Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:18:39.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Financial Compensation or Home Help Services: Examining Differences among Program Recipients*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Janice M. Keefe  and
Pamela Fancey
Janice M. Keefe
Affiliation:
Mount Saint Vincent University
Pamela Fancey
Affiliation:
Mount Saint Vincent University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Financial compensation for family members who provide informal care to elderly kin has frequently been discussed but rarely implemented in Canada. One exception is the Nova Scotia Home Life Support Program, which financially compensates family members for the care of the elderly. This study explores differences among caregivers who receive formal services, specifically, financial compensation or home help services. Financially compensated caregivers tend to be younger females who live in non-urban areas and co-reside with the care receiver. In comparison to caregivers who receive home help services, these paid caregivers report a reduction in financial worry but have greater involvement in the care of the elderly and higher levels of time dependence burden. Before implementing financial compensation policies, research which specifically investigates the effect of these programs on caregivers is needed.

Résumé

L'octroi d'une compensation financière aux membres de la famille qui assurent des soins à des parents âgés a fait l'objet de fréquents débats au Canada, mais n'a été implanté qu'en de très rares occasions. L'une de ces exceptions est le Nova Scotia Home Life Support Program, qui accorde une compensation financière aux personnes qui doivent s'occuper d'un parent âgé. La présente étude explore les différences entre les soignants qui bénéficient de services officiels, soit une compensation financière ou des services de soutien à domicile. Les soignants rémunérés sont dans la plupart des cas des jeunes femmes qui habitent hors des zones urbaines et qui résident avec la personne qui reçoit les soins. Comparativement aux soignants qui reçoivent des services d'aide à domicile, les soignants rémunérés signalent une atténuation de leurs inquiétudes de nature économique, mais sont engagés plus à fond dans les soins prodigués et ont une charge plus élevée quant au temps consacré aux soins. Avant d'implanter des programmes de compensation financière pour les soignants, il faudra done procéder à des études portant expressément sur l'impact de ces programmes sur les soignants.

Keywords

Paid CaregiversFinancial Compensation ProgramsHome Care PolicySoignants rémunérésprogrammes de compensation financièrepolitique de soins à domicile
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , Été/Summer 1997 , pp. 254 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arling, G., & McAuley, W. (1983). The feasibility of public payments to family caregiving. The Gerontologist, 23(3), 300–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biegal, D., Bass, D., Schultz, R., & Morycz, R. (1993). Predictors of in-home and out-of-home services use by family caregivers of Alzheimer's disease patients. Journal of Aging and Health, 5(4), 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, J.J. Jr. (1989). Play it again Sam-There is no impact. The Gerontologist, 29(1), 5–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantor, M.H. (1979). Neighbors and friends: An overlooked resource in the informal support system. Research on Aging, 1(4), 434–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, M.H., & Little, V. (1985). Aging and social care. In Binstock, R.H. & Shanas, E. (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 745–781). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Chappell, N.L. (1985). Social support and receipt of home care services. The Gerontologist, 25(1), 47–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chappell, N.L. (1992). Social support and aging. Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Doty, P. (1986). Family care of the elderly: The role of public policy. The Milbank Quarterly, 64(1), 34–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
England, S.E., Linsk, N.L., Simon-Rusinowitz, L., & Keigher, S.M. (1990). Paying kin for care: Agency barriers to formalizing informal care. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 2(2), 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers, A., Pijl, M., & Ungerson, C. (Eds.). (1994). Payments for care. A comparative overview. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Gerald, L.B. (1993). Paid family caregiving: A review of progress and policies. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 5(1/2), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendrickson, M.C. (1988). State tax incentives for persons giving informal care to the elderly. Health Care Financing Review, Annual Supplement, 123–128.Google Scholar
Hokenstad, M., & Johansson, L. (1990). Caregiving for the elderly in Sweden: Program challenges and policy initiatives. In Biegal, D. & Blum, A. (Eds.), Aging and caregiving (pp. 254–270). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Horowitz, A. (1985). Family caregiving to the frail elderly. In Lawton, M.P. & Maddox, G. (Eds.), Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, (pp. 194–246). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Horowitz, A., & Shindelman, L.W. (1983). Social and economic incentives for family caregiving. Health Care Financing Review, 5(2), 25–33.Google Scholar
Keating, N. (1991). Aging in Rural Canada. Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Keefe, J.M. (1992). Shared care: The organization of home care and family caregiving. Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.Google Scholar
Keefe, J.M. (1993). Programs which pay family caregiver to care for the elderly: Underlying policy assumptions.Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Scientific and Educational Meeting of the Canadian Association on Gerontology Annual Scientific,October, 1993.Montreal, Quebec.Google Scholar
Keigher, S. (1991). Wages or welfare: Compensating caregiving in two conservative social welfare states. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 3(3), 83–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keigher, S., & Murphy, C. (1992). A consumer view of family care compensation program for the elderly. Social Science Review, June, 256–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosloski, K., & Montgomery, R. (1994). Investigating predictors of service use by families providing care for dependent elders. Journal of Aging and Health, 6(1), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linsk, N.L., Keigher, S.M., England, S.E., & Simon-Rusinowitz, L. (1995). Comparison of family care of the elderly. In Kane, R.A. & Penrod, J.D. (Eds.), Family caregiving in an aging society. Policy perspectives (pp. 64–91). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Linsk, N., Keigher, S., Simon-Rusinowitz, L., & England, S. (1992). Wages for caring: Compensating family care of the elderly. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Litwak, E. (1985). Helping the elderly: The complementary roles of informal networks and formal systems. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, S.H., Werkner, J.E., & Delaney, P. J. (1989). Relative contribution of help by employed and non-employed sisters to their elderly parents. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 44(1), S36–S44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noelker, L.S., & Bass, B. (1989). Home care for elderly persons: Linkages between formal and informal caregivers. The Gerontologist, 44(2), S63–S70.Google ScholarPubMed
Novak, M., & Guest, C. (1989). Application of a multidimensional caregiver burden inventory. The Gerontologist, 29(6), 798–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rivlin, A., & Wiener, R.J. (1988). Caring for the disabled elderly: Who will pay? Washington: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Sipila, J., & Simon, B. (1993). Home care allowances for the frail elderly: For and against. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 20(3), 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryckman, J., & Nahmiash, D. (1994). Payments for care: The case of Canada. In Evers, A.Pijl, M., & Ungerson, C. (Eds.), Payments for care. A comparative overview (pp. 307–319). Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Stryckman, J., Nahmiash, D., & Lesemann, F. (1992). Payment for care: Canadian report.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Association of Gerontology,October, 1992,Edmonton, Alberta.Google Scholar
Ungerson, C. (1990). The language of care: Crossing the boundaries. In Ungerson, C. (Ed.), Gender and caring. Work and welfare in Britain and Scandinavia (pp. 8–33). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Walker, A. (1983). Care for elderly people: A conflict between women and the state. In Finch, J. & Groves, D. (Eds.), A labour of love: Women, work and caring (pp. 106–128). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Walker, A., Pratt, C., & Eddy, L. (1995). Informal caregiving to aging family members: A critical review. Family Relations, 44, 402–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, F. (1983). Single careers: Employment, housework and caring. In Finch, J. & Groves, D. (Eds.), A labour of love: Women, work and caring (pp. 89–105). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Zarit, S.H., Anthony, C.R., & Boutsellis, M. (1987). Interventions with caregivers of dementia patients: A comparison of two approaches. Psychology and Aging, 2, 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar