Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:46:40.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Caring Sons: Exploring Men's Involvement in Filial Care*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Lori D. Campbell  and
Anne Martin-Matthews
Lori D. Campbell
Affiliation:
McMaster University
Anne Martin-Matthews
Affiliation:
The University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates socio-demographic, family structure and other factors that predict men's filial care involvement. The concepts guiding this investigation are related to family obligations or motivations to provide care — commitment to care, legitimate excuses, and caring by default. Data for this research come the Work and Eldercare Research Group of CARNET: The Canadian Aging Research Network. This work is based on a sample of 772 men who provide assistance to older parents or parents-in-law. Overall, findings demonstrate the value of the conceptual framework for explaining variations in men's care. For example, distance constraints and the commitment of young children, appear to be legitimate reasons for less care involvement. Further, living nearby and being without siblings may “default” men into being more involved in care. This research recognizes men's filial care as a more complex issue than a ‘gender difference’ focus on caregiving has allowed.

Résumé

Cette étude examine la structure familiale et socio-démographique et d'autres facteurs permettant de prédire l'engagement des hommes dans les soins à leurs parents. Les concepts qui ont guidé l'étude sont reliégitimes, soins forcés. Les données de la recherche sont tirées des travaux d'un groupe de recherche sur les soins aux aîné(e)s (Work and Eldercare Research Group) du Réseau canadien de la recherche sur le vieillissement (CARNET). Les travaux reposent sur un échantillon de 772 hommes qui fournissent de l'aide à leurs parents ou leurs beaux-parents âgés. Dans l'ensemble, les résultats démontrent la valeur du cadre conceptuel de l'explication des variables dans les soins accordés par les hommes. Ainsi, les contraintes de distance et les obligations envers de jeunes enfants semblent des raisons légitimes pour réduire son engagement. De plus, le fait d'habiter près et d'être fils unique peut «obliger» les hommes à s'engager dans les soins. Cette recherche fait ressortir la plus grande complexité de la question des soins filiaux accordés par les hommes par rapport à l'examen de la question dans une perspective de «différence entre les sexes».

Keywords

Filial CaregivingMen's CaregivingSoins filiauxsoins fournis par les hommes
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , Spring/Printemps 2000 , pp. 57 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

E.K., Abel (1990). Family care of the frail elderly. In Abel, E. K. & Nelson, M. K, (Eds.), Circles of care: Work and identity in women's lives (pp. 65–91). Albany: University of New York Press.Google Scholar
E.K., Abel, & M.K., Nelson (1990). Circles of care: An introductory essay. In Abel, E.K. & Nelson, M.K. (Eds.), Circles of care: Work and identity in women's lives (pp. 1–34). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
S., Arber, & G.N., Gilbert (1989a). Transitions in caring: Gender, life course and the care of the elderly. In Bytheway, B., Keil, T., Allatt, P., & Bryman, A. (Eds.), Becoming and being old: Sociological approaches to later life (pp. 72–92). London: Sage.Google Scholar
S., Arber, & G.N., Gilbert (1989b). Men: The forgotten carers. Sociology, 23 (1)111–118.Google Scholar
Blieszner, R., & Hamon, R.R. (1992). Filial responsibility: Attitudes, motivators, and behaviors. In Dwyer, J.W. & Coward, R.T. (Eds.), Gender, families, and eldercare (pp. 105–119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
E.M., Brody (1986). Filial care of the elderly and changing roles of women (and men). Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19 (2)175–201.Google Scholar
Brody, E.M., Litvin, S.J., Albert, S.M., & C.J., Hoffman (1994). Marital status of daughters and patterns of parent care. The Journals of Gerontology, 49, S95–S103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
C.F., Chang, & S.I., White-Means (1991). The men who care: An analysis of male primary caregivers who care for frail elderly at home. The Journal of Applied Gerontology, 10 (3)343–358.Google Scholar
V.G., Cicirelli (1983). Adult children's attachment and helping behavior to elderly parents: A path model. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 815–824.Google Scholar
I.A., Connidis, C.J., Rosenthal, & J.A., McMullin (1996). The impact of family composition on providing help to older parents: A study of employed adults. Research on Aging, 18 (4)402–429.Google Scholar
R.T., Coward, & J.W., Dwyer (1990). The association of gender, sibling network composition, and patterns of parent care by adult children. Research on Aging, 12 (2)158–181.Google Scholar
L.M., Crawford, J.B., Bond Jr., & R.F., Balshaw (1994). Factors affecting sons' and daughters' caregiving to older parents. Canadian Journal on Aging, 13 (4)454–469.Google Scholar
K.J., Daly (1992). Toward a formal theory of interactive resocialization: The case of adoptive parenthood. Qualitative Sociology, 15 (4)395–417.Google Scholar
Dienhart, A. E. (1995). Men and women co-constructing fatherhood through shared parenthood: Beyond the dominant discourse? Doctoral dissertation. Department of Family Studies, University of Guelph.Google Scholar
J.W., Dwyer, & R.T., Coward (1991). A multivariate comparison of the involvement of adult sons versus daughters in the care of impaired parents. Journal of Gerontology, 46 (5)S259–269.Google Scholar
J.W., Dwyer, & R.T., Coward (1992). Gender and family care of the eldrly: Research gaps and opportunities. In Dwyer, J.W. & Coward, R.T. (Eds.), Gender, families, and eldercare (pp. 151–164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
J., Finch (1989). Family obligations and social change. Cambridge, MA.: Polity Press and Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
J., Finch, & Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating family responsibilities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
N.J., Finley, M.D., Roberts, & B.F., Banahan (1988). Motivators and Inhibitors of attitudes of final obligation toward aging parents. The Gerontologist, 28 (1)73–78.Google Scholar
A., Horowitz (1985). Sons and daughters as caregivers to older parents: Differences in role performance and consequences. The Gerontologist, 25, 612–617.Google Scholar
A.E., Joseph, & B.C., Hallman (1996). Caught in the triangle: The influence of home, work and elder location on work-family balance. Canadian Journal on Aging, 15 (3)393–412.Google Scholar
L.W., Kaye, & J.S., Applegate (1990). Men as caregivers to the elderly: Understanding and aiding unrecognized family support. Lexington, MA: Lexington.Google Scholar
L., Lawton, M., Silverstein, & Bengtson, V. (1994). Affection, social contact, and geographic distance between adult children and their parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 57–68.Google Scholar
Lee, G.R. (1992). Gender differences in family caregiving: A fact in search of a theory. In Dwyer, J.W. & Coward, R.T. (Eds.), Gender, families, and eldercare (pp. 120–131). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
G.R., Lee, J.W., Dwyer, & R.T., Coward (1993). Gender differences in parent care: Demographic factors and same-gender preferences. Journal of Gerontology, 48, S9–S16.Google Scholar
D., Lipovenko. (1997). Caregiving taking toll, survey finds, in Globe & Mail, August 20,1997.Google Scholar
V.W., Marshall, C.J., Rosenthal, & J., Daciuk (1987). Older parents' expectations for filial support. Social Justice Research, 1 (4)405–424.Google Scholar
A., Martin Matthews, & L.D., Campbell (1995). Gender roles, employment and informal care. In Arber, S. & Ginn, J. (Eds.), Connecting gender and ageing: Sociological approaches to gender relations in later life (pp. 129–143). London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
S.H, Matthews & T.T., Rosner (1988). Shared filial responsibility: The family as the primary caregiver. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 185–195.Google Scholar
B., Miller (1990). Gender differences in spouse management of the caregiver role. In Abel, E.K. & Nelson, M.K., (Eds.), Circles of care: Work and identity in women's lives (pp. 92–104). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
R.J.V., Montgomery, & Y., Kamo (1989). Parent care by sons and daughters. In Mancini, J.A. (Ed.), Aging parents and adult children (pp. 213–230). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
R.J.V., Montgomery, & M., McGlinn Datwyler (1992). Women and men in the caregiving role. In Glasse, L. & Hendricks, J. (Eds.), Gender and aging: Generations and aging series. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
A.C., Mui (1995). Caring for frail elderly parents: A comparison of adult sons and daughters. The Gerontologist, 35 (1)86–93.Google Scholar
S.M., Neysmith (1995). Feminist methodologies: A consideration of principles and practice for research in gerontology. Canadian Journal on Aging, 24 (Supplement 1)100–118.Google Scholar
A., Oakley (1984). The sociology of housework. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
C.E., Ross (1987). The division of labor at home. Social Forces, 65, 816–833.Google Scholar
M., Silverstein, & Litwak, E. (1993). A task specific typology of intergenerational family structure in later life. The Gerontologist, 33, 258–264.Google Scholar
G., Spitze, J.R., Logan, G., Deane, & S., Zerger (1994). Adult children's divorce and intergenerational relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 279–293.Google Scholar
M.E., Starrels, B., Ingersoll-Dayton, M.B., Neal, & H., Yamada (1995). Intergenerational solidarity and the workplace: Employees' caregiving for their parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 51–762.Google Scholar
E.P., Stoller (1990). Males as helpers: The role of sons, relatives, and friends. The Gerontologist, 30, 228–235.Google Scholar
E.P., Stoller, L.E., Forster, & T.S., Duniho (1992). Systems of parent care within sibling networks. Research on Aging, 14 (1)28–49.Google Scholar
A., Strauss, & J., Corbin (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
A.J., Walker (1992). Conceptual perspectives on gender and family caregiving. In Dwyer, J.W. & Coward, R.T. (Eds.), Gender, families, and eldercare (pp. 34–46). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
R.F., Young, & E., Kahana (1989). Specifying caregiver outcomes: Gender and relationship aspects of caregiving strain. The Gerontologist, 29, 660–666.Google Scholar