Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:19:46.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural Preferences and Economic Constraints: The Living Arrangements of Elderly Canadians*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2009

Lisa Kaida ,
Melissa Moyser  and
Stella Y. Park
Lisa Kaida*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Department of Sociology
Melissa Moyser*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Department of Sociology
Stella Y. Park*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Department of Sociology
*
†Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to: / La correspondance et les demandes de tirés -à-part doivent être adressées à : Lisa Kaida; Melissa Moyser; Stella Y. Park Department of Sociology University of Toronto 725 Spadina Avenue Toronto, Ontario M5S 2J4 Phone: 416-946-4060 Fax: 416-978-3963 ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected])
†Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to: / La correspondance et les demandes de tirés -à-part doivent être adressées à : Lisa Kaida; Melissa Moyser; Stella Y. Park Department of Sociology University of Toronto 725 Spadina Avenue Toronto, Ontario M5S 2J4 Phone: 416-946-4060 Fax: 416-978-3963 ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected])
†Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to: / La correspondance et les demandes de tirés -à-part doivent être adressées à : Lisa Kaida; Melissa Moyser; Stella Y. Park Department of Sociology University of Toronto 725 Spadina Avenue Toronto, Ontario M5S 2J4 Phone: 416-946-4060 Fax: 416-978-3963 ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using data from the 2001 Census Public Use Microdata Files on Individuals, we examine the role of cultural preferences and economic constraints in elderly Canadians’ choice of living arrangements (living with one’s children and/or other relatives versus living independently). We find that members of ethnic groups holding familistic cultural values (Italian, Chinese, South Asian, and East Indian) are more likely than their individualistic counterparts (British, German, and Dutch) to live with kin. Economic disadvantage also entails a greater likelihood of living with kin. However, the relative importance of cultural preferences and economic constraints as determinants of living arrangements among the elderly depends on marital status. Among the married, cultural preferences explain a greater proportion of the variation in living arrangements; among the non-married, economic constraints do. This research contributes a more nuanced understanding of living arrangements among the elderly than its predecessors, which neglected the role of marital status.

Résumé

Utilisant les donnés du recensement canadien de 2001, nous examinons le rôle des préférences culturelles et des contraintes économiques sur la situation domestique des personnes âgées (vivre avec son enfant et/ou une personne apparentée versus vivre de façon autonome). Nos analyses révèlent que les membres de groupes ethniques partageant des valeurs familialistes (italien, chinois, sud-asiatique, et indien d’Asie) sont plus susceptibles que leur homologues individualistes (britannique, allemand, et néerlandais) de vivre avec un proche parent. Toutefois, l’importance des préférences culturelles et des contraintes économiques dépendent en grande partie de l’état matrimonial. Pour les personnes mariées, les préférences culturelles expliquent une grande proportion de la variation des situations domestiques. Pour ce qui est des personnes célibataires, les contraintes économiques sont plus importantes. En comparaison avec les études antérieures, où celles-ci négligent le rôle de l’état matrimonial, cette recherche contribue à une compréhension plus nuancée de la situation domestique des personnes âgées.

Keywords

vieillissementarrangements de viepréferences culturellescontraintes économiquesle recensement de 2001régression logiqueagingliving arrangementscultural preferenceeconomic constraints2001 Censuslogistic regression
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 303 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Population Society, Learned Societies meeting, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 31 May 2007. Authorship is listed in alphabetical order; work undertaken for the paper is equally shared by the authors. This paper was partly funded by the “Immigration and Immigrant Integration” project associated with Professor Monica Boyd’s Canada Research Chair.

References

Angel, J., Angel, R., & Markides, K. (2000). Late life immigration, changes in living arrangements and headship status among older Mexican-origin individuals. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 389–403.Google Scholar
Angel, R., & Tienda, M. (1982). Determinants of extended household structure: Cultural pattern or economic need? American Journal of Sociology, 87, 1360–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, A. (1999). Social support and life satisfaction among the never married: Examining the effects of age. Research on Aging, 21, 46–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beresford, J.C., & Rivlin, A.M. (1966). Privacy, poverty and old age. Demography, 3, 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, M. (1991). Immigration and living arrangements: Elderly women in Canada. International Migration Review, 25, 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, J.A., & Mutchler, J.E. (1992). The living arrangements of unmarried elderly Hispanic females. Demography, 29, 93–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burr, J.A., & Mutchler, J.E. (1993). Ethnic living arrangements: Cultural convergence or cultural minifestation? Social Forces, 72, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, J.A., & Mutchler, J.E. (1999). Race and ethnic variation in norms of filial responsibility among older persons. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 674–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. (2000). The residency decision of elderly Indonesians: A nested logit analysis. Demography, 37, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerber, L.M. (1983). Ethnicity still matters: Socio-demographic profiles of the ethnic elderly in Ontario. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 15, 60–80.Google Scholar
Kamo, Y., & Zhou, M. (1994). Living arrangements of elderly Chinese and Japanese in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 544–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, D.W. (2005). Cultural factors and preferred living arrangement of aging Chinese Canadians. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 19(2), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, D.W., Tsang, K.T., Chappell, N., Lai, D.C.Y., & Chau, S.B.Y. (2007). Relationships between culture and health status: A multi-site study of the older Chinese in Canada. Canadian Journal on Aging, 26, 171–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, G.Y., & Angel, R.J. (2002). Living arrangements and Supplemental Security Income use among elderly Asians and Hispanics in the United States: The role of nativity and citizenship. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28, 553–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, J., Brown, J.W., Krause, N.M., Ofstedal, M.B., & Bennett, J. (2005). Health and living arrangements of older Americans: Does marriage matter? Journal of Aging and Health, 17, 305–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michael, R.T., Fuchs, V.R., & Scott, S.R. (1980). Changes in the propensity to live alone—1950-1976. Demography, 17, 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B.A. (2001). Ethnocultural reproduction and attitudes towards cohabiting relationships. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 38, 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phua, V.C., Kaufman, G., & Park, K.S. (2001). Strategic adjustments of elderly Asian Americans: Living arrangements and headship. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32, 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada. (2002). 2001 Census dictionary. Ottawa: Author (Catalogue no. 92-378-XIE). Retrieved December 10, 2006, from www12.statcan.ca/english/census01/Products/Reference/dict/appendices/92-378-XIE02002.pdf.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. (2006). 2001 Census Public Use Microdata File—Individuals file user documentation, revision 2. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author (Catalogue no. 95M0016XCb).Google Scholar
Thomas, K., & Wister, A. (1984). Living arrangements of older women: The ethnic dimension. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turcotte, M., & Schellenberg, G. (2007). A portrait of seniors in Canada, Ottawa: Statistics Canada (Catalogue no. 89-519-XIE). Retrieved February 27, 2007, from www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/89-519-XIE/89-519-XIE2006001.pdf.Google Scholar
Wilmoth, J.M. (2001). Living arrangements among older immigrants in the United States. The Gerontologist, 41, 228–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilmoth, J.M., DeJong, G.F., & Himes, C.L. (1997). Immigrant and non-immigrant living arrangements among America’s White, Hispanic, and Asian elderly population. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 17(9–10), 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar