Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:56:57.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Politics of Nationalism and Status in Puerto Rico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

André Lecours*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Valérie Vézina*
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland
*
School of Political Studies, University of Ottawa, 120 University, Ottawa ON, K1N 6N5, email: [email protected]
Department of Political Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's NL, A1B 3X9, email: [email protected]

Abstract

Over the last several decades, nationalist movements in liberal democracies have challenged their community's relationship with the state. One such case that has drawn relatively little attention is Puerto Rico. A peculiar feature of Puerto Rican politics is that powerful nationalism coexists with several distinct status options: a reform of the current Commonwealth, statehood (becoming an American state), free association and independence. This article examines the various sources for Puerto Rican nationalism and discusses the relationship between nationalism and each of the status options. It also explains why none of the options has succeeded in gathering majority support amongst Puerto Ricans and why, therefore, the constitutional status quo has so far remained on the island.

Résumé

Plusieurs démocraties occidentales ont eu à composer avec des mouvements nationalistes au cours des dernières décennies. Un cas de mouvement nationaliste qui a peu retenu l'attention est Porto Rico. Le nationalisme porto ricain a la particularité de venir avec plusieurs options quant au statut politique de l’île : une réforme du statut existant (Estado Libre Asociado, ELA), l'indépendance, devenir un état des États-Unis et un arrangement de souveraineté-association avec les États-Unis. Cet article examine les différentes sources du nationalisme porto ricain et sa relation avec chacune de ces options politiques. L'article explique pourquoi aucune de ces options n'a jusqu’à maintenant obtenu une majorité réelle d'appui et donc pourquoi le statu quo constitutionnel demeure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Robert W. 1965. Party Politics in Puerto Rico. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Baldacchino, Godfrey. 2006. “Islands, Island Studies, Island Studies Journal.” Island Studies Journal 1: 318.Google Scholar
Baldacchino, Godfrey. 2007. A World of Islands: An Island Studies Reader. Charlottetown PEI: Island Studies Press.Google Scholar
Barreto, Amílcar Antonio. 1998. Language, Elites, and the State: Nationalism in Puerto Rico and Quebec. Westport CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Barreto, Amílcar Antonio. 2001. “Constructing Identities: Ethnic Boundaries and Elite Preferences in Puerto Rico.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 7: 2140.Google Scholar
Berríos Martínez, Rubén. 1977. “Independence for Puerto Rico: The Only Solution.” Foreign Affairs 55: 561–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berríos Martínez, Rubén. 1997. “Puerto Rico's Decolonization.” Foreign Affairs 76:100–14.Google Scholar
Brass, Paul. 1991. Nationalism and Ethnicity: Theory and Comparison. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bosque-Pérez, Ramón and Colón Morera, José Javier, eds. 2006. Puerto Rico under Colonial Rule: Political Persecution and the Quest for Human Rights. Albany NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2013. Economy at a Glance—Puerto Rico. http://www.bls.gov/eag/eag.pr.htm (May 3, 2016).Google Scholar
Carrión, Juan Manuel. 2006. “The War of the Flags: Conflicting National Loyalties in a Modern Colonial Situation.” Centro Journal 28: 101–23.Google Scholar
Carroll, Henry K. 1975 [1899]. Report on the Island of Porto Rico. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Colino, César and Hombrado, Angustias. 2015. “Besieged and paralyzed? The Spanish State facing the secessionist challenge in Catalonia and coping with the Reform imperative.” In Jahrbuch des Föderalismus, ed. Tübingen, Forschung. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, Europäisches Zentrum für Föderalismus.Google Scholar
Collazo, Sonia G., Ryan, Camille L. and Bauman, Kurt J.. 2010. Profile of the Puerto Rican Population in the United States and Puerto Rico: 2008. Census Bureau Report, Washington DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Comisión estatal de elecciones. 2017. “Plebiscito para la decolonizatión inmediata de Puerto Rico.” http://resultados2017.ceepur.org/Noche_del_Evento_78/index.html#es/default/CONSULTA_DESCOLONIZACION_Resumen.xml (June 16, 2017).Google Scholar
Conkling, Philip. 2007. “On Islanders and Islandness.” The Geographical Review 97: 191201.Google Scholar
Connor, Walker. 1984. “Eco- or Ethno-nationalism?Ethnic and Racial Studies 7: 342–59.Google Scholar
Cox Alomar, Rafael. 2015. “In search of a Puerto Rico strategy,” The Hill, November 5, 2015. http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-budget/259165-in-search-of-a-puerto-rico-strategy (May 4, 2016).Google Scholar
Denis, Nelson A. 2015. War against All Puerto Ricans. Revolution and Terror in America's Colony. New York: Nation Books.Google Scholar
Duffy Burnett, Christina and Marshall, Burke. 2001. Foreign in a Domestic Sense: Puerto Rico, American Expansion, and the Constitution. Durham NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fazi, André. 2012. “Insularity and Autonomy: From a Misleading Equation to a New Typology.” In Political Autonomy and Divided Societies: Imagining Democratic Alternatives in Complex Settings, ed. Gagnon, Alain-G. and Keating, Michael. Houndmills UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fernandez, Ronald. 1992. The Disenchanted Island. Puerto Rico and the United States in the Twentieth Century. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Guibernau, Montserrat and Hutchinson, John, eds. 2004. History and National Destiny. Ethnosymbolism and its Critics. Hoboken NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hay, Peter. 2006. “A Phenomenology of Islands.” Island Studies Journal 1: 1942.Google Scholar
Hearing before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate. 2013. Washington: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Hepburn, Eve. 2010. “A Comparative Analysis of Island Region Autonomy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Montreal.Google Scholar
Hepburn, Eve. 2012. “Recrafting Sovereignty: Lessons from Small Island Autonomies?” In Political Autonomy and Divided Societies: Imagining Democratic Alternatives in Complex Settings, ed. Gagnon, Alain-G. and Keating, Michael. Basingstoke UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hernández Cólon, Rafael. 2013. “Misguided Policy on Puerto Rico.” The Hill, December 13.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, John. 1987. The Dynamics of Cultural Nationalism: Gaelic Revival and the Creation of the Irish Nation State. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Keating, Michael. 2002. Nations against the State: The New Politics of Nationalism in Québec, Catalonia and Scotland. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keating, Michael. 2001. Plurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereign Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Gary and Sloane, Robert D.. 2009. “The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico's Legal Status Reconsidered.” Boston College Law Review 4: 1123–93.Google Scholar
Lecours, André. 2000. “Ethnonationalism in the West: A Theoretical Exploration.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 6: 103–24.Google Scholar
Lewis, Gordon K. 1963. Puerto Rico: Freedom and power in the Caribbean. London: Merlin.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1960. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lluch, Jaime. 2011. “Autonomism and federalism.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 42: 134–61.Google Scholar
Lluch, Jaime. 2014. “Varieties of Territorial Pluralism: Prospects for the Political and Constitutional Accommodation of Puerto Rico within the USA.” In Constitutionalism and the Politics of Accommodation in Multinational Societies, ed. Lluch, Jaime. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
McCall, Grant. 1994. “Nissology: A Proposal for Consideration.” Journal of the Pacific Society 17: 93106.Google Scholar
Mooney, Gerry and Scott, Gill. 2015. “The 2014 Scottish independence debate: Questions of social welfare and social justice.” Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 23: 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Nancy. 1995. Puerto Rico: culture, politics and identity. Westport CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Murillo, Mario. 2001. Islands of Resistance: Puerto Rico, Vieques and US Policy. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
Passalacqua, Juan M. Garcia. 1994. “The 1993 Plebiscite in Puerto Rico: A First Step to Decolonization?Current History 93: 103–07.Google Scholar
Pantojas-García, Emilio. 2005. “The Puerto Rican Paradox: Colonialism Revisited.” Latin American Research Review 40: 163–76.Google Scholar
Pantojas-García, Emilio. 2013. “The Puerto Rico status question: can the stalemate be broken?Caribbean Journal of International Relations & Diplomacy 1: 4152.Google Scholar
Pantojas-García, Emilio. 2015. Crónicas Del Colapso: Economia, Politica Y Sociedad De Puerto Rico En El Siglo Veintiuno. Ediciones Callejon: San Juan.Google Scholar
Pérez, Marvette. 2002. “The Political ‘Flying Bus’: Nationalism, Identity, Status, Citizenship and Puerto Ricans.” Critique of Anthropology 22: 305–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Puerto Rico: Greece in the Caribbean.” 2013. The Economist. October 26. http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21588374-stuck-real-debt-crisis-its-back-yard-america-can-learn-europes-aegean (January 2, 2016).Google Scholar
Prensa Asociada. 2009. “¿Se discrimina al usar el inglés en algunos tribunales de Puerto Rico?Daily News, Latino (New York), February 24.Google Scholar
Ramos Méndez, Mario. 2007. Posesión del Ayer: La nacionalidad cultural en la estadidad. San Juan: Isla Negra Editores.Google Scholar
Ramos Méndez, Mario. 2016. Fuera del laberinto: La estadidad como igualdad y soberanía. San Juan: Publicaciones Gaviota.Google Scholar
Report of the President's Task Force on Puerto Rico's Status, Washington: the White House, 2011 https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/Puerto_Rico_Task_Force_Report.pdf (June 16, 2017).Google Scholar
Rivera-Batiz, Francisco and Santiago, Carlos. 1996. Island Paradox: Puerto Rico in the 1990s. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Rivera-Ramos, Efrén. 2013. “Puerto Rico. Autonomy or Colonial Subordination?” In Practising Self-Government. A Comparative Study of Autonomous Regions, ed. Ghai, Yash and Woodman, Sophia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Romero-Barceló, Carlos. 1978. Statehood is for the Poor. San Juan: Romero-Barcelo.Google Scholar
Safa, Helen. 2011. “The Transformation of Puerto Rico: The Impact of Modernization Ideology.” Transforming Ideology 19 (1): 4649.Google Scholar
Scarano, Francisco A. 2000. Puerto Rico: Cinco Siglos de Historia. 2nd ed. Mexico: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. 2011a. Household Income for States: 2009 and 2010. American Community Survey Briefs. Washington DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. 2011b. Poverty: 2009 and 2010. American Community Survey Briefs. Washington DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
US Congress. 2016. Congressional Task Force on Economic Growth in Puerto Rico. Report to the House and Senate.Google Scholar
US Department of Justice. 2016. Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Respondents. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico vs Luis M. Sánchez Valle.Google Scholar
Wells, Henry. 1969. The Modernization of Puerto Rico. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyden, Ron and Murkowski, Lisa. 2013. United States Senate, Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, December 13.Google Scholar