Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:43:30.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Studying Public Policy”: Historical Institutionalism and the Comparative Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2017

Gerard W. Boychuk
Gerard W. Boychuk*
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that Simeon's insistence on the value of explicit comparison within individual studies of public policy needs to remain central even in historical institutionalist approaches which “take time seriously” and focus on causal mechanisms—a methodological injunction sometimes seen to augur in favour of single-case and single-outcome studies. However, if Simeon's suggested approach is to reflect the major advances that have occurred since he wrote, it will require more fully and more explicitly combining the power of the comparative method with the powerful insights generated by a logic of intertemporal causal mechanisms unfolding over time.

Résumé

Cet article fait valoir que l'insistance de Simeon sur la valeur de la comparaison explicite parmi les études ponctuelles des politiques publiques doit demeurer centrale même dans les approches institutionnalistes historiques qui « prennent le temps au sérieux » et se concentrent sur des mécanismes causals–une injonction méthodologique qui semble, selon certains, augurer en faveur des études de cas. Toutefois, si l'approche suggérée par Simeon doit refléter les avancées majeures qui sont survenues depuis qu'il a rédigé ses lignes, il y aura lieu de conjuguer pleinement et explicitement la puissance de la méthode comparative et les perspectives puissantes générées par une logique des mécanismes causals intertemporels qui évoluent au fil des ans.

Type
Simeon's “Studying Public Policy” 40 years on – A Symposium
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 743 - 761
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Graham. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Béland, Daniel and Hacker, Jacob S.. 2004. “Ideas, Private Institutions and American Welfare State ‘Exceptionalism’: The Case of Health and Old-Age Insurance, 1915–1965.” International Journal of Social Welfare 13: 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boothe, Katherine. 2015. Ideas and the Pace of Change: National Pharmaceutical Insurance in Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boychuk, Gerard. 1998. Patchworks of Purpose: The Development of Provincial Social Assistance Regimes in Canada. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boychuk, Gerard. 2008. National Health Insurance in the United States and Canada: Race, Territory and the Roots of Difference. Washingon DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Do Vale, Hélder Ferriera. 2015. “Temporality, Causality, and Trajectories: Comparative Historical Analysis in Social and Political Sciences.” Revista Debates 9 (1): 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fioretos, Orfeo, Falleti, Tulia G. and Sheingate, Adam. 2016. “Historical Institutionalism in Political Science.” In Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, ed. Fioretos, Orfeo, Falleti, Tulia G. and Sheingate, Adam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haddow, Rodney. 2015. Comparing Quebec and Ontario: Political Economy and Public Policy at the Turn of the Millennium. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2003. “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2016. “Politics as a Process Structured in Space and Time.” In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, ed. Orfeo Firoetos, Tulia G. Falleti and Adam Sheingate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Freda. 1972. Canada and Immigration: Public Policy and Public Concern. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael. 2009. “Process Sequencing Policy Dynamics: Beyond Homeostasis and Path Dependency.” Journal of Public Policy 29 (3): 241–62.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Cashore, Benjamin. 2009. “The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 11 (1): 33–46.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Rayner, Jeremy. 2006. “Understanding the Historical Turn in the Policy Sciences: A Critique of Stochastic, Narrative, Path Dependency and Process-Sequencing Models of Policy-Making over Time.” Policy Sciences 39: 1–18.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Alan M. and Weaver, R. Kent. 2015. “When Policies Undo Themselves: Self-Undermining Feedback as a Source of Policy Change.” Governance 28 (4): 441–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. 2001. “Causal Inference in Historical Institutional Analysis: A Specification of Periodization Strategies.” Comparative Political Studies 34 (9): 1011–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen. 2015. “Preface.” In Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, ed. Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 2004. “Comparative Historical Analysis: Achievements and Agendas.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maioni, Antonia. 1998. Parting at the Crossroads: The Emergence of Health Insurance in the United States and Canada. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Noël, Alain. 2014. “Studying Your Own Country: Social Scientific Knowledge for Our Times and Places.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 647–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olive, Andrea. 2014. Land, Stewardship and Legitimacy: Endangered Species Policy in Canada and the United States. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul and Skocpol, Theda. 2002. “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V.. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Prasad, Monica. 2006. Politics of the the Free Market: The Rise of Neoliberal Economic Policies in Britain, France, Germany and the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rayner, Jeremy. 2009. “Understanding Policy Change as a Historical Problem.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 11 (1): 83–96.Google Scholar
Sanders, Elizabeth. 2008. “Historical Institutionalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, ed. Rhodes, R.A.W., Binder, Sarah A. and Rockman, Bert A.. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheingate, Adam. 2001. The Rise of the Agricultural Welfare State: Institutions and Interest Group Power in the the United States, France, and Japan. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simeon, Richard. 1976. “Studying Public Policy.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 9 (4): 549–80.Google Scholar
Smith, Miriam. 2005. “Institutionalism in the Study of Canadian Politics: The English Canadian Tradition.” In New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis, ed. Lecours, André. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2015. “Epilogue–Comparative-Historical Analysis: Past, Present, Future.” In Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, ed. Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swenson, Peter. 2002. Capitalists Against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen and Mahoney, James. 2015. “Comparative-Historical Analysis in Contemporary Political Science.” In Advances in Comparative- Historical Analysis, ed. Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen and Steinmo, Sven. 1992. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” In Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, ed. Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen and Longstreth, Frank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turgeon, Luc. 2014. “Introduction.” In Comparing Canada: Methods and Perspectives on Canadian Politics, ed. Turgeon, Luc, Papillon, Martin, Wallner, Jennifer and White, Stephen. Vancouver: UBC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallely, Richard, Mettler, Suzanne and Lieberman, Robert, eds. 2016. Oxford Handbook of American Political Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallner, Jennifer. 2014. Learning to School: Federalism and Public Schooling in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
White, Linda. 2016. “How Does Culture Change Occur? Institutional and Ideational Mechanisms.” Paper presented at the American-British-Canadian Political Development Workshop, Toronto.Google Scholar