Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:01:33.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accuracy and Credibility of the Elderly Witness1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

A. Daniel Yarmey
A. Daniel Yarmey
Affiliation:
University of Guelph
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Competency of witnesses depends upon the accuracy of their memory and their credibility. This paper addresses both of these factors with respect to the elderly. First, a review of the accuracy of the elderly eyewitness in recall and identification of a criminal suspect relative to that of young adults is presented. Secondly, the results of a study testing the perceptions of the legal community and the general public toward the elderly witness are given. And thirdly, the attitudes of the elderly toward police officers, trial judges, crown attorneys, and defense lawyers are discussed. Young adults were found to be seven to 20 per cent more accurate on the average than elderly subjects in recall for crime-related events and in the identification of a suspect. However, results also showed that some elderly subjects are equally as accurate as young adults in the visual identification of a suspect. Police officers, lawyers, probation officers, the general public, and elderly subjects rated the elderly witness relatively high in understandability, activity, potency, and evaluation. These judgements suggest that the credibility of the elderly witness is favorable. Finally, the study showed that elderly subjects perceive trial judges, prosecutors, and defense lawyers positively, and they are particularly supportive of the police.

Résumé

L'habilité à témoigner repose sur la fidélité de la mémoire et sur la crédibilité du témoignage. Dans la présente communication, nous examinons ces deux facteurs chez les témoins âgés. Nous comparons, premièrement, l'aptitude des témoins oculaires âgés au rappel et à l'identification des suspects avec celle des adultes jeunes. Deuxièmement, nous présentons les résultats d'une étude portant sur la manière dont les témoins âgés sont perçus par les professionnels de la justice et le public en général. Troisièmement, nous considérons l'attitude des personnes âgés à l'égard des agents de police, des juges, des avocats de la demand et de la défense. Les résultats indiquent que l'aptitude des jeunes au rappel des événements entourant un crime ainsi qu'à l'identification des suspects est supérieure à celle des témoins âgés dans la proporation de 20 pour cent. Ces résultats indiquent cependant que certains témoins âgés sont aussi fidèles que les jeunes en ce qui concerne l'identification visuelle des suspects. Les agents de police, avocats, délégués à la liberté surveillée, le public en général ainsi que les personnes âgées elle-mêmes ont une opinion relativement bonne de la compréhension, de l'activité, de la capacité et du jugement des témoins âgés. Ces résultats permettent de croire que la crédibilité des témoins âgés est favorable. Enfin, l'étude montre que les sujets âgés ont une attitude favorable à l'égard des juges et des avocats tant de la demande que de la défense, et qu'ils sont particulièrement bien disposés à l'égard de la police.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 1984 , pp. 79 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brigham, J.C., & Williamson, N.L. (1979). Crossracial recognition and age: When you're over 60, do they still “all look alike?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 218–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F.I.M. (1977). Age differences in human memory. In Birren, J.E. & Schaie, K.W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 384–420). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Erber, J.T. (1974). Age differences in recognition memory. Journal of Gerontology, 29, 177–181.Google Scholar
Ferris, S.H., Crook, T., Clark, E., McCarthy, M. & Rae, D. (1980). Facial recognition memory deficits in normal aging and senile dementia. Journal of Gerontology, 35, 707–714.Google Scholar
Miller, G.R., & Burgoon, J.K. (1982). Factors affecting assessments of witness credibility. In Kerr, N.L. & Bray, R.M. (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 169–194). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A.D., & Winograd, E. (1978). Adult age differences in remembering faces. Developmental Psychology, 14, 443–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundeen, R.A., & Mathieu, J.T. (1976). The urban elderly: Environments of fear. In Goldsmith, J. & Goldsmith, S.S. (Eds.), Crime and the elderly (pp. 51–66). Toronto: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Thompson, L.W. (1980). Testing and mnemonic strategies. In Poon, L.W., Fozard, J.L., Cermak, L.S., Arenberg, D., & Thompson, L.W. (Eds.), New directions in memory and aging: Proceedings of the George A. Talland Memorial Conference (pp. 367–377). Hills-dale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Uematsu, T. (1982). Reliability of eyewitness testimony: Results of experimental studies and their practical applications. In Trankell, A. (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 151–163). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Walsh, D.A. (1975). Age differences in learning and memory. In Woodruff, D.S. & Birren, J.E. (Eds.), Aging: Scientific perspectives and social issues (pp. 125–151). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Yarmey, A.D. (1982). Eyewitness identification and stereotypes of criminals. In Trankell, A. (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 205–255). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Yarmey, A.D. (1983). Eyewitness identification: Psychological aspects. In Kadish, S.H. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of crime and justice (pp. 749–755). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Yarmey, A.D. (1984). Age as a factor in eyewitness memory. In Wells, G.L. & Loftus, E.F. (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 142–154). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yarmey, A.D., & Jones, H.P.T. (1982). Police awareness of the fallibility of eyewitness identification. Canadian Police College Journal, 6, 113–124.Google Scholar
Yarmey, A.D., & Jones, H.P.T. (1983). Is the psychology of eyewitness identification a matter of common sense? In Lloyd-Bostock, S. & Clifford, B.R. (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence: Recent psychological research and new perspectives (pp. 13–40). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
Yarmey, A.D., & Jones, H.P.T., & Rashid, S. (1984). Eyewitness memory of elderly and young adults. In Muller, D.J., Blackman, D.E., & Chapman, A.J. (Eds.), Psychology and law (pp. 215–228). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
Yarmey, A.D., & Kent, J. (1980). Eyewitness identification by elderly and young adults. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 359–371.Google Scholar
Yarmey, A.D., & Rashid, S. (1983). Perceptions of the public and legal professionals toward police officers. Canadian Police College Journal, 7, 89–95.Google Scholar