Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:57:23.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State and Civil Society: The Limits of a Royal Commission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Philip Resnick
Philip Resnick
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study assesses the contribution of five of the research studies done for the Macdonald Royal Commission and of the opening chapter of the Commission Report to our understanding of the state. It examines the use of the term state, the economic and social functions that the latter is seen to perform, and the light that these studies may shed on such thorny topics as authority, legitimacy and citizenship in the late twentieth century. It concludes that, despite individual contributions of note, there are real limitations to what this Commission and its research associates tell us about the state.

Résumé

Cet article examine ce que cinq des études commandées par la Commission Macdonald et le premier chapitre du Rapport lui-même nous enseignent sur la nature de l'État. L'auteur discute de la définition de l'État, de ses fonctions économiques et sociales, et de la façon avec laquelle ces études abordent les thèmes de l'autorité, de la légitimité, et de la citoyenneté en cette fin du 20e siècle. L'article conclut que certaines de ces études ont une valeur réelle, mais que l'apport global de ces volumes à notre compréhension de l'État moderne reste fort limité.

Type
Field Analysis/Orientations de la Science Politique
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 379 - 401
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cairns, Alan and Williams, Cynthia, “Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada: An Overview,” in Cairns, Alan and Williams, Cynthia (eds.), Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada, Royal Commission Research Studies, Vol. 33 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press for Supply and Services Canada, 1985), 2.Google Scholar

2 Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada Report, Vol. 1 (Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services, 1985), 11.Google Scholar

3 Ibid., 12.

4 Ibid., 65.

5 Thus, the term “state” appears on pages 7, 11,26-27,31, 39 of vol. 1 of the Report and the term “government” on pages 24-25, 28, 35, 38.

6 Badie, Bertrand and Birnbaum, Pierre, The Sociology of the State (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1983)Google Scholar, Part 3.

7 Mann, Thomas, Reflections of a Non-Political Man (New York: Frederick Ungar, 1983), 178.Google Scholar

8 Compare Nicolet, Claude, L'ldlée républicaine en France (1789-1924) (Paris: Gallimard, 1982).Google Scholar

9 Royal Commission Report, Vol. 1, 41, 43, 65.Google Scholar

10 Ibid., 65.

11 Cairns, Alan, “The Embedded State: State-Society Relations in Canada,” in Banting, Keith (ed.), State and Society: Canada in Comparative Perspective, Royal Commission Research Studies, Vol. 31 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press for Supply and Services Canada, 1986), 55.Google Scholar

12 Ibid., 57.

13 Ibid., 68, 71, 82.

14 Constant, Benjamin, De la liberté des anciens comparée à ceile des modernes in Cours de politique constitutionnelle (Paris: Guillaumin, 1872), Vol. 2, 539-60.Google Scholar

15 Royal Commision Report, Vol. 1, 20.Google Scholar

16 Cairns, “The Embedded State,” 83.

17 Crozier, Michael, Huntington, Samuel P., and Watanaki, Joji, The Crisis of Democracy (The Trilateral Commission: New York University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

18 Cairns and Williams, “Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada,” 44.

19 The same process is at work in the federalism section of the research studies with Daniel Latouche's passionately nationalist essay (vol. 70), encompassed within a sea of more conventional federalist discourse.

20 Doern, Bruce, “The Politics of Canadian Economic Policy: An Overview,” in Doern, Bruce (ed.), The Politics of Economic Policy, Royal Commission Research Studies, Vol. 40 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press for Supply and Services Canada, 1985), 6.Google Scholar

21 Althusser, Louis, “Les appareils idéologiques d'État,” in Positions (Paris: Éditions Sociales, 1976), 67–125.Google Scholar

22 Doern, “The Politics of Canadian Economic Policy,” 1.

23 Ibid., 6-7.

24 Laidler, David, “Economic Ideas and Social Issues: An Overview,” in Laidler, David (ed.), Approaches to Economic Weil-Being, Royal Commission Research Studies, Vol. 26 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press for Supply and Services Canada, 1985), 5.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., 9.

26 Ibid., 21.

27 Banting, Keith, “Images of the Modern State: An Introduction,” in Banting, Keith (ed.), State and Society, 1.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., 17.

29 Rice, James, “Politics of Income Security: Historical Developments and Limits to Future Change,” in Doern, (ed.), The Politics of Economic Policy, 247.Google Scholar

30 Cameron, David R., “The Growth of Government Spending: The Canadian Experience in Comparative Perspective,” in Banting, (ed.), State and Society, 21–51.Google Scholar

31 Korpi, Walter, The Democratic Class Struggle (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983).Google Scholar

32 Peacock, A. T. and Wiseman, J., The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

33 Buchanan, James and Wagner, Richard E., Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes (New York: Academic Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Offe, Class, Contradictions of the Welfare State (Boston: M.I.T. Press, 1984)Google Scholar; O'Connor, James, The Fiscal Crisis of the State (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Martin, Andrew, “The Politics of Employment and Welfare: National Policies and International Interdependence,” in Banting, Keith (ed.), The State and Economic Interests, Royal Commission Research Studies, Vol. 32 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press for Supply and Services Canada, 1986), 157–241, 158.Google Scholar

35 Ibid., 158-59 (my emphasis).

36 Ibid., 229.

37 Blomqvist, A. G., “Political Economy of the Canadian Welfare State,” in Laidler, (ed.), Approaches to Economic Well-Being, 89–136, 102.Google Scholar

38 Laidler, “Economic Ideas and Social Issues,” 30, 31.

39 Ibid., 38.

40 Blomqvist, “Political Economy of the Canadian Welfare State,” 103-04.

41 Banting, Keith, “The State and Economic Interests: An Introduction,” in Banting, (ed.), The State and Economic Interests, 1–33.Google Scholar

42 William D. Coleman, “Canadian Business and the State,” ibid., 249.

43 Ibid., 251, 252.

44 Panitch, Leo, “The Tripartite Experience,” in Banting, (ed.), The Slate and Economic Interests, 37–119.Google Scholar

45 Ibid., 113.

46 Ibid., 112.

47 McRae, K. D., “Linguistic Diversity and Economic Decision-Making: Three European Case Studies,” in Banting, (ed.), The State and Economic Interests, 121-55, 152.Google Scholar

48 Fournier, Pierre, “Consensus Building in Canada: Case Studies and Prospects,” in Banting, (ed.), The State and Economic Interests, 291–335.Google Scholar

49 Ibid., 294.

50 Wolfe, David, “The Politics of the Deficit,” in Doern, (ed.), The Politics of Economic Policy, 111-62, 133.Google Scholar

51 Ibid., 137, 138.

52 Broadway, Robin and Bruce, Neil, “Theoretical Issues in Tax Reform,” in Laidler, (ed.), Approaches to Economic Well-Being, 137-93.Google Scholar

53 Wolfe, “The Politics of the Deficit,” 154.

54 Ibid., 141.

55 Doern, “The Politics of Canadian Economic Policy,” 16.

56 Ibid.

57 Birch, Anthony H., “Political Authority and Crisis in Comparative Perspective,” in , Banting (ed.), State and Society, 87–130.Google Scholar

58 Rose, Richard and Peters, Guy, Can Government Go Bankrupt? (New York: Basic Books, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

59 Birch, “Political Authority and Crisis,” 120.

60 Cairns, “The Embedded State,” 54.

61 Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1976);Google ScholarPolitical Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (Boston: M.I.T. Press, 1985).Google Scholar

62 Birch, “Political Authority and Crisis,” 90.

63 Cairns and Williams, “Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada,” 41.

64 Williams, Cynthia, “The Changing Nature of Citizen Rights,” in Cairns, and Williams, (eds.), Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada, 99–131.Google Scholar

65 Cairns and Williams, “Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada,” 31.

66 Ibid., 34. See also Royal Commission Report, Vol. 1, 20.Google Scholar

67 Cairns and Williams, “Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada,” 38.

68 Knopff, Rainer and Morton, F. L., “Nation-Building and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” in Cairns, and Williams, (eds.), Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada, 133-82.Google Scholar

69 Ibid., 145.

70 Royal Commission Report, Vol. 1, 70.Google Scholar

71 Ibid., 69.

72 Taylor, Charles, “Alternative Futures: Legitimacy, Identity and Alienation in Late Twentieth Century Canada,” in Cairns, and Williams, (eds.), Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada, 183–229.Google Scholar

73 Ibid., 212, 213.

74 Ibid., 198.

75 Ibid., 211.

76 For examples of such economic and political alternatives one might cite Alec Nove, The Economics of Feasible Socialism (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1983);Google ScholarHodgson, Geoff, The Democratic Economy (London: Pelican, 1984);Google ScholarBarber, Benjamin, Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984);Google ScholarDahl, Robert, A Preface to Economic Democracy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985).Google Scholar This whole literature is clearly foreign to this Royal Commission.

77 “Western societies appear to be condemned to long periods of privatization during which they live through an impoverishing ‘atrophy of public meanings’ followed by spasmodic outbursts of ‘publicness’ that are hardly likely to be constructive. What is to be done about this atrophy and subsequent spasm? How do we reintroduce more steady concern with public affairs as well as ‘genuine public celebrations’ into our everyday lives?” (Hirschman, Albert O., Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action [Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982], 132).Google Scholar