Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T02:33:44.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward an Ever Looser Union? Investigating Diverging Trends in Public Opinion in Three Divided Societies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2023

Dieter Stiers Open the ORCID record for Dieter Stiers [Opens in a new window]  and
Marc Hooghe
Dieter Stiers*
Affiliation:
Centre for Political Science Research, Parkstraat 45 box 3602, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Marc Hooghe
Affiliation:
Centre for Political Science Research, Parkstraat 45 box 3602, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
*
Corresponding author: Dieter Stiers; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The stability of divided societies is an important and recurring concern in political science research. It has been suggested that distinctive socialization processes in the different regions of divided societies will lead to diverging trends in public opinion. Therefore, we investigate trends in public opinion on key political issues and attitudes in three divided societies: Canada (Quebec), the United Kingdom (Scotland) and Spain (Catalonia). Using over two decades of survey data, we show that these distinct communities indeed have a particular ideological profile but also that there is no indication these differences become larger over time. In other words, we do not observe any evidence for an increasing lack of public opinion coherence in these divided societies. We conclude with some observations on why divergence could not be observed at the level of public opinion but might still be present at the level of party elites.

Résumé

Résumé

La stabilité des sociétés divisées est une préoccupation importante et récurrente dans la recherche en sciences politiques. Il a été suggéré que les processus de socialisation distincts dans les différentes régions des sociétés divisées conduiraient à des tendances divergentes dans l'opinion publique. C'est pourquoi nous étudions les tendances de l'opinion publique sur des questions et des attitudes politiques clés dans trois sociétés divisées : le Canada (Québec), le Royaume-Uni (Écosse) et l'Espagne (Catalogne).

En utilisant plus de deux décennies de données d'enquête, nous montrons que ces communautés distinctes ont en effet un profil idéologique particulier, mais que rien n'indique que ces différences s'accentuent avec le temps. À cet égard, nous n'observons aucune donnée probante d'un manque croissant de cohérence de l'opinion publique dans ces sociétés divisées. Nous concluons par quelques observations sur les raisons pour lesquelles la divergence n'a pu être observée au niveau de l'opinion publique, mais pourrait encore être présente au niveau des élites des partis.

Keywords

divided societiespublic opinionCanadaUnited KingdomSpainSociétés diviséesopinion publiqueCanadaRoyaume-UniEspagne
Type
Research Article/Étude originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , September 2023 , pp. 681 - 697
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Canadian Political Science Association (l’Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboultaif, Eduardo. 2019. Power Sharing in Lebanon. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrighi, Jean-Thomas. 2019. “‘The People, Year Zero’: Secessionism and Citizenship in Scotland and Catalonia.” Ethnopolitics 18 (3): 278–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arzheimer, Kai, Evans, Jocelyn and Lewis-Beck, Michael, eds. 2017. The Sage Handbook of Electoral Behaviour. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bélanger, Éric, Nadeau, Richard, Henderson, Ailsa and Hepburn, Eve. 2018. The National Question and Electoral Politics in Quebec and Scotland. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 2002. “A New Look at Federalism: The Import of Institutions.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Nadeau, Richard and Nevitte, Neil. 2000. Canadian Election Study, 2000. Institute for Social Research (ISR), York University.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Everitt, Joanna, Fournier, Patrick, Gidengil, Elisabeth and Nevitte, Neil. 2004. Canadian Election Study, 2004. Institute for Social Research (ISR), York University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André, Everitt, Joanna, Fournier, Patrick, Gidengil, Elisabeth and Nevitte, Neil. 2006. Canadian Election Study, 2004-2006. Institute for Social Research (ISR), York University.Google Scholar
Blanchet, Alexandre and Medeiros, Mike. 2019. “The Secessionist Spectre: The Influence of Authoritarianism, Nativism and Populism on Support for Quebec Independence.” Nations and Nationalism 25 (3): 803–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaards, Matthijs. 2014. Democracy and Social Peace in Divided Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaards, Matthijs. 2019. “Consociationalism and Centripetalism: Friends or Foes?” Swiss Political Science Review 25 (4): 519–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Anna. 2006. “La llengua al Nou Estatut d'Autonomia de Catalunya.” Revista d'estudis autonòmics i federals 3: 259–94.Google Scholar
Bridgman, Aengus, Nadeau, Richard and Stolle, Dietlind. 2022. “A Distinct Society? Understanding Social Distrust in Quebec.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 107–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brie, Evelyne and Mathieu, Félix. 2021. Un pays divisé: Identité, fédéralisme et regionalisme au Canada. Quebec: Presses de l'Université Laval.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhry, Sujit, ed. 2008a. Constitutional Design for Divided Societies: Integration or Accommodation? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhry, Sujit. 2008b. “Bridging Comparative Politics and Comparative Constitutional Law: Constitutional Design in Divided Societies.” In Constitutional Design for Divided Societies: Integration or Accommodation? ed. Choudhry, S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell. 2008. “The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarization, Its Measurement, and Its Consequences.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (7): 899–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidov, Eldad and Semyonov, Moshe. 2017. “Attitudes toward Immigrants in European Societies.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 58 (5): 359–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Catherine, Hakhverdian, Armèn and Lancee, Bram. 2013. “The Dynamics of Voters’ Left/Right Identification: The Role of Economic and Cultural Attitudes.” Political Science Research and Methods 1 (2): 223–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, Claire, Verhaegen, Soetkin and Van Ingelgom, Virginie. 2021. “Support for Regionalization in Federal Belgium: The Role of Political Socialization.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 51 (1): 54–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erk, Jan and Anderson, Lawrence. 2009. “The Paradox of Federalism: Does Self-Rule Accommodate or Exacerbate Ethnic Divisions?” Regional & Federal Studies 19 (2): 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESS (European Social Survey). 2020. Cumulative File, ESS 1–9. Data file edition 1.0. NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC. doi:10.21338/NSD-ESS-CUMULATIVE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faniel, Jean, Istasse, Cédric, Lefebve, Vincent and Sägesser, Caroline. 2021. “La Belgique, un État fédéral singulier.” Courrier Hebdomadaire du CRISP, no. 2500.Google Scholar
Fournier, Patrick, Cutler, Fred, Soroka, Stuart and Stolle, Deitland. 2011. Canadian Election Study, 2011. Institute for Social Research (ISR), York University.Google Scholar
Fournier, Patrick, Cutler, Fred, Soroka, Stuart and Stolle, Deitland. 2015. Canadian Election Study, 2015. Institute for Social Research (ISR), York University.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark, Mackie, Thomas and Valen, Henry, eds. 1992. Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gagnon, Alain-G. 2021. “Multinational Federalism: Challenges, Shortcomings and Promises.” Regional & Federal Studies 31 (1): 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Everitt, Joanna, Fournier, Patrick and Nevitte, Neil. 2008. Canadian Election Study, 2008. Institute for Social Research (ISR), York University.Google Scholar
Goubin, Silke and Hooghe, Marc. 2022. “Do Welfare Concerns Drive Electoral Support for the Populist Radical Right? Acta Politica 57 (2): 431–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinjoan, Marc. 2022. “Who Backs Separation? An Empirical Assessment of the Objective and Subjective Markers of Identity in Support for Secession in Catalonia.” Publius. The Journal of Federalism 52 (2): 329–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinjoan, Marc and Rodon, Toni. 2014. “Beyond Identities: Political Determinants of Support for Decentralization in Contemporary Spain.” Regional & Federal Studies 24 (1): 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Ailsa. 2004. “Regional Political Cultures in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 595–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Ailsa. 2007. Hierarchies of Belonging: National Identity and Political Culture in Scotland and Quebec. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Ailsa, Johns, Robert, Larner, Jac and Carman, Christopher. 2022. The Referendum That Changed a Nation: Scottish Voting Behaviour, 2014–2019. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks, Gary. 2018. “Cleavage Theory Meets Europe's Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (1): 109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Marc and Meeusen, Cecil. 2013. “Is Same-Sex Marriage Legislation Related to Attitudes toward Homosexuality? Trends in Tolerance of Homosexuality in European Countries between 2002 and 2010.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 10 (4): 258–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Marc and Stiers, Dieter. 2022. “A Tale of Two Regions: An Analysis of Two Decades of Belgian Public Opinion.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 52 (4): 655–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huyse, Luc. 1981. “Political Conflict in Bicultural Belgium?” In Conflict and Coexistence in Belgium: The Dynamics of a Culturally Divided Society, ed. Lijphart, Arend. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Huysseune, Michel. 2006. Modernity and Secessionism: The Social Sciences and the Political Discourse of the Lega Nord in Italy. New York: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakala, Michaelina, Kuzu, Durukan and Qvortrup, Matt, eds. 2018. Consociationalism and Power-Sharing in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jæger, Mads. 2008. “Does Left-Right Orientation Have a Causal Effect on Support for Redistribution?” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20 (3): 363–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Michael, ed. 2017. Debating Scotland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, Soeren and Alber, Elisabeth. 2020. “Federalism as a Tool of Conflict Resolution.” Ethnopolitics 19 (4): 329–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Brighid. 2019. Power-Sharing and Consociational Theory. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Dolezal, Martin, Helbling, Marc, Höglinger, Dominic, Hutter, Swen and Wüest, Bruno. 2012. Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laponce, Jean. 2010. Le référendum de souveraineté: Comparaisons, critiques et commentaires. Quebec: Presses de l'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Lecours, André. 2021. Nationalism, Secessionism, and Autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael, Nadeau, Richard and Foucault, Martial. 2013. “The Compleat Economic Voter: New Theory and British Evidence.” British Journal of Political Science 43 (2): 241–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupton, Robert, Enders, Adam and Jacoby, William. 2017. “Ideology and Core Values.” In The Sage Handbook of Electoral Behaviour, ed. Arzheimer, Kai, Evans, Jocelyn and Lewis-Beck, Michael. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lustick, Ian. 1979. “Stability in Deeply Divided Societies.” World Politics 31 (3): 325–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustick, Ian, Miodownik, Dan and Eidelson, Roy. 2004. “Secessionism in Multicultural States: Does Sharing Power Prevent or Encourage It?” American Political Science Review 98 (2): 209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massetti, Emanuele. 2018. “Left-Wing Regionalist Populism in the ‘Celtic’ Peripheries: Plaid Cymru and the Scottish National Party's Anti-austerity Challenge against the British Elites.” Comparative European Politics 16 (6): 937–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massetti, Emanuele and Schakel, Arjan. 2016. “Between Autonomy and Secession: Decentralization and Regionalist Party Ideological Radicalism.” Party Politics 22 (1): 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, Fraser. 2020. “Devolution, ‘New Politics’ and Election Pledge Fulfilment in Scotland, 1999–2011.” British Politics 15: 251–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medeiros, Mike. 2019. “National Frenemies: Linguistic Intergroup Attitudes in Canada.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 42 (16): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medeiros, Mike, Gauvin, Jean-Philippe and Chhim, Chris. 2022. “Unified Voters in a Divided Society: Ideology and Regionalism in Belgium.” Regional & Federal Studies 32 (1): 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Richard and Blais, André. 1993. “Explaining Election Outcomes in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 26 (4): 775–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, Martin, Pierre and Blais, André. 1999. “Attitude towards Risk-Taking and Individual Choice in the Quebec Referendum on Sovereignty.” British Journal of Political Science 29 (3): 529–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okolikj, Martin, Goubin, Silke, Stiers, Dieter and Hooghe, Marc. Forthcoming. “Trust in Political Parties and Ideological Proximity Voting in Europe.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties.Google Scholar
Pattie, Charles, Denver, David, Mitchell, James and Bochel, Hugh. 1999. “Partisanship, National Identity and Constitutional Preferences: An Exploration of Voting in the Scottish Devolution Referendum of 1997.” Electoral Studies 18 (3): 305–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poitras, Dave and Dufour, Frédérick Guillaume. 2022. “Concilier les approches sociohistoriques et les approches ethnographiques dans l’étude du nationalisme: Une analyse de cas de la résonnance de la bataille des Éperons d'or en Flandre.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 517–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Punset Blanco, Ramón and Alas, Leopoldo Tolivar, eds. 2020. España: El federalismo necesario. Madrid: Reus.Google Scholar
Sanjaume-Calvet, Marc. 2021. “Plebiscitarianism Revisited: A Typology of Independence Referendums.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 54 (3): 593–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, Laura B., Harell, Allisson, Rubenson, Daniel and Loewen, Peter John. 2019. Canadian Election Study, 2019, Phone Survey. Canadian Opinion Research Archive.Google Scholar
Swenden, Wilfried and Jans, Maarten. 2006. “‘Will It Stay or Will It Go?’ Federalism and the Sustainability of Belgium.” West European Politics 29 (5): 877–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trzciński, Krzysztof. 2022. “Consociationalism Meets Centripetalism: Hybrid Power-Sharing.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 28 (3): 313–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Stiers and Hooghe supplementary material

Appendices A-H

Download Stiers and Hooghe supplementary material(File)
File 1.7 MB