Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:30:38.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attitudes and Sentencing for Sexual Assault as a Function of Age and Sex of Subjects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

A. Daniel Yarmey
A. Daniel Yarmey
Affiliation:
University of Guelph
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A total of 768 older and younger men and women with average ages of 58 and 20 years, respectively, made judgments of recommended imprisonment for a rapist after learning about one of eight different versions of sexual assaults. Younger subjects in contrast to older subjects recommended longer sentences. The most severe sentences were given by young males for the assault of a demure woman. Older males were least punitive in sentencing. A reliable interaction among age of subjects, sex of subjects and victim demeanor indicated that younger and older women recommended similar jail sentences when a demure woman was victimized but older women were less punitive when a provocative woman was assaulted. The demeanor of the rapist (well-dressed vs. poorly-dressed) and the resistance/nonresistance of the victim failed to influence sentencing. Older persons and males were found to hold reliably higher anti-victim, pro-rape myth sentiments than younger adults and females.

Résumé

Un groupe composé de 768 hommes et femmes, dont la moyenne d' âge est de 58 ans chez les plus àgés et de 20 ans chez les plus jeunes, ont pris connaissance d'un viol relaté de huit façons différentes, et ont été inviteés à recommander qu'une peine d'emprisonnement soit appliquée au violeur. Les sujets jeunes ont recommandé des peines plus longues que les sujets plus âgés. Les peines les plus sévères ont été recommandées par les sujets masculins jeunes dans le cas du viol perpétré sur une femme modeste dans sa tenue, les sujets masculins plus âgés s'avérant moins sévères. Une interaction fiable entre l'âge et le sexe des sujets d'une part et la tenue de la victime d' autre part révèle que les femmes tant âgées que jeunes rendent des sentences comparables quand la victime a une tenue modeste, mais que les femmes âgées sont moins sévères lorsque la victime est provocante. La tenue vestimentaire du violeur (bien ou mal habillé) et la résistance/non-résistance de la victime n'influent pas sur la sentence rendue. Les sentiments hostiles à la victime et favorables au viol (sous sa forme mythique) sont plus courants chez les personnes âgées et les hommes que chez les jeunes et les femmes.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 1985 , pp. 20 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnett, N.J., & Feild, H.S. (1977). Sex differences in university students' attitudes toward rape. Journal of College Student Personnel, 18, 93–96.Google Scholar
Burt, M.R., & Albin, R.S. (1981). Rape myths, rape definitions, and probability of conviction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 212–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cann, A., Calhoun, L.G., & Selby, J.W. (1979). Attributing responsibility to the victim of rape: Influence of information regarding past sexual experience. Human Relations, 32, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, L.G., Selby, J.W., & Warring, LJ. (1976). Social perception of the victim's causal role in rape. Human Relations, 29, 517–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doob, L.W. (1971). Patterning of time. New Haven; Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Feild, H.S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: a comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 156–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feild, H.S. (1979). Rape trials and jurors' decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 261–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraisse, P. (1963). The psychology of time. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Himmelstein, J.L., & McRae, J.A. Jr. (1984). Social conservatism, New Republicans, and the 1980 election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 592–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanekar, S., & Kolsawalla, M.B. (1980). Responsibility of a rape victim in relation to her respectability, attractiveness, and provocativeness. Journal of Social Psychology, 112, 153–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanekar, S., Kolsawalla, M.B., & D'Souza, A. (1981). Attribution of responsibility to a victim of rape. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krulewitz, J.E., & Nash, J.E. (1979). Effects of rape victim resistance, assault outcome, and sex of observer on attributions about rape. Journal of Personality, 47, 557–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krulewitz, J.E., & Payne, E.J. (1978). Attributions about rape: Effects of rapist force, observer sex and sex role attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L'Armand, K., & Pepitone, A. (1982). Judgments of rape: A study of victim-rapist relationship and victim sexual history. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 134–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, C.E., & Feyerherm, W. (1976). A review of recent trends: The effects of crime on the elderly. The Police Chief, February, 48–51.Google Scholar
Public Opinion (1980). The 70's: decade of second thought 2 (6), 19–42.Google Scholar
Scroggs, J.R. (1976). Penalties for rape as a function of victim provocativeness, damage, and resistance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 360–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sealy, A.P., & Wain, C.M. (1980) Person perception and jurors' decisions. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, B., Robbins, M.A., & Johnson, J.A. (1981). Social perception of the rape victim's culpability: The influence of respondents' personal-environmental causal attribution tendencies. Human Relations, 34, 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidner, G., & Griffitt, W. (1983). Rape: A sexual stigma? Journal of Personality, 51, 152–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarmey, A.D. (1982). Eyewitness identification and stereotypes of criminals. In Trankell, A. (Ed), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 205–225). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Yarmey, A.D. (November, 1983). Witnesses' attribution of responsibility toward rape victims and rapists.Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society,San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Yarmey, A.D. (1984). Accuracy and credibility of the elderly witness. Canadian Journal on Aging, 3, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarmey, A.D., Jones, H.P.T., & Rashid, S. (1984). Eyewitness memory of elderly and young adults. In Muller, D. J., Blackman, D.E. & Chapman, A. J. (Eds.), Psychology and law (pp. 215–228). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.Google Scholar