Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:13:21.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring Gender Differences in the Relationships between Eldercare and Labour Force Participation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2015

Yeonjung Lee ,
Fengyan Tang ,
Kevin H. Kim  and
Steven M. Albert
Yeonjung Lee*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary
Fengyan Tang
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh
Kevin H. Kim
Affiliation:
School of Education, University of Pittsburgh
Steven M. Albert
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh
*
†La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à : / Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to: Yeonjung Lee, Ph.D., M.S.W. Faculty of Social Work University of Calgary 2500 University Drive NW Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigated the reciprocal relationship between parental caregiving and labour force participation to determine whether (1) caregiving related to subsequent employment; (2) employment related to subsequent caregiving; (3) caregiving and labour force participation had a reciprocal relationship across time; and (4) gender differences existed in these relationships. A cross-lagged panel design was applied with structural equation modeling. The study sample included adult children aged 51 or older with living parents or parents-in-law. No reciprocal relationship was found between caregiving and labour force participation, but gender differences were evident. Women caregivers in 2006 were less likely to be working in 2008, whereas employment status was not related to subsequent caregiving. In contrast, men working in 2008 were less likely to be caregiving in 2010, whereas caregiving was not related to subsequent employment status. Findings suggest that gender plays an important role in the relationship between caregiving and labour force participation.

Résumé

Cette étude a examiné la relation réciproque entre les soins des parents et la participation au marché du travail, afin de déterminer si (1) la prestation de soins est liés à l’emploi subséquent; (2) un emploi est lié à la prestation de soins subséquente; (3) la participation de la prestation de soins et la population travaillant a montré une relation réciproque à travers le temps; et (4) s’il existe des différences entre les sexes dans ces relations. Pour l’analyse, nous avons utilisé la modélisation par équation structurelle. L’échantillon de l’étude comprenait les enfants adultes de 51 ans et plus, vivant avec des parents ou beaux-parents. Aucune relation de réciprocité a été trouvée entre la prestation de soins et la participation de la population active, mais des différences de sexe étaient évidentes. Femmes soignantes en 2006 étaient moins susceptibles de travailler en 2008, bien que le statut d’emploi n’ était pas liée à la prestation de soins subséquente. En revanche, les hommes qui travaillaient en 2008 étaient moins susceptibles d’être engagés dans la prestation de soins en 2010, bien que la prestation de soins n’était pas liée à l’état de l’emploi subséquent. Ces résultats suggèrent que le sexe joue un rôle important dans la relation entre la prestation de soins et la participation au marché du travail.

Keywords

agingcompeting rolescross-lagged panel modelgender differencework-family policyworking caregivervieillissementrôles concurrentsmodélisation par équation structurelledifference entre les sexesmodélisation par equation structurellepolitique travail-famillesoignant travaillant
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 14 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work was supported by School of Social Work and the Asian Studies Center at the University of Pittsburgh.

References

Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 414–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berecki-Gisolf, J., Lucke, J., Hockey, R., & Dobson, A. (2008). Transitions into informal caregiving and out of paid employment of women in their 50s. Social Science & Medicine, 67(1), 122–127. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boaz, R. F. (1996). Full-time employment and informal caregiving in the 1980s. Medical Care, 34(6), 524–536. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199606000-00003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boaz, R. F., & Muller, C. F. (1992). Paid work and unpaid help by caregivers of the disabled and frail elders. Medical Care, 30(2), 149–158. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199202000-00006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bollen, K. A., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2007). A polychoric instrumental variable (PIV) estimator for structural equation models with categorical variables. Psychometrika, 72(3), 309–326. doi: 10.1007/ s11336-007-9006-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, E. M. (1981). “Women in the middle” and family help to older people. The Gerontologist, 21(5), 471–480. doi: 10.1093/geront/21.5.471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmichael, F., & Charles, S. (2003). The opportunity costs of informal care: Does gender matter? Journal of Health Economics, 22(5), 781–803. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00044-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dentinger, E., & Clarkberg, M. (2002). Informal caregiving and retirement timing among men and women: Gender and caregiving relationships in late midlife. Journal of Family Issues, 23(7), 857–879. doi: 10.1177/019251302236598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilworth-Anderson, P., Williams, I. C., & Gibson, B. E. (2002). Issues of race, ethnicity, and culture in caregiving research: A 20-year review. The Gerontologist, 42(2), 237–272. doi: 10.1093/geront/42.2.237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doty, P., Jackson, M. E., & Crown, W. (1998). The impact of female caregivers’ employment status on patterns of formal and informal eldercare. The Gerontologist, 38(3), 331–341. doi: 10.1093/geront/38.3.331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, J. W., Henretta, J. C., Coward, R. T., & Barton, A. J. (1992). Changes in the helping behaviors of adult children as caregivers. Research on Aging, 14(3), 351–375. doi: 10.1177/0164027592143004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ettner, S. L. (1995). The impact of “parent care” on female labour supply decisions. Demography, 32(1), 63–80. doi: 10.2307/2061897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ettner, S. L. (1996). The opportunity costs of elder care. Journal of Human Resources, 31(1), 189–205. doi: 10.2307/146047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evandrou, M., Glaser, K., & Henz, U. (2002). Multiple role occupancy in midlife: Balancing work and family life in Britain. The Gerontologist, 42(6), 781–789. doi: 10.1093/geront/42.6.781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data (Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. I., & Scharlach, A. E. (2001). Families and work: New directions in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, R., & Willis, R. (2005). Survey design and methodology in the Health and Retirement Study and the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study. In Waite, L. J. (Ed.), Aging, Health, and Public Policy: Demographic and Economic Perspectives (pp. 209–235). New York, NY: Population Council.Google Scholar
Health and Retirement Study (HRS). (2011). Sample sizes and response rates. Retrieved online (12 December 2014) from http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/sampleresponse.pdf.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. H., Hammer, L. B., Neal, M. B., & Perrin, N. A. (2004). The relationship between work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict: A longitudinal study. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 25(1), 79–100. doi: 10.1023/B: JEEI.0000016724.76936.a1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. E., & Moen, P. (2002). Retirement transitions, gender, and psychological well-being: A life-course, ecological model. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57 B(3), 212–222. doi: 10.1093/geronb/57.3.P212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kossek, E. E., Colquitt, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2001). Caregiving decisions, well-being and performance: The effects of place and provider as a function of dependent type and work-family climates. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 29–44. doi: 10.2307/3069335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 9, 179–186. doi: doi:10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S. Y., & Xu, L. (2003). Local influence analysis of structural equation models with continuous and ordinal categorical variables. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 56(2), 249–270. doi: 10.1348/000711003770480039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, Y., & Tang, F. (in press). More caregiving, less working: Caregivers roles and gender differences. Journal of Applied Gerontology, DOI: 10.1177/0733464813508649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levande, D. I., Herrick, J. M., & Sung, K.-T. (2000). Eldercare in the United State and South Korea. Journal of Family Issues, 21(5), 632–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCallum, R., Widaman, K., Preacher, K., & Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(4), 611–637. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_06.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLanahan, S. S., & Monson, R. A. (1990). Caring for the elderly: Prevalence and consequences. A National Survey of Families and Households. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Center for Demography and Ecology.Google Scholar
Mellor, J. M. (2000). Filling in the gaps in long term care insurance. In Meyer, M. H. (Ed.), Care Work: Gender, Labour and the Welfare State (pp. 202–216). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Menard, S. (1991). Longitudinal Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Mentzakis, E., McNamee, P., & Ryan, M. (2009). Who cares and how much: Exploring the determinants of co-residential informal care. Review of Economics and the Household, 7(3), 283–303. doi: 10.1007/s11150-008-9047-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Alliance for Caregiving and American Association of Retired Persons. (2009). Caregiving in the U.S. Bethesda, MD: NAC.Google Scholar
Neal, M. B., Ingersoll-Dayton, B., & Starrels, M. E. (1997). Gender and relationship differences in caregiving patterns and consequences among employed caregivers. The Gerontologist, 37(6), 804–816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moen, P., Robison, J., & Fields, V. (1994). Women’s work and caregiving role: A life course approach. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 49(4), S176–S186. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.4.S176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, M. B., & Hammer, L. B. (2007). The sandwiched generation: Introduction. In Neal, M. B. & Hammer, L. B. (Eds.), Working Couples Caring for Children and Aging Parents (pp. 3–19). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pavalko, E. K., & Artis, J. E. (1997). Women’s caregiving and paid work: Causal relationships in late midlife. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 52 B(4), S170–S179. doi: 10.1093/geronb/52B.4.S170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavalko, E. K., & Henderson, K. A. (2006). Combining care work and paid work: Do workplace policies make a difference? Research on Aging, 28(3), 359–374. doi: 10.1177/0164027505285848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavalko, E. K., & Woodbury, S. (2000). Social roles as process: Caregiving careers and women’s health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(1), 91–105. doi: 10.2307/2676362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pohl, J. M., Collins, C. E., & Given, C. W. (1998). Longitudinal employment decisions of daughters and daughters-in-law after assuming parent care. Journal of Women & Aging, 10(1), 59–74. doi: 10.1300/J074v10n01_05.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Scharlach, A. E. (1994). Caregiving and employment: Competing or complementary roles? The Gerontologist, 34(3), 378–385. doi: 10.1093/geront/34.3.378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scharlach, A. E., Gustavson, K., & Dal Santo, T. S. (2007). Assistance received by employed caregivers and their care recipients: Who helps care recipients when caregivers work full time? The Gerontologist, 47(6), 752–762. doi: 10.1093/geront/47.6.752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spiess, C. K., & Schneider, A. U. (2003). Interactions between care-giving and paid work hours among European midlife women, 1994 to 1996. Ageing & Society, 23(1), 41–68. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X02001010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, D. A., & Soldo, B. J. (1994). Married women’s allocation of time to employment and care of elderly parents. The Journal of Human Resources, 29(4), 1259–1276. doi: 10.2307/146140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, H., & Grundy, E. (2008). Longitudinal perspectives on caregiving, employment history and marital status in midlife in England and Wales. Health and Social Care in the Community, 16(4), 388–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00750.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed