and Society, 15, 37–58.Google Scholar
Stoller, E.P., & Cutler, S.J. (1992). The impact of gender on configurations of care among married elderly couples. Research on Aging, 14, 313–330.Google Scholar
Stoller, E.P., & Cutler, S.J. (1993). Predictors of use of paid help among older people living in the community. The Gerontologist, 33, 31–40.Google Scholar
Strain, L., & Payne, B. (1992). Social networks and patterns of social interaction among ever-single and separated/divorced elderly Canadians. Canadian Journal on Aging, 11, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilburg, T.G. van (1995). Delineation of the social network and differences in network size. In C. Knipscheer, P.M., Jong Gierveld, P.M, van Tilburg, T.G., & Dykstra, P.A. (Eds.), Living arrangements and social networks of older adults (pp. 83–96). Amsterdam: VU University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, R., La Gory, M., & Sherman, S. (1985). Social ties of the elderly. Sociology and Social Research, 70, 102–106.Google Scholar
Watkins, S.C., Bongaarts, J., & Menken, J. (1987). Demographic foundations of family change. American Sociological Review, 52, 346–358.Google Scholar
Wenger, G.C. (1984). The supportive network: Coping with old age. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Wister, A.V. (1992). Residential attitudes and knowledge, utilization and future use of home support agencies. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 11, 84–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wister, A.V., & Strain, L. (1986). Social support and well-being: A comparison of older widows and widowers. Canadian Journal on Aging, 5, 205–220.Google Scholar
Wu, Z. (1995). Remarriage after widowhood: A marital history study of older Canadians. Canadian Journal on Aging, 14, 719–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar