Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:29:42.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ethics of Autonomy and Dignity in Long-Term Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Daryl Pullman
Daryl Pullman
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Efforts to address the “paradox of autonomy in long-term care” attempt to salvage an ethic of autonomy by redefining the central concept, and then applying it to the long-term care environment. Such attempts are critiqued, and an alternative ethic of dignity for long-term care is developed. Autonomy, it is argued, is crucial to certain aspects of dignity, but should not be confused with the whole of it. Indeed, long after the capacity for autonomy has diminished or vanished, basic dignity continues to exert normative force.

Résumé

Les tentatives visant à aborder le «paradoxe de l'autonomie dans le domaine des soins de longue durée» tentent de sauver une éthique de l'autonomie en donnant une nouvelle définition à cette éthique et en essayant de l'appliquer au contexte des soins de longue durée. L'auteur critique ces tentatives et propose une autre façon d'aborder ces problèmes: l'éthique de la dignité. Il est soutenu que l'autonomie est fondamentale à certains aspects de la dignité, mais qu'elle ne doit pas être confondue avec celle-ci. En effet, bien après que l'autonomie ait été compromise ou même lorsqu'elle a cessé d'exister, la dignité humaine de base maintient son pouvoir normatif.

Keywords

AutonomyDignityEthicsPaternalism.Autonomiedignitééthiquepaternalisme.
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , printemps/Spring 1999 , pp. 26 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agich, George J. (1993). Autonomy and long-term care. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom L., & Childress, James F. (1989). Principles of biomedicai ethics (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benner, P., & Wrubel, J. (1989). The primacy of caring: Stress and coping in health and illness. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Blackhall, Leslie J. et al. (1995). Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, Dan. (1984). Autonomy: A moral good, not a moral obsession. Hastings Center Report, 14(5), 40–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collopy, B.J. (1988). Autonomy in long term care: Some crucial distinctions. The Gerontologist, 28(Supplement), 10–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collopy, B.J., Dubler, N., & Jennings, B. (1990). The ethics of home care: Autonomy and accommodation. Hastings Center Report, 20(Supplement), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collopy, B.J., Boyle, P., & Jennings, B. (1991). New directions in nursing home ethics. Hastings Center Report Special Supplement, March-April, 1–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Dales, Richard C. (1979). A medieval view of human dignity. Journal of the History of Ideas, 38(4), 557–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, Susan. (1996). Exercising restraint: autonomy, welfare and elderly patients. Journal of Medical Ethics, 22(3), 160–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dresser, Rebecca. (1995). Dworkin on dementia: Elegant theory, questionable policy. Hastings Center Report, November-December, 32–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dworkin, Ronald. (1986). Autonomy and the demented self. Milbank Quarterly, 64(Supplement 2), 4–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dworkin, Ronald. (1993). Life's dominion. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Firlik, Andrew. (1991). Margo's logo. Journal of the American Medical Association, 265(2) (January 9), 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadow, S.A. (1985). “Nurse and patient: The caring relationship.” In Bishop, A.H. & Scudder, J.R. Jr (Eds.), Caring, curing, coping: Nurse, physician, patient relationships (pp. 31–43). Birmingham, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Gamroth, Lucia M. et al. (Eds.) (1994). Enhancing autonomy in long-term care. NewYork: Springer.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David. (1986). Morals by agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gaylin, Willard. (1984). In defense of the dignity of being human. Hastings Centre Report, 14(4), 18–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodin, Robert E. (1981). The political theories of choice and dignity. American Philosophical Quarterly, 18(2), 91–100.Google Scholar
Haezrahi, Pepita. (1961–1962). The concept of man as end-in-himself. Kant-Studien, 53, 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendin, Herbert. (1995). Selling death and dignity. Hastings Center Report, 25(3)(May-June), 19–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henkin, Alice H. (1979). Human dignity: The internationalization of human rights New York: Aspen Institute for Humanities Studies.Google Scholar
Hofland, Brian F. (1988). Autonomy in long term care: Background issues and a programmatic response. The Gerontologist, 28(Supplement), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, Soren. (1995). Not just autonomy — the principles of American biomedicai ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 21, 332–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, M. (1984). Caretakers' views on responsibilities for the care of the demented elderly. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 32(9), 657–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jameton, Andrew. (1988). In the borderlands of autonomy: Responsibility in long term care facilities. The Gerontologist, 28(Supplement, June), 18–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kane, Rosalie A., & Caplan, Arthur C. (Eds.). (1990). Everyday ethics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
kant, Immanuel. (1987). Fundamental principles of the metaphysics of morals (Abbott, T.K., trans.). Buffalo: Prometheus Books. Original work published 1785.Google Scholar
Kleinig, John. (1991). Valuing Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidz, W., Fischer, Lynn, & Arnold, Robert M. (1992). The erosion of autonomy in long-term care. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Richard J., & Post, Stephen G.. (1992). Human dignity, dementia, and the moral basis of caring. In Binstock, Robert H. et al. (Eds.), Dementia and aging: Ethics, values, and policy choices (pp. 55–88). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
Meyer, Michael J. (1995). Dignity, death and modern virtue. American Philosophical Quarterly, 32(1), 45–55.Google Scholar
Moody, Harry R. (1992). A critical view of ethical dilemmas in dementia. In Binstock, Robert H. et al. (Eds.) Dementia and aging: Ethics, values, and policy choices (pp. 86–100). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney General) (1993), 107 D.L.R. (4th) 342 (S.C.C.)Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen (1981). The tyranny of principles. Hastings Center Report, 1(16), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veatch, Robert M. (1984). Autonomy's temporary triumph. Hastings Center Report, 14 (5), 38–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed