Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:07:39.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taking the Field: 50 Years of Indigenous Politics in the CJPS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2017

Kiera L. Ladner
Kiera L. Ladner*
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba
*
Department of Political Studies, 524 FA Building, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T2N2, email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reviews the place of Indigenous politics in the last 50 years of Canadian political science. Focusing on the CJPS, it looks at broad themes and clusters in the literature over time, while also trying to explain how the roots of the discipline continue to impact the development of political science in Canada and thus CJPS. I argue that while at least 43 articles have dealt with Indigenous politics (solely or as a significant focus) and at least 18 have had some significant discussion thereof, there nonetheless remains a disconnect between Indigenous politics and the discipline. This disconnect exists because of the methodological and epistemological foundations of the discipline which have resulted in a focus limited to the Westphalian state. While the disconnect between Indigenous politics and the discipline has waned considerably (43 of 61 articles have been published since 2000) as there has been an awakening of sorts, a disconnect nevertheless still exists.

Résumé

Cet article examine la place de la politique autochtone au cours des 50 dernières années de science politique canadienne. En se concentrant sur la CJPS/RCSP, il se penche sur les grands thèmes et regroupements dans la documentation au fil du temps, tout en essayant également d'expliquer comment les fondements de la discipline continuent d'avoir une incidence sur le développement de la science politique au Canada, et partant, sur la CJPS/RCSP. J'avance que tandis qu'au moins 43 articles ont traité de la politique autochtone (exclusivement ou en grande partie) et au moins 18 ont fait l'objet d'une large discussion, il subsiste néanmoins un décalage entre la politique autochtone et la discipline. Ce décalage existe en raison des fondements méthodologiques et épistémologiques de la discipline qui se sont traduits par un accent limité à l’État westphalien. Bien que le décalage entre la politique autochtone et la discipline se soit nettement réduit (43 articles sur 61 ont été publiés depuis l'an 2000), car un éveil s'est en quelque sorte produit, un écart continue d'exister.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 163 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank Sheryl Lightfoot, Meagan Cloutier, Graham White and the CJPS reviewers for their helpful comments. I also wish to acknowledge the support of the Canada Research Chairs programme.

References

Alcantara, Christopher. 2007. “Explaining Aboriginal Treaty Negotiation Outcomes in Canada: The Case of the Inuit and the Innu in Labrador.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 185–207.Google Scholar
Alcantara, Christopher and Nelles, Jen. 2009. “Claiming the City: Co-operation and Making the Deal in Urban Comprehensive Land Claims Negotiations in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 705–27.Google Scholar
Alcantara, Christopher and Davidson, Adrienne. 2015. “Negotiating Aboriginal Self-Government Agreements in Canada: An Analysis of the Inuvialuit Experience.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 553–75.Google Scholar
Andersen, Chris. 2014. Metis: Race, Recognition, and the Struggle for Indigenous Peoplehood. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Arneil, Barbara. 1996. John Locke and America: The Defense of English Colonialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boldt, Menno and Long, Anthony J.. 1984. “Tribal Traditions and European-Western Political Ideologies: The Dilemma of Canada's Native Indians.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 17 (3): 537–53.Google Scholar
Brandon, William. 1986. New Worlds for Old: Reports from the New World and Their Effect on the Development of Social Thought in Europe: 1500–1800. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Brock, Kathy L. 1995. “Native Peoples on the Road to Self-Government.” In Introductory Readings in Canadian Government and Politics, ed. Krause, Robert M. and Wagenberg, R. H.. 2nd ed. Toronto: Copp Clark.Google Scholar
Brodie, Ian and Nevitte, Neil. “Evaluating the Citizens’ Constitution Theory.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 26 (2): 235–59.Google Scholar
Bruyneel, Kevin. 2012. “Political Science and the Study of Indigenous Politics.” In Oxford Handbook of Indigenous People's Politics, ed. Lucero, José Antonio, Turner, Dale and VanCott, Donna Lee. Oxford Handbooks Online. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2061662.Google Scholar
Cairns, Alan C. 1991. Disruptions: Constitutional Struggles from the Charter to Meech Lake, ed. Williams, Douglas E.. Toronto: Mclelland & Stewart.Google Scholar
Cassidy, Frank. 1990. “Aboriginal Governments in Canada: An Emerging Field of Study.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 23 (1): 73–99.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Glen, 2014. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cochrane, Christopher, Blidook, Kelly and Dyck, Rand. 2016. Canadian Politics: Critical Approaches. Toronto: Nelson.Google Scholar
De Costa, Ravi. 2006. “Identity, Authority, and the Moral Worlds of Indigenous Petitions.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 48 (3): 669–98.Google Scholar
Dickerson, Mark O. and Flanagan, Thomas. 1986. An Introduction to Government and Politics: A Conceptual Approach. Toronto: Methuen.Google Scholar
Dubois, Janique and Saunders, Kelly. 2013. “‘Just Do It!’: Carving Out a Space for the Métis in Canadian Federalism.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 187–214.Google Scholar
Dyck, Rand. 1996. Canadian Politics: Critical Approaches, 2nd ed. Scarborough: Nelson.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Thomas. 1978. “Political Theory of the Red River Resistance: The Declaration of December 8, 1869.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 11 (1): 153–64.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Thomas. 1985 “The Sovereignty and Nationhood of Canadian Indians: A Comment on Boldt and Long.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 18 (2): 367–74.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Thomas. 1989. “The Agricultural Argument and Original Appropriation: Indian Lands and Political Philosophy.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 22 (3): 589–602.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Thomas. 1998. “Bands, Tribes or Nations?” In Pimohtewin: A Native Studies e-Journal, www.ualberta.ca/~nativest/pim/flanagan.html.Google Scholar
Gibbins, Roger. 1990. Conflict and Unity: An Introduction to Canadian Political Life. Scarborough: Nelson.Google Scholar
Giraud, M. 1937. “A Note on the Half-Breed Problem in Manitoba.” The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 3: 541–49.Google Scholar
Green, Joyce A. 2000. “The Difference Debate: Reducing Rights to Cultural Flavours.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 33 (1): 133–44.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert and Jackson, Doreen. 2017. Canadian Government and Politics in Transition. 6th ed. Scarborough: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Jenness, Diamond. 1954. “Canada's Indians Yesterday. What of Today?” The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 20: 95–100.Google Scholar
Ladner, Kiera L. 2001. “When Buffalo Speaks: Creating an Alternative Understanding of Traditional Blackfoot Governance.” Doctoral dissertation. Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Ladner, Kiera L. 2003a. “Rethinking Aboriginal Governance.” In Reinventing Canada: Politics of the 21st Century, ed. Brodie, Janine and Trimble, Linda. Toronto: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ladner, Kiera L. 2003b. “Governing within an Ecological Context: Creating an AlterNative Understanding of Blackfoot Governance.” Studies in Political Economy 70: 125–52.Google Scholar
LaSelva, Samuel V. 1993a. “Federalism as a Way of Life: Reflections on the Canadian Experiment.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 26 (2): 219–34.Google Scholar
LaSelva, Samuel V. 1993b. “Re-Imagining Confederation: Moving beyond the Trudeau-Lévesque Debate.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 26 (4): 699–720.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, Sheryl. 2016. Global Indigenous Politics: A Subtle Revolution. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Long., J. Anthony. 1990. “Political Revitalization in Canadian Native Indian Communities.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 23 (4): 751–73.Google Scholar
Lugosi, Nicole V. T. 2011. ““Truth-telling” and Legal Discourse: A Critical Analysis of the Neil Stonechild Inquiry.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 299–315.Google Scholar
MacInnes, T.R.L. 1946. “History of Indian Administration in Canada.” The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 12: 387–94.Google Scholar
Malcolmson, Patrick, Myers, Richard, Baier, Gerald and Bateman, Tom. 2016. The Canadian Regime: An Introduction to Parliamentary Government in Canada. 6th ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Papillon, Martin. 2014. “The Rise (and Fall?) of Aboriginal Self-Government.” In Canadian Politics, ed. Bickerton, James and Gagnon, Alain-G.. 6th ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, David B. and Hudson, Graham. 2012 “The Genocide Question and Indian Residential Schools in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 45 (2):427–49.Google Scholar
Russell, Peter. 1991. “Can Canadians Become a Sovereign People?” Canadian Journal of Political Science 24 (4): 691–709.Google Scholar
Russell, Peter. 2005. Recognizing Aboriginal Title: The Mabo Case and Indigenous Resistance to English-Settler Colonialism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Rynard, Paul. 2000. “‘Welcome In, but Check Your Rights at the Door’: The James Bay and Nisga'a Agreements in Canada.” Canadian Journal and Political Science 33 (2): 211–43.Google Scholar
R v Marshall (no 1 and 2). 1999. 3 S.C.R. 456, 533.Google Scholar
Sanders, Will. 2015. “Indigenous Politics in the Australian Journal of Political Science .” Australian Journal of Political Science 50: 679–94.Google Scholar
Scholtz, Christa. 2009. “The Influence of Judicial Uncertainty on Executive Support for Negotiation in Canadian Land Claims Policy.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 417–42.Google Scholar
Smith, Miriam. 2009. “Diversity and Canadian Political Development: Presidential Address to the Canadian Political Science Association, Ottawa, May 27, 2009.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 831–54.Google Scholar
Torrance, Judy. 1977. “The Response of Canadian Governments to Violence.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 10 (3): 473–96.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in the Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Dale. 2006. This is Not a Peace Pipe: Towards a Critical Indigenous Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Voth, Daniel. 2016. “Her Majesty's Justice Be Done: Métis Legal Mobilization and the Pitfalls to Indigenous Political Movement Building.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 243–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Stephen, Atkinson, Michael M., Berdahl, Loleen and McGrane, David. 2015. “Public Policies toward Aboriginal Peoples: Attitudinal Obstacles and Uphill Battles.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 281–304.Google Scholar
Whittington, Michael S. and Williams, Glen, eds. 1995. Canadian Politics in the 1990s. Scarborough: Nelson.Google Scholar