Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:20:06.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors Affecting Sons' and Daughters' Caregiving to Older Parents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Lynn M. Crawford
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba*
John B. Bond Jr.
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba*
Robert F. Balshaw
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba*

Abstract

Using variables derived from Attachment Theory, gender differences in several motivational and structural factors on the levels of care provided by adult offspring to their parents are explored. Data from the Winnipeg Parent Support Project on informal helpers who were sons and daughters between the ages of 30 and 64 (n = 79) were analysed. Consistent with previous research, adult daughters reported greater caregiving than sons. The structural variables of Employment, Marriage and Presence of Children did not emerge as significant predictors of caregiving involvement for sons or daughters. Considerable support was found for Attachment Theory. Perceived Parental Dependence, followed by Frequency of Visits, emerged as the strongest predictors of sons' and daughters' caregiving involvement. Perceived Parental Ability accounted for additional variation in daughters', but not sons', caregiving. No support was found for Exchange Theory; reciprocity did not predict caregiving involvement. Implications for understanding the helping behaviour of adult sons and daughters are discussed.

Résumé

L'aide de variables découlant de la théorie de l'attachement, cette étude examine les différences entre les sexes dans les types de soins donnés aux parents par les enfants d'âge adulte en fonction de plusieurs facteurs reposant sur la motivation et la structure. Cette étude analyse des données tirées du «Winnipeg Parent Support Project» (Projet de soutien auprès des parents de Winnipeg), qui portait sur l'aide informelle donnée par les fils et les filles âgés de 30 à 64 ans (n = 179). Soutenant les résultats d'études antérieures, l'analyse a démontré que les filles prodiguent davantage de soins que les fils. Les variables structurelles sur le plan de l'emploi, du mariage et de la présence des enfants n'ont donné aucun indicateur prévisionnel significatif sur la quantité de soins donnés par les fils et les filles. La théorie de l'attachement s'est révélée un facteur important. La dépendance perçue des parents, suivie par la fréquence des visites représentaient les plus importants facteurs d'incitation à la prestation de soins chez les fils et les filles. L'aptitude perçue des parents constituait également une variable chez les filles, mais non chez les fils. Les résultats n'ont pas soutenu la théorie d'échange: le facteur de réciprocité n'a pu permettre de prévoir le degré de participation à la prestation de soins. Les auteurs discutent de l'importance de comprendre le comportement des fils et des filles d'âge adulte qui prêtent main-forte.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archbold, P.G. (1983). Impact of parent-caring on women. Family Relations, 32, 3945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, J. (1985). Family care of the elderly: Underlying assumptions and their consequences. Canadian Journal on Aging, 4(3), 115125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, J. (1990). Women's perspectives on informal care of the elderly: Public ideology and personal experience of giving and receiving care. Aging and Society, 10, 6184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barer, B., & Johnson, C. (1990). A critique of the caregiving literature. The Gerontologist, 39, 2629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baruch, G., & Barnett, R.C. (1983). Adult Daughters' Relationships with their Mothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 601607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, J., Baril, M., Axelrod, S., & Crawford, L. (1990). Support to older parents by middle-aged children. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 9, 163178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, J., & Harvey, C. (1987). Parental support by middle-aged offspring in a rural (Mennonite) setting. Paper presented at the Canadian Association on Gerontology, 16th annual meeting, Calgary, Alberta.Google Scholar
Brody, E.M. (1981). “Women in the middle” and family help to older people. The Gerontologist, 21, 471480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brody, E.M., & Schoonover, C.B. (1986). Patterns of parent-care when adult daughters work and when they do not. The Gerontologist, 26, 372381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantor, M.H. (1983). Strain among caregivers: A study of experience in the United States. The Gerontologist, 23, 597604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cape, R. (1980). Old patients need hope, personal planning, care. Ontario Medical Review, 1, 1116.Google Scholar
Chappell, N., Strain, L., & Blandford, A. (1986). Aging and Health Care: A social perspective. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Cicirelli, V.G. (1981). Helping elderly parents: The role of adult children. Boston: Auburn House.Google Scholar
Cicirelli, V.G. (1983). Adult children's attachment and helping behaviour to elderly parents: A path model. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 815824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cody, R., & Smith, J. (1987). Applied statistics and the SAS programming language (2nd ed.). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Finley, N., Roberts, M., & Banahan, B. (1988). Motivators and inhibitors of attitudes of filial obligation toward aging parents. The Gerontologist, 28, 7378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, B.L. (1989). The role of adult children in helping chronically ill hospitalized parents. Canadian Journal on Aging, 8(1), 6978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon, R.R., & Thiessen, J.D. (1989, November). What adult children do for their aging parents and why. Paper presented at the 51st annual conference of the National Council on Family Relations, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Horowitz, A. (1985). Sons and daughters as caregivers to older parents: Differences in role performance and consequences. The Gerontologist, 25, 612617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horowitz, A., & Shindelman, L.W. (1983). Reciprocity and affection: Past influences on current caregiving. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 5, 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houser, B., Berkman, S., & Bardsley, P. (1985). Sex and birth order differences in filial behaviour. Sex Roles, 13, 641651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendig, H. (Ed.) (1986). Aging and families: A support network's perspective. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kinnear, D., & Graycar, A. (1984). Aging and family dependency. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 19, 1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivett, V. (1988). Older rural fathers and sons: Patterns of association and helping. Family Relations, 37, 6267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, A., & Brody, E.M. (1983). Characteristics of middle-aged daughters and help to their elderly mothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 193201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopata, H.Z. (1979). Women as widows: Support systems. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
McDaniel, S.A. (1986). Canada's aging population. Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Mindel, C.H., & Wright, R. (1982). Satisfaction in multigenerational households. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 483489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, R., Gonyea, J., & Houyman, M. (1982). Caregiving and the experience of subjective and objective burden. Unpublished paper. University of Washington.Google Scholar
Mutran, E., & Reitzes, D. (1984). Intergenerational support activities and well-being among the elderly: a convergence of exchange and symbolic interaction perspectives. American Sociological Review, 49, 117130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neysmith, S.M. (1981). Parental care: Another female family function. Canadian Journal of Social Work Education, 1(2), 5563.Google Scholar
Nissel, M. (1984). The family costs of looking after handicapped elderly relatives. Aging in Society, 4, 185204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, C.J. (1987). Aging and intergenerational relations in Canada. In Marshall, V.W. (Ed.), Aging in Canada:Social perspectives (pp. 311342). Markham: Fitzhenry & Whiteside.Google Scholar
Scharlach, A.E., & Boyd, S.L. (1989). Caregiving and employment: Results of an employee survey. The Gerontologist, 29, 382388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seccombe, K. (1988). Financial assistance from elderly retirement-age sons to their aging parents. Research on Aging, 10, 102118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smallegan, E. (1985). There was nothing else to do: Needs for care before nursing home admission. The Gerontologist, 25, 364370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitze, G., & Logan, J. (1989). Gender differences in family support: Is there a payoff? The Gerontologist, 29, 108114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada. (1984). The Elderly in Canada. Ottawa: Census of Canada, Minister of Supply and Services.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. (1988). Family and friendship ties among Canada's seniors. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services.Google Scholar
Stoller, E.P. (1983). Parental caregiving by adult children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 851858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, E.P. (1985). Exchange patterns in the informal support networks for the elderly: The impact of reciprocity on morale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 335342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, E.P., & Earl, L. (1983). Help with activities of everyday life: Sources of support for the noninstitutionalized elderly. The Gerontologist, 23, 6470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, R., Cafferata, G.L., & Sangl, J. (1987). Caregivers of the frail elderly: A national profile. The Gerontologist, 27, 616626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uhlenberg, P., & Cooney, T. (1990). Family size and mother-child relations in later life. The Gerontologist, 30, 618624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wentowski, G.J. (1981). Reciprocity and the coping strategies of older people: Cultural dimensions of network building. The Gerontologist, 21, 600609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed