Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:31:24.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age-related Deficits in Intentional Memory for Spatial Location in Small-scale Space: A Meta-Analysis and Methodological Critique*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Pierre Foisy
Pierre Foisy
Affiliation:
Concordia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The goal of this meta-analysis was to provide an estimation of the average effect of aging on intentional memory for spatial location in small-scale space. Findings from 22 studies, which represent the testing of 1,598 subjects, were compared using the following statistics: (a) d (Cohen, 1988), (b) omega2 (Hays, 1963), and (c) Proportion of classified subjects. The meta-analysis suggests that the effect of aging is “large” (e.g., the average d was 0.81), and that it is proportional to the number of dimensions of the array used. However, these conclusions have to be treated with caution because of some methodological limitations of the reviewed literature. In particular, less than half of the studies mentioned (a) control for differences often found between young and elderly adults in visual acuity, and (b) having used a test phase of fixed duration. It is recommended that future research on age-related deficits in spatial memory take into account these confounds.

Résumé

Le but de cette méta-analyse était d'estimer l'effet du vieillissement sur la mémoire intentionnelle de locations dans un espace de petite dimension. Les résultats de 22 études, représentant au total 1 598 sujets, ont été comparés grâce aux indices suivante: (a) d (Cohen, 1988), (b) omega2 (Hays, 1963), et (c) Proportion des sujets classifiés. La méta-analyse suggére que l'effet du vieillissement est «large» (e.g., d moyen de 0.81), et que cet effet est proportionnel au nombre de dimensions de l'espace utilisé. Toutefois, la validité de ces conclusions est incertaine lorsqu'on considére les limites méthodologiques des études recensées. En particulier, moins de la moitié de ces études ont mentionné avoir contrôlé l'effet possible de variables telles que (a) l'acuité visuelle, et (b) la durée de la phase de rappel. Il est proposé que compte de ces variables exogénes.

Keywords

AgingSpatial MemorySmall-scale SpaceIntentional MemoryMeta-analysisVieillissementmémoire spatialeespace de petite dimensionmémoire intentionnelleméta-analyse
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , Automne/Fall 1994 , pp. 353 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bruce, P.R., & Herman, J.F. (1986). Adult age differences in spatial memory: Effects of distinctiveness and repeated experience. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 774–777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canestrari, R.E. (1963). Paced and self-paced learning in young and elderly adults. Journals of Gerontology, 18, 165–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherry, K.E., & Park, D.C. (1989). Age-related differences in three-dimensional spatial memory. Journals of Gerontology, 44, P16–P22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cockburn, J., & Smith, P.T. (1991). The relative influence of intelligence and age on everyday memory. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 46, P31–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cooney, R., & Arbuckle, T.Y. (1990, March). The hippocampal contribution to agerelated decline in memory for spatial location. Paper presented at the Third Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Craik, F.I.M. (1990). Changes in memory with normal aging: A functional view. In Wurtman, R.J. et al. (Eds.), Advances in Neurology, Vol. 51: Alzheimer's disease (pp. 201–205). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Elias, M.F., Robbins, M.A., Schultz, N.R., & Pierce, T.W. (1990). Is blood pressure an important variable in research on aging and neuropsychological test performance? Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 45, P128–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, H.C., Thomas, R.L., & Rodriguez, I.A. (1984). Emotional mood states and memory: Elaborative encoding, semantic processing, and cognitive effort. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 470–482.Google ScholarPubMed
Fozard, J.L. (1990). Vision and hearing in aging. In Birren, J.E. & Schaie, K.W. (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (3rd. ed.) (pp. 166–171). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gaulin, S.J.C., & Hoffman, H.A. (1987). Evolution and development of sex differences in spatial ability. In Betzig, L.L., Mulder, M.B., & Turke, P.W. (Eds.), Human reproductive behavior: A darwinian perspective (pp. 129–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guttman, R. (1984). Performance on eight spatial ability tests as a function of age and education. Educational Gerontology, 10, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, W.L. (1963). Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Hayslip, B., Kennelly, K.J., & Maloy, R.M. (1990). Fatigue, depression, and cognitive performance among aged persons. Experimental Aging Research, 16, 11–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedges, L.V. (1982). Fitting categorical models to effect sizes from a series of experiments. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, L.V., & Becker, B.J. (1986). Statistical methods in the meta-analysis of research on gender differences. In Hyde, J.S. & Linn, M.C. (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 14–50). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hertel, P.T., & Rude, S.S. (1991). Depressive deficits in memory: Focusing attention improves subsequent recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 301–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyde, J.S., & Linn, M.C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivey, C. (1983). The encoding of spatial location in the elderly. Unpublished manuscript, Concordia University.Google Scholar
Kirasic, K.C. (1989). Acquisition and utilization of spatial information by elderly adults: Implications for day-to-day situations. In Poon, L.W., Rubin, D.C., & Wilson, B.A. (Eds.), Everyday cognition and late life (pp. 265–299). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, L. (1991). Memory and aging: Four hypotheses in search of data. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 333–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Light, L.L., & Zelinski, E.M. (1983). Memory for spatial information in young and old adults. Developmental Psychology, 19, 901–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linn, M.C., & Peterson, A.C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maas, L.M., & Gollin, E.S. (1990). Spatial recall in young and elderly adults: Context, cuing and retrieval factors. Paper presented at the Third Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Mandier, J.M., Seegmiller, D., & Day, J. (1977). On the coding of spatial information. Memory and Cognition, 5, 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormack, P.D. (1982). Coding of spatial information by young and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 17, 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishara, B.L., & Riedel, R.G. (1984). Le vieillissement. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1987). Coding of spatial location information: An automatic process? Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 595–605.Google ScholarPubMed
Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1988). Recognition memory of spatial location. Memory & Cognition, 16, 437–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakes, M. (1986). Statistical inference: A commentary for the social and behavioural sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Park, D.C., Cherry, K.E., Smith, A.D., & Lafronza, V.N. (1990). Effects of distinctive context on memory for objects and their locations in young and elderly adults. Psychology and Aging, 5, 250–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, D.C., Puglisi, J.T., & Lutz, R. (1982). Spatial memory in older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 330–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, D.C., Puglisi, T., Sovacool, M. (1983). Memory for pictures, words, and spatial location in older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 582–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perlmutter, M., Adams, C., Berry, J., Kaplan, M., Person, D., & Verdonix, F. (1987). Aging and memory. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 7, 57–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Perlmutter, M., Metzger, R., Nezworski, T., & Miller, K. (1981). Spatial and temporal memory in 20 and 60 year olds. Journal of Gerontology, 1, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezdek, K (1983). Memory for items and their spatial locations by young and elderly adults. Developmental Psychology, 19, 895–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poon, L.W., Krauss, I.K., & Bowles, N.L. (1984). On subject selection in cognitive aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 10, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puglisi, J.T., Park, D.C., Smith, A.D., & Hill, G.W. (1985). Memory for two types of spatial location: Effects of instructions, age, and format. American Journal of Psychology, 98, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analyticprocedures for social research (Rev. ed.) London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, J.S. (1990). Statistical power of psychological research: What have we gained in 20 years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38, 646–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salthouse, T.A. (1985). A theory of cognitive aging. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T.A. (1991). Theoretical perspectives on cognitive aging. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T.A., Kausler, D.H., & Saults, J.S. (1988). Investigation of student status, background variables, and feasibility of standard tasks in cognitive aging research. Psychology and Aging, 3, 29–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sands, L.P., & Meredith, W. (1992). Blood pressure and intellectual functioning in late midlife. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological sciences, 47, P81–P84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharps, M.J., & Gollin, E.S. (1987). Memory for objects locations in young and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 336–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddell, K.J., & Rogoff, B. (1981). Effect of contextual organization on spatial memory of middle-aged and older women. Developmental Psychology, 17, 878–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddell, K.J., & Rogoff, B. (1987). Contextual organization and intentionality in adults' spatial memory. Developmental Psychology, 23, 514–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, R.L., Boatwright, L.K., & Schleser, R. (1984). The link between memory performance, self-assessment, and affective status. Experimental Aging Research, 10, 197–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willis, S.L., & Schaie, K.W. (1988). Gender differences in spatial ability in old age: Longitudinal and intervention findings. Sex Roles, 18, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelinski, E.M., & Light, L.L. (1988). Young and older adults' use of context in spatial memory. Psychology and Aging, 3, 99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar