Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T05:36:19.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Collective Characteristics of the Delegates to the 1968 Liberal Party Leadership Convention*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

C. R. Santos
C. R. Santos
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes de Recherche/Research Notes
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 1970 , pp. 299 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for example, Smiley, D. V., “The National Party Leadership Convention in Canada: A Preliminary Analysis,” this Journal, I, no. 4 (Dec. 1968), 373–97Google Scholar; Regenstreif, P., “Change in Leadership: The Succession to Diefenbaker and Pearson,” a paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, June 6, 1968, CalgaryGoogle Scholar; Thorburn, H. G., “An Approach to the Study of Federal Political Parties in Canada,” a paper read at the joint cpsa-acsp meeting held in Ottawa, Nov. 9–10, 1968Google Scholar; Wearing, J., “The Liberal Choice,” Journal of Canadian Studies (May 1968), 3–30.Google Scholar

2 We genuinely appreciate the co-operation of the Liberal convention delegates for taking time to answer our questionnaire. They shall, of course, remain anonymous in order to preserve the confidentiality which we promised to them.

3 Although some authors apply the term “variables” to quantitative data only and the term “attributes” to qualitative data, we are using the two terms synonymously, inasmuch as qualitative data may be categorized and the categories counted as if they were quantitative data.

4 Dominion Bureau of Statistics (dbs), 1966 Census of Canada, Sex Ratio, Population, Catalogue no. 92–609, vol. I (1–9), Dec. 1967, Introduction.

5 Ibid.

6 Department of National Revenue, Taxation Statistics, particularly Table 33 entitled “Tax-payers and Federal Tax Payable by Income Class, Taxation Year, 1966,” reproduced in The National Finances, 1968–9, Toronto, 47.

7 Ibid.

8 dbs, 1961 Census of Canada, Ethnic Groups, Population, Catalogue no. 92–545, vol. I, part 2, Bulletin 1.2–5, Introduction.

9 dbs, 1966 Census of Canada, Rural and Urban Distribution, Population, Catalogue no. 92–608, vol. I (1–8), March 1968, Introduction.