Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:41:27.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Fragmentation in an Age of Scarcity: A Synthetic View and Critical Analysis of Welfare State Crisis*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Thomas O. Hueglin
Thomas O. Hueglin
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A general perception of crisis at the end of the postwar period of growth has spawned two types of theoretical response: while a conservative theory of overload focusses on ungovernability caused by postmaterialist value change, radical analysis points to the structural contradictions of the welfare and intervention state. This article suggests that the current crisis is characterized by postmaterialist persistence and structural contradictions under the conditions of economic constraint. It examines polarization and potential mobilization of fragmented postindustrial societies in the context of neo-conservative politics, and it suggests a regime of economic dualism and/or corporatism as the most likely outcome.

Résumé

La crise telle que perçue généralement depuis la fin de la période de croissance des années d'après-guerre a suscité deux types d'explication: celle de la théorie conservatrice qui met l'accent sur le phénomène de l'ingouvernabilité et du changement vers des valeurs post-matérialistes, et celle de l'analyse radicale qui fait ressortir les contradictions structurelles de l'interventionnisme d'état et de l'État providence. Le présent article caractérise la crise actuelle à la fois par la persistance des valeurs post-matérialistes et par l'existence de contradictions structurelles inhérentes aux conditions de l'économie. II examine la polarisation sociale et les possibilités de mobilisation au sein des sociétés post-industrielles fragmentées et ce, dans le contexte des politiques néo-conservatrices, et il propose un régime d'économie mixte et/ou de corporatisme comme étant l'ssue la plus vraisembable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 235 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “The Politics of Consensus in an Age of Affluence,” American Political Science Review 59 (1965), 874–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 “Postindustrial Politics: How Benign Will It Be?” Comparative Politics 6 (1974), 163–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 See Offe, Claus, Contradictions of the Welfare State (London: Hutchinson, 1984)Google Scholar.

4 See “Politics and Scarcity,” Special Issue of International Political Science Review 4 (1983)Google Scholar.

5 See Ashford, Nigel, “The Neo-Conservatives,” Government and Opposition 16 (1981), 353–79;CrossRefGoogle ScholarCrozier, Michael J., Huntington, Samuel P. and Watanuki, Joji, The Crisis of Democracy (New York: New York University Press, 1975);Google ScholarKing, Anthony, “Overload: Problems of Governing in the 1970s,” Political Studies 23 (1975), 284–96;CrossRefGoogle ScholarRose, Richard, “Ungovernability: Is there Fire Behind the Smoke?” Political Studies 27 (1979), 351–70;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and critically, Offe, Contradictions of the Welfare State, esp. chap. 2.

6 See Gough, Ian, The Political Economy of the Welfare State (London: Macmillan, 1979), 126–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Offe, Contradictions of the Welfare State, 153 (author's emphasis).

8 See O'Connor, James, The Fiscal Crisis of the State (New York: St. Martin's, 1973), esp. 1–12;CrossRefGoogle ScholarMishra, Ramesh, The Welfare State in Crisis (Brighton: Wheatsheaf, 1984), 72–78;Google ScholarCameron, David, “Does Government Cause Inflation? Taxes, Spending, and Deficits,” in Lindberg, Leon N. and Mayer, Charles S. (eds.), The Politics of Inflation, and Economic Stagnation (Washington: The Brookings Institution, 1985), 224–79;Google ScholarNavarro, Vicente, “The 1980 and 1984 U.S. Elections and the New Deal,” in Miliband, Ralph et al. (eds.), Socialist Register 1985/86 (London: Merlin, 1986), 186–91;Google ScholarOffe, , Contradictions of the Welfare State, 263–66Google Scholar.

9 Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation (Boston: Beacon Press, 1957), 176Google Scholar.

10 Wolfe, David, “The Crisis in Advanced Capitalism: An Introduction,” Studies in Political Economy 11 (1983), 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Therborn, Goeran, “Classes and States,” Studies in Political Economy 12 (1984), 32–36Google Scholar.

12 See Crozier, et al., The Crisis of Democracy, 1–9 and 113–15Google Scholar.

13 “The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies,” American Political Science Review 65 (1971), 994–95Google Scholar.

14 “The Changing Structures of Political Cleavages in Western Society,” in Dalton, Russell J., Flanagan, Scott C. and Allen Beck, Paul (eds.), Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984), 69Google Scholar.

15 See Etzioni, Amitai, An Immodest Agenda (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983);Google ScholarJohnson, Chalmers (ed.), The Industrial Policy Debate (San Francisco: ICS Press, 1984);Google ScholarKerr, Clark, The Future of Industrial Societies (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983);CrossRefGoogle ScholarLane, Jan-Erik (ed.), State and Market (London: Sage, 1985);Google ScholarBorda, Orlando Fals (ed.), The Challenge of Social Change (London: Sage, 1985);Google ScholarRivlin, Alice M. (ed.), Economic Choices 1984 (Washington: Brookings Institution, 1984)Google Scholar.

16 Buerklin, Wilhelm P., “Value Change and Partisan Realignment in West Germany 1970–1983,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, 1984, 9–12Google Scholar.

17 Social Limits to Growth (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976), 2–10;Google Scholar compare Ellis, Adrian and Kumar, Krishan (eds.), Dilemmas of Liberal Democracies (London: Tavistock, 1983)Google Scholar.

18 Etzioni, , An Immodest Agenda, 361;Google Scholar see also 3–25 and 342–71.

19 Skidelsky, Robert, “The Decline of Keynesian Politics,” in Crouch, Colin (ed.), State and Economy in Contemporary Capitalism (New York: St. Martin's, 1979), 64Google Scholar.

20 See Lipietz, Alain, “The Globalisation of the General Crisis of Fordism,” SNID Occasional Paper (Kingston: Queen's University, 1984), esp. 4–14Google Scholar.

21 Compare Zysman, John, “Inflation and the Politics of Supply,” in Lindberg and Mayer (eds.), The Politics of Inflation and Economic Stagnation, 147–48;Google Scholar and on the causal nexus of inflation and deficit spending, see David R. Cameron, “Does Government Cause Inflation? Taxes, Spending, and Deficits” (ibid., 224–79).

22 Offe, , Contradictions of the Welfare State, 164–70Google Scholar.

23 Rose, , “Ungovernability,” 369Google Scholar.

24 Compare Reich, Robert B., “Toward a New Public Philosophy,” The Atlantic Monthly, May 1985, 68–79;Google ScholarSteinfels, Peter, The Neoconservatives (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979);Google Scholar and Walzer, Michael, “Nervous Liberals,” New York Review of Books, October 11, 1979, 5–9Google Scholar.

25 Wolfe, A., “Sociology, Liberalism, and the Radical Right,” New Left Review 128 (1981), 22Google Scholar.

26 Skidelsky, , “The Decline of Keynesian Politics,” 57Google Scholar.

27 See Krauss, Melvyn, “‘Europeanizing’ the U.S. Economy: The Enduring Appeal of the Corporatist State,” in Johnson (ed.), The Industrial Policy Debate, 71–90Google Scholar.

28 Ashford, , “The Neo-Conservatives,” 362Google Scholar.

29 “Squaring the Political Circle: Industrial Policies and the American Dream,” in Johnson, (ed.), The Industrial Policy Debate, 42Google Scholar.

30 See Etzioni, , An Immodest Agenda, 315Google Scholar.

31 The Great Transformation, 73.

32 See Heilbroner, Robert L., The Nature and Logic of Capitalism (New York: Norton, 1985), 105–06Google Scholar.

33 Compare Wolfgang Streeck, “Neo-Corporatist Industrial Relations and the Economic Crisis in West Germany,” in Goldthorpe, John H. (ed.), Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), esp. 303–14Google Scholar.

34 Compare Allessandro Pizzorno, “Interests and Parties in Pluralism,” in Berger, Suzanne (ed.), Organizing Interests in Western Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), 267–68Google Scholar.

35 Compare Leo Panitch, “The Role and Nature of the Canadian State,” in Panitch, L. (ed.), The Canadian State (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977), 7–8;Google Scholar and the debate between Leslie Pal, A. and Cuneo, Carl J. in this JOURNAL 19 (1986), 71–103Google Scholar.

36 Amott, Teresa, “The Politics of Reaganomics,” in Nell, Edward (ed.), Free Market Conservatism (London: Allen and Unwin, 1984), 173–74Google Scholar.

37 Berger, Suzanne, “Politics and Antipolitics in Western Europe in the Seventies,” Daedalus 108 (1979), 27Google Scholar.

38 See Tiryakian, Edward A. and Rogowski, Ronald (eds.), New Nationalisms of the Developed West (Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1985);Google ScholarBorda, Fals, The Challenge of Social Change; and Freeman, Jo (ed.), Social Movements of the Sixties and Seventies (New York: Longman, 1983)Google Scholar.

39 See above, note 2.

40 King, , “Overload,” 294Google Scholar.

41 Berger, , “Politics and Antipolitics in Western Europe,” 30Google Scholar.

42 Amott, , “The Politics of Reaganomics,” 173Google Scholar.

43 Hodgson, Geoff, “Thatcherism: The Miracle That Never Happened,” in Nell, (ed.), Free Market Conservatism, 184–91Google Scholar.

44 See Schier, Steven E. and Vig, Norman J.Google Scholar, “Economic Performance and Mass Support: The Thatcher and Reagan Regimes,” in Vig, N. J. and Schier, S. E. (eds.), Political Economy in Western Democracies (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1985), 257–83Google Scholar.

45 See Hall, Peter A., “Patterns of Economic Policy: An Organizational Approach,” in Bornstein, Stephen, Held, David and Krieger, Joel (eds.), The State in Capitalist Europe (London: Allen and Unwin, 1984), 21–43;Google Scholar and Jessop, Bob, “The Transformation of the State in Post-War Britain,” in Scase, Richard (ed.), The State in Western Europe (London: Croom Helm, 1980), 30–33Google Scholar.

46 “Thatcherism and British Manufacturing: A Question of Hegemony,” New Left Review 151 (1985), 5–25Google Scholar.

47 Offe, , Contradictions of the Welfare State, 164Google Scholar.

48 See Reich, , “Toward a New Public Philosophy,” 72–73;Google Scholar and Leys, , “Thatcherism and British Manufacturing,” 88–89Google Scholar.

49 Schmidt, Manfred G., “The Welfare State and the Economy in Periods of Economic Crisis: A Comparative Study of Twenty-Three OECD Nations,” in Vig and Schier (eds.), Political Economy in Western Democracies, 148–49Google Scholar.

50 Goldthorpe, John, “Problems of Political Economy After the End of the Post-War Period,” unpublished manuscript, Nuffield College, Oxford, 1982, 40Google Scholar.

51 See for details: Palmer, John L. and Sawhill, Isabel V. (eds.), The Reagan Record (Cambridge: Ballinger, 1984), 321–37;Google ScholarSchier, Steven E. and Vig, Norman J., “Reviving Capitalism: Macroeconomic Policies in Britain and the United States,” in Vig and Schier (eds.), Political Economy in Western Democracies, 182–94;Google ScholarLeys, , “Thatcherism and British Manufacturing,” 10–11;Google ScholarBremer, Heiner et al., Politik der Wende (Hamburg: Rasch und Roehring, 1985), 83–84;Google Scholar compare also, Blumberg, Paul, Inequality in an Age of Decline (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980)Google Scholar.

52 Palmer, and Sawhill, , The Reagan Record, 287–316;Google ScholarThe Economist, February 25, 1984, 99;Google ScholarHarris, Candee S., “The Magnitude of Job Loss From Plant Closings and the Generation of Replacement Jobs: Some Recent Evidence,” in “Deindustrialization: Restructuring the Economy,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 475 (1984), 25–26;CrossRefGoogle ScholarRivlin, , Economic Choices 1984, 119–33;Google ScholarAmott, , “The Politics of Reaganomics,” 177–79;Google ScholarBluestone, Barry and Harrison, Bennet, The Deindustrialization of America (New York: Basic Books, 1982), 188–90;Google ScholarLeys, , “Thatcherism and British Manufacturing,” 12–13;Google ScholarRose, David et al., “Economic Restructuring: The British Experience,” in “Deindustrialization: Restructuring the Economy,” 144–45;Google ScholarBremer, et al., Politik der Wende, 30–31Google Scholar.

53 Rokkan, Stein and Urwin, Derek W., Economy Territory Identity (London: Sage, 1983), 2–14;Google ScholarRose, et al., “Economic Restructuring,” 145;Google ScholarLeys, , “Thatcherism and British Manufacturing,” 24–25;Google ScholarNairn, Tom, The Break-up of Britain: Crisis and Neo-Nationalism (London: NLB, 1977), 380;Google ScholarThe Globe and Mail, Report on Britain, May 6, 1985; Etzioni, , An Immodest Agenda, 163–73;Google ScholarWright, Deil S. and White, Harvey L. (eds.), Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations (Washington: The American Society for Public Administration, 1984), 25;Google ScholarHarris, , “The Magnitude of Job Loss From Plant Closings,” 23–25;Google ScholarKrauss, , “‘Europeanizing’ the U.S. Economy,” 82;Google ScholarKucinich, , quoted in Carroll, Peter N., It Seems Like Nothing Happened (New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1982), 348;Google ScholarEsser, Josef, Fach, Wolfgang and Vaeth, Werner, Krisenregulierung (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1983), 54–187;Google ScholarBremer, et al., Politik der Wende, 41Google Scholar.

54 Quoted in Altvater, Elmar, Huebner, Kurt and Stanger, Michael, Alternative Wirtschaftspolitik jenseits des Keynesianismus (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1983), 160CrossRefGoogle Scholar (my translation).

55 “What is the Rust Belt's Problem?” in Johnson, (ed.), The Industrial Policy Debate, 121–23Google Scholar.

56 Lekachman, Robert, Greed is Not Enough: Reaganomics (New York: Pantheon, 1983), 13Google Scholar.

57 See Martin, Andrew, “Political Constraints on Economic Strategies in Advanced Industrial Societies,” Comparative Politics 10 (1977), 323–54Google Scholar.

58 For a recent definition and analysis see Katzenstein, Peter J., Small States in World Markets (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985), 31–33Google Scholar. Incidentally, Katzenstein relies almost entirely on the orthodox view of “liberal” corporatism; it seems to be a pattern that “liberal” corporatists usually ignore their radical critics: see below, notes 62–67.

59 See Attewell, Paul, Radical Political Economy Since the Sixties (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1984)Google Scholar, chap. 2; Thurow, Lester C., The Zero-Sum Society (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980), 54–61;Google Scholar and Kraus, , “‘Europeanizing’ the U.S. Economy,” 82–90Google Scholar.

60 See the critical discussion in Matthews, Ralph, The Creation of Regional Dependency (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1983), 56–68;Google Scholar compare Courchene, Thomas J., “Analytical Perspectives on the Canadian Economic Union,” in Trebilcock, Michael J. et al. (eds.), Federalism and the Canadian Economic Union (Toronto: Ontario Economic Counil, 1983), esp. 91–93;Google Scholar and recently by the same author, “The Fiscal Arrangements: Focus on 1987,” in Ottawa and the Provinces: The Distribution of Money and Power (Toronto: Ontario Economic Council, 1985), vol. 1, 3–21Google Scholar.

61 Attewell, , Radical Political Economy Since the Sixties, chaps. 2–3;Google ScholarStreeck, , “Neo-Corporatist Industrial Relations and the Economic Crisis in West Germany,” 310–14;Google ScholarGoldthorpe, John H., “The End of Convergence: Corporatist and Dualist Tendencies in Modern Western Societies,” in Goldthorpe (ed.), Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, 329–35Google Scholar.

62 See esp. Gerhard Lehmbruch, “Concluding Remarks: Problems for Future Research on Corporatist Intermediation and Policy-Making,” in Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lehmbruch, G. (eds.), Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979), 305;Google Scholar and Lehmbruch, G., “Concertation and the Structure of Corporatist Networks,” in Goldthorpe (ed.), Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, 60–80;Google Scholar for the classical definitions and discussion, see the articles by Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lehmbruch, G., in Schmitter and Lehmbruch (eds.), Trends Toward Corporatist IntermediationGoogle Scholar, and in Lehmbruch, and Schmitter, (eds.), Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making (London: Sage, 1982)Google Scholar.

63 See Dahl, Robert A., Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982);Google ScholarLindblom, Charles, Politics and Markets (New York: Basic Books, 1977)Google Scholar. For a critical discussion of these authors, see John F. Manley, “Neo-Pluralism: A Class Analysis of Pluralism I and Pluralism II,” American Political Science Review 77 (1983), 368–83;CrossRefGoogle Scholar a useful critique of the conceptual flaws of neo-corporatism is McBride, Stephen, “Corporatism, Public Policy and the Labour Movement: A Comparative Study,” Political Studies 33 (1985), 439–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Crouch, Colin, “The State, Capital and Liberal Democracy,” in Crouch, (ed.), State and Economy in Contemporary Capitalism, 19;Google Scholar see also Fach, Wolfgang, “Ausgangspunkte des Diskurses, Ende des Modells?” Journal fuer Sozialforschung 23 (1983), 385–88;Google ScholarKastendiek, Hans, Kastendiek, Hella and Reister, Hugo, “Incorporation of the Trade Unions?” (Frankfurt/Main: Institut fuer Sozialforschung, 1983);Google ScholarPanitch, Leo, “Corporatism and Capitalist Democracy,” paper presented at the World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Rio de Janeiro, 1982Google Scholar.

65 Esser, Josef and Fach, Wolfgang, “Korporatistische Krisenregulierung im ‘Modell Deutschland’,” in Alemann, Ulrich von (ed.), Neokorporatismus (Frankfurt/Main: Campus, 1981), 158–79Google Scholar (my translation).

66 Schmitter, Philippe C., “Democratic Theory and Neo-Corporatist Practice,” EUI Working Paper 74 (Florence: European University Institute, 1983), 55–56Google Scholar.

67 Panitch, Leo, “Corporatism in Canada,” Studies in Political Economy 1 (1979), 44–45;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Crouch, , “The State, Capital and Liberal Democracy,” 19Google Scholar.

68 Offe, Compare, Contradictions of the Welfare State, 284–86Google Scholar.